Brigitte Macron is a man?

bianca etezete said:
well, to survive swimming in shark waters, especially for such a long time as Candace is being roaming those waters, you have to be a shark yourself, no? Or you have a special cloak, which is also a hint of protection... I see her in the light, don't get me wrong, but we only see one side of C. not all of them.
Click to expand...

Q: (Pierre) Well, so it's that. People got scared. That's a documented thing. The first leaks from Macron's servers was those documents from a NATO/CIA-sponsored foundation in France that was pushing for a lot of migration and a lot of mosques and stuff. I was wondering if his main mission is to bring in migrants and stir things up to lead towards a civil war?

A: US wishes to destabilize EU similar to Syria so that they can come in and "fix" things. i.e. rule and control resources and trade the "American way". Everyone will speak English!

Presently working on something else but your questioning resonates with my finding so far. As you can see from the above quote destabilizing EU including England seem on the agenda these days. Musk is crusading in England and Germany and Candace took upon herself to clean the elysé of Macron. Both have merit in these crusade mind you but doesn’t the US as their own dirt in position of power. Probably much worse so don’t tell me that your house has been cleaned up and it is now time to do the same elsewhere.

Since the C’s told us that there was a change in the plan, we see the left taking a beating in the western hemisphere and for just a cause but to me, it all seem to come forward the closer to Trump inauguration. I do not say that Candace is operating knowingly to destabilize France but reacted as Candace react automatically to what she consider and immoral situation. So Candace receiving the Macron dossier some time ago may be of benefice to the US or at the least it deep State. As for Musk who next week will be part of the US government, it can be describe as ingerance politic of many other countries. There is what seems like a push in the western hemisphere to destabilize all those lefty government, a push for more conservative and nationalist faction and that may indicate for the near future a revaluation of immigrant politic and as in America promised by Trump, more drastic measure. Is the scenario given by the C’s above about to come real? Time will tell.I
 
Laurentien2 said:
Q: (Pierre) Well, so it's that. People got scared. That's a documented thing. The first leaks from Macron's servers was those documents from a NATO/CIA-sponsored foundation in France that was pushing for a lot of migration and a lot of mosques and stuff. I was wondering if his main mission is to bring in migrants and stir things up to lead towards a civil war?

A: US wishes to destabilize EU similar to Syria so that they can come in and "fix" things. i.e. rule and control resources and trade the "American way". Everyone will speak English!
Click to expand...
I've actually been thinking about this session for a few months now... perhaps plans might've changed, and they may not be able to pull it off, but it does certainly seem like their goal to weaken Europe and their industry and get their people at each other's throats only to come and offer a solution.

Might be one other reason why Trump is bad news, he doesn't want to deal with anyone else's problems. So all the effort they made to break the EU will go to waste because without the influence to keep it broken and then offer a solution, the EU will simply fix itself on its own terms, away from the US.
 
Alejo said:
I've actually been thinking about this session for a few months now... perhaps plans might've changed, and they may not be able to pull it off, but it does certainly seem like their goal to weaken Europe and their industry and get their people at each other's throats only to come and offer a solution.

Might be one other reason why Trump is bad news, he doesn't want to deal with anyone else's problems. So all the effort they made to break the EU will go to waste because without the influence to keep it broken and then offer a solution, the EU will simply fix itself on its own terms, away from the US.
Click to expand...
Well plans may change but the end goal probably hasn’t change, the total control of humanity prior to transitioning to 4th density. So how they get there may transition from one ideology to it opposite if some celestial law bind them to change their plans.

What we witnessed is how far (extreme) the amplitude of the pendulum of the lefty ideology as gone and now we see that it has reached it apogee and seem to move in the opposite direction. The question is will it have the same amplitude toward the right as it follow the natural law. Can Trump slow it down or will he amplify it is the question and what I found so far in the transcript tend to push toward the second option. Yes time will tell and we may not have much to wait as Trump is inauguration speech is on Monday and it should give us, I think, at least some clue. If whom I suspect was forced to use Trump need to, following some other celestial law of free will, indicate the direction of the next Trump administration. Will it remain MAGA or will it transit to MAG, make America greater.

It sure kept me sitting on the edge of my chair. Exiting time indeed!
 
One thing that has me wondering is if the whole Greenland / Canada public posturing is related to the middle-East possibly going out of the pathocratic Anglo-centric control , especially with the recent Iran and Russia closer relations ( which was somewhat predictable , especially considering that the Transcripts state that Iran already has nuclear armaments Session 13 June 2015 ) , one issue with this perspective that remains somewhat in question is China however.
 
One information that wasn't mention in the thread that happened in early december. The only error here is that they were not 30 but 4 people, they are all connected to this special case regarding " Monsieur Brigitte "

On December 13, 2024, Mike Borowski appeared on Géopolitique Profonde to comment on the recent arrest of 30 people for cyberstalking Brigitte Macron.

An unprecedented wave of arrests

Thirty individuals, including writers and public figures such as Zoé Sagan and Bertrand Scholler, were arrested for messages deemed offensive to Brigitte Macron. This large-scale operation marks a turning point in the management of online criticism. The state seems to want to send a clear message: any overly virulent criticism of figures of power, even on the Internet, will be suppressed.

This police intervention, disproportionate according to some, illustrates an increasingly blurred line between freedom of expression and cyber-harassment. By targeting identifiable personalities, the state is demonstrating its desire to protect power against accusations deemed destabilizing.

The shadow of the “Jean-Michel Trogneux taboo
This affair takes place against a backdrop of controversy, fuelled by a persistent rumour about an alleged double identity for Brigitte Macron, linked to the name Jean-Michel Trogneux. Although denied by the Élysée, the rumor set social networks ablaze.

By opting for a heavy-handed judicial response, the state may unwittingly be reinforcing these speculations. This repressive management seems to reveal an inability to deal in any other way with criticism and rumors that undermine power.

A strategy that raises questions about the future of freedom

Beyond this particular case, this affair raises questions about freedom of expression in France. While cyber-harassment deserves appropriate responses, mass arrests for comments published online are akin to an authoritarian drift.

Far from protecting democratic debate, these measures risk stifling it. They raise an essential question: is it still possible to criticize the authorities without fear of prosecution? By seeking to muzzle its critics, the authorities are intensifying the controversy, transforming certain defendants, such as Zoé Sagan and Bertrand Scholler, into symbols of a fight for fundamental freedoms.

An attempt at control that backfires

Rather than calming tensions, the affair amplified the controversy. The arrests have sparked an outcry on social networks, with many denouncing an attack on democracy. The Jean-Michel Trogneux rumor, far from being dispelled, is gaining in visibility, fueled by what is perceived as an attempt at censorship.

This scandal goes beyond the case of Brigitte Macron and highlights a worrying trend: a state that, in the face of dissent, favors repression over transparency. If this trend persists, France risks tipping over into a society of control, where criticism becomes a crime.

For a detailed analysis of the mechanisms of power and authoritarian excesses, take a look at Géopolit's monthly review.

Géopolitique Profonde - Autonomie & Décentralisation

Bienvenue sur Géopolitique Profonde ! On analyse sans filtre l'actualité économique et politique en vous apportant les meilleures solutions de souveraineté.
geopolitique-profonde.com
Click to expand...

AFFAIRE TROGNEUX : ZOÉ SAGAN EN GARDE À VUE ! | GÉOPOLITIQUE PROFONDE

Episódio de podcast · GÉOPOLITIQUE PROFONDE (www.geopolitique-profonde.com) · 14/12/2024 · 45 min
podcasts.apple.com
 
Abats said:
Candace Owen just sent the reply to the letter to Mr and Mr Macron, it's full of questions, I add the tweet where there is a french translation of the questions too

Click to expand...
I'm glad to see this was posted here, but just in case something happens to that X post, I'm uploading Owens' questions here:

Owens_questions_Macrons.jpg
 
GaëlYann said:
Isn't today the day Candace Owens is supposed to make revelations ?
Click to expand...

From what I recall, she said Friday. And I think it will be a series instead of a single show with all the revelations in one go. Like she did with the Kamala Harris ancestry story. She presented what information she had on the case, and people watching her show would help her dig deeper with data from their part of the world. Like the info she received from Haitian listeners, or Kamala's uncle getting in touch with her to clear up some parts of that story.

It should be fun to watch, though I fear it might be way more disturbing looking behind the Brigitte façade than it was looking into Kamala's ancestry :shock:

Edit to add:

 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom