I wouldn’t necessarily be as pessimistic. I think that sometimes these things need to ’brew’ and mature before they break through. One could hypothesize that Sheldrake’s morphic resonance plays a part here: the more people accept the possibility that what Candace et al. present might be true, the more people have an easier time (less resistance) to ’go there’ in their minds. But to reach critical mass takes time.
I believe that truth tries to emerge in our reality (perception, consciousness and soul) and the evidence that is shared or acquired is so strong and so in plain sight that it cannot be contained, so it is exploited or attacked by some or others. The best “defense” against truth is attack, obfuscation and misrepresentation. In this case I remember the October 7 operation.
Mossad-Macron Israel - (which reminds me, too, of
Epstein's political blackmail and extortion lists. ) After time has passed this story -'Becoming Brigitte'- has been exploited, monetized, normalized, misrepresented and non-accepted to the point where we all see it but with a certain strange obedience we expect “the official version”.
In my opinion, I think Candace, Trogneux and those around them are like those mentioned in the last Cass sessions. the kind of “journalists” or influencers who pay heed, exercise damage control over the establishment narrative, spin and therefore have no autonomy, judgment or independence and conclude nothing concrete, just a grey where everything is “pseudo-weird”. The Sionists and Trump are the ones who can silence or continue the chapters of this novel that seems to be getting longer, will know how to profit from these European pockets and their corrupt and immoral politicians who want us to pay for a war already lost in favor of the banks. Europe is sold out.
To rescue and what really has value in this whole plot is the resistance of a huge minority, those who want to know the truth and try to find it, understand and separate what is happening have the power to subtly or strongly move the results, something that many define as “a duty and an act of resistance” and that could turn this case of Brigitte into a front page story in the world if many more would join.
Here is a conference, a little long but interesting, by Juan Branco, lawyer and important figure of the Yellow Vests movement, who speaks about the French globalist oligarchy and a long history of consequences very well explained, -and I believe that this is replicated in the countries where we live- where at the end he touched the point that interests us which is that of the Macron and in which he seems to have a slip of the tongue in his speech:
(...) “ Brigitte Macron is a little worried because Brigitte Macron knows that she met Emmanuel Macron when she was 39 and he was 14 and that she met him when she was a high school teacher, and she does not know what to do with that and she is very ashamed because she knows that she left Amiens with him to escape the opprobrium that had been generated in the bourgeoisie to which they mutually belonged, he the son of a professor of medicine, she the son of an industrialist of the chocolate factory. From this relationship which is in fact technically a relationship that could have been criminally repressed for acts of pederasty and so I have no judgment to make on the morality and the mutual desire that these men had, this man and this woman to finally meet again, this boy and this woman to meet again, but I understand the anxiety that could have seized Emmanuel; Brigitte Macron who suddenly finds no better idea than to open up to the very honest Xavier Niel who introduces him himself. So, Mimi Marchand, former drug dealer and pimp, was also found with 500 kilos of hashish in a truck and went to prison for it, and Brigitte Macron, Mimi Marchand and Xavier Niel decided to mount a brilliant communication operation which consisted in reversing the stigma. ”
You can translate it into English by activating the YT subtitles.
