Brian Dugan's brain the subject of sentencing hearing

truth seeker

The Living Force
I think this will be interesting to see the outcome of this case and if this FMRI will be regularly used in court cases.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-dugan-06-nov06,0,3849114.story

(bold mine)
Neuroscientist testifies that brain-imaging technique shows Dugan to be among the most psychopathic of people

By Ted Gregory and Art Barnum Tribune reporters

November 6, 2009

Brian Dugan's sentencing hearing for the murder of 10-year-old Jeanine Nicarico ventured into somewhat uncharted territory of criminal psychology Thursday when a leading researcher of psychopathic brain imaging testified for the first time in a court proceeding.

Kent Kiehl, a neuroscientist and associate professor of psychology at University of New Mexico, told jurors considering whether to sentence Dugan to death that Dugan is a psychopath whose brain function registers among the most psychopathic people.

That conclusion may come as no surprise. A violent offender since his teenage years, Dugan, 53, now is serving two life prison sentences for the rapes and murders of a 7-year-old girl and 29-year-old nurse. In 2005, a grand jury indicted him in the 1983 kidnapping, rape and murder of Jeanine Nicarico, a crime to which he pleaded guilty in July.

The controversy centers on Kiehl's specialty: Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (FMRI), a series of snapshots of the brain that reportedly show what segments of the organ are working properly and improperly.

Defense attorneys are expected to use Kiehl's testimony as a basis for the argument that Dugan's brain is defective and as such, incapable of making moral decisions.

For almost two hours Thursday, defense attorney Allan Sincox led Kiehl through an explanation of psychopathy, FMRI and Dugan's place in those areas. Discovered in about 1992, Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging exposes the brain to strong magnetic fields that purport to show where oxygen is being consumed when the individual is shown photographs, reads, performs math problems and listens to sounds, among other activities.

The resulting maps, converted to numeric scores, show areas of the brain that are working and those that are malfunctioning, Kiehl testified. In the case of a psychopath, those sections dealing with moral decision-making, normal inhibitions, emotion, attention and language are inactive, Kiehl said.

Dugan's psychopathy score totals 37, Kiehl said. A normal individual's psychopathy score is about 4, he added. The average prison inmate's score is 25.

"His score is in the highest range of any of the inmates I've ever met," said Kiehl, who has scanned more than 300 high psychopathy prison inmates. "In my opinion, that constitutes an emotional disturbance. I think it's up to the jury to decide how to interpret that."

But, while its acceptance is growing, FMRI remains highly debatable, particularly in legal proceedings. DuPage County State's Attorney Joseph Birkett tried to emphasize that point in cross-examining Kiehl Thursday afternoon.

Birkett suggested that "a lot of controversy" exists about the confusion that FMRI can create among jurors. Kiehl agreed that it has created confusion over a defendant's "culpability."

The prosecutor also stated that "most psychopaths are not violent, and most violent people are not psychopaths," then asked Kiehl whether he agreed. Kiehl said it depended on the specific definition of psychopath one chose to take.

Kiehl left the witness stand after almost four hours of testimony.
 
article said:
Defense attorneys are expected to use Kiehl's testimony as a basis for the argument that Dugan's brain is defective and as such, incapable of making moral decisions.

Don't know why defense is using this. As far as I can see, being a psychopath can be a reason to put someone to death because they can't understand punishment for their crime and can never be rehabilitated.
 
This is indeed horrible!! If the defense succeed in having psychopathy as "insanity defense" then lots of murderous psychopath will be able to make this plea and will not be persecuted for their crime!! It's been so long since I studied criminal law, but if I can remember correctly, to "make a crime", there must be 2 essential elements, i.e. the action (actus reus) and the intention (mens rea). And in this case, the Defense attorneys are saying that, yes, he did kill.. BUT... since the brain is defective, then there can be no intention!! Therefore, no crime!!?!?!

Help!!! This is just too much!! :scared:
 
It's quite bizarre and I'm wondering where they're going with this. It's seems that it can and probably will go one of the two ways both of you have stated. Either they are unable to be held responsible for their crimes and given lighter sentences or found as a group that can't be rehabilitated and therefore instantly sentenced to death. The latter being obviously far more dangerous to society as I'm sure some will be incorrectly diagnosed and given an instant death sentence.

We may be seeing the ponerization of this technology as we speak. I'll have to read more on FMRI and what's going on with it. The good news however, in my opinion, is that the case itself may finally bring a more accurate assessment of psychopathy to the general public. We'll see...
 
I'm not terribly sure Dr Kiehl has as strong a grasp on the phenomenon as is thought. His primary area of interest is the fMRI studies, and even then his focus is on violent psychopaths - the ones that get imprisoned.

"His score is in the highest range of any of the inmates I've ever met," said Kiehl, who has scanned more than 300 high psychopathy prison inmates. "In my opinion, that constitutes an emotional disturbance. I think it's up to the jury to decide how to interpret that."

But, while its acceptance is growing, FMRI remains highly debatable, particularly in legal proceedings. DuPage County State's Attorney Joseph Birkett tried to emphasize that point in cross-examining Kiehl Thursday afternoon.

Birkett suggested that "a lot of controversy" exists about the confusion that FMRI can create among jurors. Kiehl agreed that it has created confusion over a defendant's "culpability."

The prosecutor also stated that "most psychopaths are not violent, and most violent people are not psychopaths," then asked Kiehl whether he agreed. Kiehl said it depended on the specific definition of psychopath one chose to take.

Kiehl left the witness stand after almost four hours of testimony.

Psychopaths don't suffer an emotional disturbance - they simply have a different set of emotions, ones that are baser, more primitive, and completely self-centered. In fact, the literature suggests most of them have a sort of 'hunger' that drives their actions. The target of that hunger varies from psycho to psycho, but typically it seems to involve the suffering of others.

There isn't much controversy over the technology as far as an fMRI is concerned. It's used daily in all sorts of neuroscience, it just shows what parts of the brain are being utilized during a specific task. It has shown psychopathic brains function differently then normal humans, that's a fact. Why that would make anyone less guilty for a crime they've committed is beyond me - but then again defense attorneys have to do the best job they can, so confusing the issue might be their best shot.

Kiehl also indicates that their are 'multiple definitions' of psychopathy. That struck my attention, it seems as if he can't grok the depth of the difference between psychopaths are normal humans. This stuck out when I met him, I interviewed for a position as a tech in his lab last April, so I had an opportunity to meet and discuss the issue with him. He seemed to have a preformed idea of psychopathy, and while his mentor - Dr Hare - did a write up on non-criminal psychopaths, Kiehl didn't really 'buy' it.

He also had this way of pronouncing the word that made me giggle, maybe some of you pronounce it the same, but when I say it out loud I pronounce it Psycho-Pathy, whereas he pronounced it Psychop-Athy. Mentioning it here just because it was another oddity that stood out. I didn't end up getting the position, the grant he was expecting to pay me from got cut shortly thereafter.
 
Puck said:
Kiehl also indicates that their are 'multiple definitions' of psychopathy. That struck my attention, it seems as if he can't grok the depth of the difference between psychopaths are normal humans. This stuck out when I met him, I interviewed for a position as a tech in his lab last April, so I had an opportunity to meet and discuss the issue with him. He seemed to have a preformed idea of psychopathy, and while his mentor - Dr Hare - did a write up on non-criminal psychopaths, Kiehl didn't really 'buy' it.

He also had this way of pronouncing the word that made me giggle, maybe some of you pronounce it the same, but when I say it out loud I pronounce it Psycho-Pathy, whereas he pronounced it Psychop-Athy. Mentioning it here just because it was another oddity that stood out. I didn't end up getting the position, the grant he was expecting to pay me from got cut shortly thereafter.

Thanks for the extra insight. From what you're saying, it sounds as though Kiehl runs into the same issue as most of us do which is a difficulty accepting that psychopaths don't have to be violent.

What struck me in the article was that the prosecutor seemed to have a better understanding of psychopathy than Kiehl. Can you, if you don't mind, speak to more of the preformed idea of psychopathy that Kiehl has/had? Do you mean it's pretty much textbook?
 
Puck said:
Psychopaths don't suffer an emotional disturbance - they simply have a different set of emotions, ones that are baser, more primitive, and completely self-centered. In fact, the literature suggests most of them have a sort of 'hunger' that drives their actions. The target of that hunger varies from psycho to psycho, but typically it seems to involve the suffering of others.

I agree. I don't think that psychopaths are "Driven to do evil" because they have a "faulty stoplight" as Liane Leedom proposes, but rather thaty they are "hungry" to create, witness, and feed on the suffering of others. In this context, what satisfies the appetite of the individual psychopath can be quite varied.
 
truth seeker said:
What struck me in the article was that the prosecutor seemed to have a better understanding of psychopathy than Kiehl. Can you, if you don't mind, speak to more of the preformed idea of psychopathy that Kiehl has/had? Do you mean it's pretty much textbook?

Well that's the issue really, there is no 'textbook' definition of psychopathy. It's not even in the DSM-IV. The definition he uses is the PCL-R which is the scientific standard for determining psychopathy. Now his big thing, the reason he's so hot in the field right now, is because he's using fMRI data and contrasting normal controls/non-psychopathic offenders/psychopathic offenders. So he administers the PCL-R and a host of other psychological evaluations, and then schedules the fMRIs and looks for correlation. He's found it too. It basically validates Hare's checklist with an independent methodology showing extremely different cerebral responses to emotional data between psychopaths and non-psychopaths.

Its hard for me to recall the exact conversation I had with him, but I remember bringing up non-criminal psychopaths and Hare's work, Snakes in Suits and he made a sort of joke out of it. Something about no one funding that sort of research. It's also nearly impossible to prove the existence of non-criminal psychopaths using anything other then anecdotal/circumstantial evidence, and 'hardcore' scientists don't like that.

I was also informed of his 'personality quirks' by his subordinates, things like he's really demanding, doesn't understand when a person is overworked. You have to be firm with him. Also told he can have a big head sometimes and really liked to show up his $$ by taking speakers out to fancy dinners and such. In retrospect I'm kinda glad I didn't get the position because it would have involved a cross-country move to a small city in new mexico where I knew no one. In general he didn't really throw off 'good vibes' either, so I'm glad my passion for the research was abrogated by funding cuts.
 
Thanks so much for clarifying Puck.

Well the jury has come to a decision. What I'm now having a problem with is the timeline reported by the Chicago Sun Times (http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/1878169,brian-dugan-timeline-case-111109.article)

If that information is correct, why would Dugan's own lawyer implicate him in this (Jeanine's) crime when he was already charged with another?

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-dugan-death-penalty-12-nov12,0,2638852.story
Moments after a clerk announced that jurors Wednesday had condemned Brian Dugan to death for the rape and murder of Jeanine Nicarico, more than a quarter century of weddings interrupted by cemetery visits, of missed graduations, of guilt and anguish, cascaded on the Nicarico family.

Through their tears, they found enough composure to display a gesture of wordless gratitude. They leaned forward and hugged Opal Horton, who escaped Dugan the day he raped and killed her best friend. Then they turned and embraced another Dugan survivor, Sharon Grajek.

Later, speaking with the news media, Patricia Nicarico tried to explain why.

"Having met them and gotten to know them has really been a very special thing for us, and something we will never forget," she said. "We have a bond, and it's not the best kind of a bond to have, but it's a very special bond."

She described the verdict as a relief and added, "We are shedding tears not of sadness, but of joy, but not really very, very joyful because the death sentence is never really a joyful thing. But Brian Dugan is somebody who deserves it, in our minds."

Dugan showed no reaction to the verdict.

"I think he expected it, and it was a DuPage County jury," said Steven Greenberg, one of his defense attorneys. "Our claim during trial was that he suffers from a mental illness, that he is a psychopath, and a psychopath doesn't show emotion."

Judge George Bakalis will hear post-trial motions on Dec. 16 and set an original execution date as required by law. But also required by law is an automatic appeal directly to the Illinois Supreme Court.

Still, the sentence is a major milestone in one of Illinois' most infamous criminal cases, which started when a 10-year-old Naperville-area girl stayed home from school with the flu. Dugan broke into the Nicarico home and kidnapped Jeanine, then brutally raped and murdered her, leaving her body to be found two days later along the Illinois Prairie Path.

In the last 26 years, the case condemned two innocent men to death, then freed them, led to the landmark malfeasance indictments of seven law-enforcement officials who later were acquitted and influenced death-penalty reform.

Dugan first hinted at his involvement in the 1983 crime in late 1985, but he was not charged with the murder until November 2005. He pleaded guilty in July this year, allowing the case to go directly to sentencing, where jurors had only two choices: death or life in prison.

For the last six weeks, jurors have heard details of Dugan's life of crime beginning with petty thefts, proceeding to a series of rapes and assaults on west suburban women and ending with the kidnappings, rapes and murders of not only Jeanine but 7-year-old Melissa Ackerman, of Somonauk, and Donna Schnorr, 27, of Geneva. Dugan was serving two life sentences for those murders.

The defense countered with two weeks of testimony about Dugan's mental deficiencies and with claims that his admission of involvement in the Nicarico crime took two innocent men off death row.

Jurors began deliberating late Tuesday afternoon. At 10 p.m. Bakalis said the jury had flipped a light switch to indicate it had a verdict. But before the verdict could be announced, some members asked for more time to deliberate. Bakalis sequestered them for the night, and they resumed deliberations Wednesday.

After about five more hours of deliberations, the unanimous decision was read aloud.

The defense's arguments appeared to have been given close consideration by at least some members of the jury, who made several requests during deliberations for more information: copies of testimony from mental health experts who studied Dugan and his brain, and transcripts of testimony about Dugan's statements in the 1980s linking him to the Nicarico crime.

"Brian Dugan's initial claims about Nicarico in 1985 helped put the death penalty issue back before the public," Greenberg said, suggesting that although Dugan is a "despicable person," he deserves credit for that. "There are a lot of other people who went free (from death row) because of Brian Dugan and this case."

In 2000, Gov. George Ryan imposed a moratorium on executions, later commuting 171 death sentences.

State's Attorney Joseph Birkett, a leading proponent of the death penalty, said the current "moratorium is fiction, the moratorium is a joke. Gov. Pat Quinn or whoever the next governor is should end it."

Even so, Birkett said that with the required appeals it could be eight years or more before Dugan is executed.

Rolando Cruz, one of two men who spent more than a decade on death row for Nicarico's murder, said he hoped the jury's decision helps bring closure for the victims' families and himself.

"I feel good right now, but it's not a reason to celebrate or reason to jump for joy for anything," he said.

Another man feeling relief was Edward Cisowski, a retired Illinois State Police commander who in 1986 investigated Dugan's claims of involvement in the Nicarico crime. Cisowski came to believe that Dugan was the sole perpetrator, a belief that caused friction with former prosecutors who doubted Dugan's story.

Cisowski said he told Dugan in 1986 that "if you are the one that killed that little girl, I am going to put you on death row."

After the jury fulfilled Cisowski's long-ago promise, he said outside the Wheaton courthouse, "It just took a little longer than I had hoped for."

Tribune reporter Vikki Ortiz Healy contributed to this report. abarnum@tribune.com

Also, if anyone's interested here are the supporting documents surrounding the case: http://www.tilljusticeisdone.com/documents.html
 
Thing is, psychopathy is NOT a "mental illness" - it is a different type of hominid walking around on our planet, looking like us... an intraspecies predator.
 
Laura said:
Thing is, psychopathy is NOT a "mental illness" - it is a different type of hominid walking around on our planet, looking like us... an intraspecies predator.

I totally agree. Unfortunately this seems to be the sticking point in trying to get people to understand exactly what they're dealing with. It's just sticking in my mind that this particular case may be being used for nefarious purposes towards society as a whole.
 
truth seeker said:
Laura said:
Thing is, psychopathy is NOT a "mental illness" - it is a different type of hominid walking around on our planet, looking like us... an intraspecies predator.

I totally agree. Unfortunately this seems to be the sticking point in trying to get people to understand exactly what they're dealing with. It's just sticking in my mind that this particular case may be being used for nefarious purposes towards society as a whole.

Exactly. All the more reason to start thinking about the FOTCM psychopathy research and education program.
 
Puck said:
Kiehl also indicates that their are 'multiple definitions' of psychopathy. That struck my attention, it seems as if he can't grok the depth of the difference between psychopaths are normal humans. This stuck out when I met him, I interviewed for a position as a tech in his lab last April, so I had an opportunity to meet and discuss the issue with him. He seemed to have a preformed idea of psychopathy, and while his mentor - Dr Hare - did a write up on non-criminal psychopaths, Kiehl didn't really 'buy' it.

In my discussions with some other experts in the field, Kiehl is a bit of a blow-hard. One of the big names even told me that Kiehl isn't really taken seriously by the others and that Kiehl's approach "does not represent the future of psychopathy research." What you heard about his quirks is telling. Dabrowski would probably categorize him as a level I individual.

He also had this way of pronouncing the word that made me giggle, maybe some of you pronounce it the same, but when I say it out loud I pronounce it Psycho-Pathy, whereas he pronounced it Psychop-Athy. Mentioning it here just because it was another oddity that stood out. I didn't end up getting the position, the grant he was expecting to pay me from got cut shortly thereafter.

This is the real pronunciation. I haven't heard a researcher that doesn't pronounce it this way. psych-OP-athy
 
Back
Top Bottom