Why Trump seam so desperate to start negotiation with Iran after threatening to annihilate their civilisation. The internet commentators were thinking that Trump may use nuclear bombs to do so but here we know that this option may not be acceptable to you know who. So, what other option does Trump (the PTB) as in their arsenal that would do the “job” but could not be pointing to straightforwardly (for the general population) to them. A natural disaster would do the job.
Could the US team of negotiators that Trump (PTB) is sending to Pakistan not holding an olive branch but a hammer. Yes, so far Iran as shown great strength and show the world that the US can be beaten in a conventional war with 20 century weaponry but what about 21 century or beyong one. Can Iran defend again them?
I explore this option because of what the C’s repeated many time in the transcript, that the Lizzies are getting desperate to achieve total control and of course what they told us about the real semitic human population specific potential.
I’m probably using to much of my imagination but as you will see below, 21 century weapon use again Iran may have devastating effect to say the least. Could even brink it back to
stone age.
Just shake a few stones.
Cassiopaean Session Transcripts Search
(L) I have a question. I've been waiting for somebody to ask it, but since nobody is going to ask it, I want to ask it: Was the Haiti earthquake an induced earthquake, or was it totally natural?
A: (Planchette swirls on board) INDUCED! Bet you didn't expect that, did you?!
Ark) It's probably much easier for the island than on the mainland...
(L) Yeah, because you've got separation with the ocean bed and different strata. It would be too uncontrollable if you started zapping a fault on a large land body.
Question to google A.I.
What was the strength of the 2010 Haiti earthquake?
The 2010 Haiti earthquake was
a catastrophic magnitude 7.0
earthquake. It struck on January 12, 2010, at a shallow depth of 13 km (8.1 miles), with the epicenter located approximately 25 km (15 miles) west of the capital, Port-au-Prince. It was followed by severe aftershocks, including magnitudes 5.9 and 5.5.
Key details regarding the earthquake's impact include:
- Devastation: The shallow depth and proximity to populated areas resulted in massive destruction, including the collapse of the President's Palace, hospitals, and thousands of homes.
- Casualties: Estimates of deaths vary between 100,000 and 316,000.
- Displacement: Approximately 1.5 million people were left homeless.
- Intensity: It was the most powerful earthquake in the region since the 18th century.
Question
How geologically stable is Iran?
Iran is geologically unstable,
ranked among the world's most seismically active countries due to its position within the Alpine-Himalayan orogenic belt. The country experiences frequent, destructive earthquakes caused by the collision of the Arabian and Eurasian plates.
Over 90% of the country is covered by active faults, with major deformation in the Zagros and Alborz mountain ranges.
Encyclopædia Iranica +4
Key Geological Features & Risks
- Active Tectonics: Iran is a complex collage of rigid crustal blocks surrounded by mobile, active orogenic belts.
- Major Seismic Zones: The Zagros fold-and-thrust belt in the southwest and the Alborz mountains in the north are highly active.
- Earthquake Frequency: Frequent earthquakes often result in significant damage, landslides, and mass movement, especially in northern and southeastern Iran.
- Volcanic Activity: Mount Damavand, a volcano in the Alborz range, is dormant.
- Resource Potential: The intense geological activity contributes to rich mineral resources, including iron ore, zinc, copper, and major hydrocarbon basins.
In summary, Iran is not geologically stable, but rather a region of intense, ongoing tectonic deformation
