C: "Bush will be president until he dies"

bedower said:
Dant, if you're an American (SOTT main page today), how come you didn't know the answer? This is not a criticism; just an honest question. I'm really curious; don't you study the Constitution at school?
Click to expand...

I knew of this "list of succession", but what if this "list" is moot (in the eyes of a psychopath),
but the question is:

1) How can any of Obama's chosen people assume the role, if they have
not been cleared? What if *any* of Obama's choices are moot and revert
back to the current (status quo) `regime'? What if there are some `rules'
that `certify' the candidate before they can be qualified to hold the office?

The blocking of the Senator from Illinois is a case in point? All of this `legal'
wrangling seems apparent to me (to serve an agenda), but then again, what
sort of `rules' are they using, especially of the (classified) signing statements
Bush has put into place (perhaps at the urging of the puppet-master)?

2) Martial Law. Since as above, Bush has signed many "laws", many that are
classified, Congress and the Courts have done nothing to challenge them,
and will probably stall or stymie the process, and in the meantime, actions
will be carried forward per the signing statements much like in the fashion
that Bush & his cronies have done making the case for war against "terrorism"
(by PTB's definition) and/or for national security claims and already set into
motion, leaving a trail of damage and destruction everywhere with no restrictions?
Will it be too late by then? Will the constitution and it's laws will be suspended,
trampled to death, making recovery, `impossible'?

There are probably other cases, I haven't thought of... but these are on my mind
at this time. There are too many questions, and very few answers! Once can only
guess at, if at all, the possibilities of the things to come? There are 7 more days left.

FWIW,
Dan
 
Which Bush were the C's referring to? Is George H. W. Bush possibly the true power behind the Bush family/presidency, regardless of who is officially in that post? And would he be the power behind Obama, thus making Bush the true president? Or is there another power behind Boy George Bush which will also control the next president, and in this sense 'Bush will be president until he dies' refers to this same power using whatever puppet is there? If it is true that Bush as president actually knows very little of why he does anything and is only following orders, then why would it be different for any other president?

Another possibility is that the courts will finally pick up on the possibility that Obama is not a natural born U. S. citizen and disallow his presidency, thus allowing Bush to remain in office until the situation is resolved. I often thought this issue was being used as a manipulative tool to keep the neocons in power by providing a drama on the stage which gives the neocons some type of legitimacy for holding on to the presidency.
 
[quote author=dant today] ... but these are on my mind
at this time. There are too many questions, and very few answers! Once can only
guess at, if at all, the possibilities of the things to come? [/quote]

Dant, I can't really answer for anyone else, but I certainly share your concerns. There are just too many variables; it seems to be a given that people in power don't like to give it up. I doubt George Bush is an exception; if not for himself, he seems to be too much the perfect 'useful idiot' for his handlers to want to let him go, osit. At least he has proven to be very biddable, imo, especially now that news of Olmert's 'phone call' has been circulating on the Net. There is a piece about it on the SOTT front page.

Compared to Bush, Obama is still an unknown quantity it seems to me; he has said that he thinks it's a good idea to talk to Iran(ian politicians), and that he is looking for 'a change in the Middle East'. What does he mean by it, and do we believe him? If the PTB have any doubts about Obama, or even suspect that he might not toe the line in parrotting their policies, what do you think his chances will be? About as good as a snowball in a frying pan, I should think!

Of course, it may be that you and I have got it completely wrong and are worrying over nothing; Bush will finally leave the White House and Obama will be inaugurated without any problems whatsoever, and then go on to be a good honest president, reversing all of the neo-con war policies, imperialism and signing statements, and generally bringing peace and prosperity to America, and by extention, to the rest of the world.

Wouldn't that be nice?

;)
 
bedower said:
Of course, it may be that you and I have got it completely wrong and are worrying over nothing; Bush will finally leave the White House and Obama will be inaugurated without any problems whatsoever, and then go on to be a good honest president, reversing all of the neo-con war policies, imperialism and signing statements, and generally bringing peace and prosperity to America, and by extention, to the rest of the world.

Wouldn't that be nice?

;)
Click to expand...

Well, the way things are for what they are in the here and
now, "Wishful thinking will get you Everytime". The way things
have been running, and as history shows, it is very unlikely
that Obama is the "Savior of the World", assuming that he does
`take over' as president. There is nothing as far as I know, that
prevents Bush from kicking out Obama before, during, or afterwards.
So - we will see soon enough, but no peeking is allowed, obviously ;)
 
A: There are many ways to die.
Click to expand...

maybe he has been 'dead' for a long time already?
and the one we get to see is a reanimated soul-less clone/duplicate?
there is also session 941119
A: George Bush was involved with Philadelphia
experiment.
Q: (T) He was Navy, World War II.
Click to expand...
and 961228
A: Well, is it possible for you to differentiate between that
which is an apparition, and that which is not. And does it
really matter? Or, is "apparition," merely a classification? Or a
"label?"
Q: (V) Is it really there?
A: Are you? Are we? Is George Bush? Or is he an
apparition?
Click to expand...
 
[quote author=dant yesterday] but no peeking is allowed, obviously [/quote]

If only... Aw shucks, dant - you are a spoilsport! Time for a :cool2:


[quote author=rrraven yesterday] and the one we get to see is a reanimated soul-less clone/duplicate?
[/quote]


Funny you should posit that, rrr - it crosses my mind every time I see him on TV. The very idea just seems too outlandish, but in view of those two Cass quotes, maybe not. :scared:
 
I am not sure that W. was ever a decent human being or ever even had any semblance of a "soul", but here is something curious, a video comparing his public speeches 10 years ago to now:

_http://digg.com/educational/George_Bush_used_to_be_a_fluent_linguist?FC=PRCK1

Maybe that's some evidence that something did happen to him. Just stress of the presidency or more? Maybe he received a very powerful dose of mind programming that turned whatever brain he did have into complete spaghetti. Or some mental disease. Or maybe he was swapped with a robotic clone. The C's called him a "reaction machine", it would be funny if when they say "machine" this time they meant it in the fullest sense of that word.
 
hm, i only know that bush has a history of alcohol/drug abuse, i'm not informed about his dietary habits or his effort to finally get that high-school diploma... ;)
 
Presidential Inauguration Day
Date: Jan 20, 2009
Time: 10:00AM PST

Obama is now President.

I don't know what to think, the meaning of the subject as
quoted by the C's. Perhaps I misunderstood in literal terms,
or it is not over and there are more surprises yet to come?

Just wondering.
Dan
 
Or the C's just didn´t got this one right. I remember reading in the wave series they saying the "accuracy rate of the transmission" was of 70% or something like that. And as they say, the future is open.
 
Since the surname: `Bush' was only mentioned, there is a possibility
that it could be Jeb Bush or some other `Bush' they are referring to.
There was a discussion not long ago, when someone asked about Jeb's
interest in the Presidency.

I guess that question was not asked `which Bush', are the C's referring
to. You are right, the future is open.
 
I could be wrong, but to me this looks just like Green_Manalishi said. Maybe the C's just were wrong on that. If they were "right" about everything they said, that would violate free will, right? If they meant it more symbolically, then I don't know.

I understand that it would have meant some different developments if Bush had remained a president, but since we already know what PTB plan on a general level, was that an important point to begin with, I wonder?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom