Canadian Orwellian world: Lockdowns, vaccines passports and more

I took a quick look on Ancestry about the Carney-Kemper wedding, and while there's not much that's interesting, it was funny to read that they were married by Robert Carney's brother, Rev. J. P. Carney.

Carney-Kemper

Vertie Margaret Kemper and Robert James Carney were united in marriage by the groom's brother, Rev. J. P. Carney,
this morning at 11 high mass was celebrated in St. John the Apostle church. It was a choral service with the choir from Seminary of Christ the King singing the high mass.

Principals are the daughter of Mr. and Mrs. John Anthony Kemper and son of Mr. and Mrs. Robert Carney.

The bride chose a floor length gown of heavy white no brocaded satin in rose design on princess lines with wide neckline and full skirt. A matching satin cap held her fingertip veil. Her only jewelry was her paternal grandmother's pearl pin and she carried white gardenias and stephanotis. Miss Juanita Biagioni was maid of honor and bridesmatrons, Mrs. J. W. Davies and Mrs. B. Phillips. They wore ballerina gowns of iridescent rose taffeta and carried button chrysanthemums.

Flower girl Michele Munro, the bride's niece, wore a pale green brocaded frock and carried a colonial bouquet. Fred Carney was best man for his brother. Seating guests were Frank Moran, Will, Robert White, Brian Samson Jim, and Duthie Welsford. The reception was held in the parish hall, where the toast was proposed by George Hurley of Britannia Beach. The bride is a graduate of Little Flower Academy and Provincial Normal school.

The groom graduated in Arts from University of B.C. this year. President the Newman Club on the campus, he affiliated with Alpha Deita Phi fraternity. The newlyweds motoring to Portland on their honeymoon.

I also highlighted Michele Munro only because there was a long-standing Canadian politician named John Carr Munro who served in Pierre Trudeau's cabinet as the Minister of Amateur Sport, Minister of Health and Welfare, Minister of Labour and Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development. He's got a checkered past with illegal insider trading, kickbacks and other irregularities.
 
As for the non-April surprise election in Canada, it's looking more and more like a Carney coronation, election by media proxy, although one never knows. Usually for us Westerners, by the time polls close in Ontario the shows already over - maybe a seat here or there, but it is generally a done deal.

In the mid seventies (cough), all bright eyed and bushytailed, had worked in a minor, and more or less as a minor, in both federal and provincial elections. At least back then there were good discussions, even in the press, now there are no discussion and no press. With the boomers going from pandemic fear to full-on Russophobe fear while drumming slava Ukraini (mixed in with the constant fear that carbon is killing us), along came Trump to reignite fear over tariffs (like that has never been a political schtick). So, the 51st yellow-man-bad has had that effect, he can turn headline tides and make people unhinged. It is very good for Carney.

Below, some scenes may be remembered, and the narrative is by a lawyer featured here before, a professor who seems to speak to the libertarian side (kind of Ron Paul'ish), insofar as he tends to allow for greater nuance under a legal mind, while not being strictly black and white. It is tricky as always, and he comes at it from the position of law as it pertains to the state and ideological control. He might be a little like Frederic Bastiat in a more modern sense, although things don't really change much other than technological material.

If the natural tendencies of mankind are so bad that it is not safe to permit people to be free, how is it that the tendencies of these organizers are always good? Do not the legislators and their appointed agents also belong to the human race? Or do they believe that they themselves are made of a finer clay than the rest of mankind?”
[...]
When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men in a society, over the course of time they create for themselves a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it.”
― Frédéric Bastiat

But that is Fred.

The short film below starts of with the old USSR/Canada hockey match as an element, not of sports, but of pure in your head cold war. And oh how it has flipped since. In the game scene, Phil Esposito, who may be remembered, although many will not, makes comment on words heard from the Vancouver arena stands, but not just there as it was creeping in all over in the decades going forward.

Can Canada as a country survive? I've my doubts, and daresay that under Carney it will be liquidated quickly in the sense of wealth transfer and controlling nterests. Unfortunately, some in the wings like Maxime Bernier, just have no press attraction (for obvious paid for press reasons), thus no provincial thrust.

Good luck, Canada.

 
Can Canada as a country survive?

There is a lot of talk and YT video's about the separation of Alberta (Saskatchewan, Manitoba and maybe B.C.) from Canada. The question of joining the States is not there yet but just independence from Canada. However, an Alberta lawyer named Jeffery Rath is apparently moving things along by assembling a delegation to go to D.C. and talk with the Trump admin. about joining the States.


So far, as I understand, only independence is more favourable with 37% of Albertans right now. (I'm not sure where this guy is getting this number from.)


He says that percentage might increase if Carney/Libs are elected. That wouldn't surprise me, but a referendum would need to be held for separation and Rath (wrath?) is expecting one to be called by the end of the year.


This is moving pretty fast so I'm trying to keep calm and not get charged up by inflammatory rhetoric. That being said, Apr. 28 is not that far away.

Rath has made an appearance on the forum already writing and opinion piece posted here.
 
There is a lot of talk and YT video's about the separation of Alberta (Saskatchewan, Manitoba and maybe B.C.) from Canada. The question of joining the States is not there yet but just independence from Canada. However, an Alberta lawyer named Jeffery Rath is apparently moving things along by assembling a delegation to go to D.C. and talk with the Trump admin. about joining the States.


So far, as I understand, only independence is more favourable with 37% of Albertans right now. (I'm not sure where this guy is getting this number from.)


He says that percentage might increase if Carney/Libs are elected. That wouldn't surprise me, but a referendum would need to be held for separation and Rath (wrath?) is expecting one to be called by the end of the year.


This is moving pretty fast so I'm trying to keep calm and not get charged up by inflammatory rhetoric. That being said, Apr. 28 is not that far away.

Rath has made an appearance on the forum already writing and opinion piece posted here.
If Carney gets his way, the percentage of those in favor of separation will increase. All Danielle needs is a referendum and it's done. There is nothing Carney can do as the Supreme Court will give Alberta justification. The Provinces have jurisdiction and sovereignty on their territory. Danielle knows it and if this happens, it will be messy but at least Trump will make it more easy for Danielle. Carney will give in to Trump. He is a washcloth with a lot of dirt on it's face. He will show force (for appearance's sake) but underneath, no bite.
By the way, I'm still hoping that he won't win. All we hear is what the Media (paid for by the PTB) is saying. We should just believe in ourselves, not what they are telling us.

Maybe Saskatchewan will join, don't know. BC could become their own country as they have many millionaires living there and a lot of money laundering occurs within their shores. They could easily become independent.
But Manitoba will need to be coaxed a lot as the current premier is really into being given money from other sources to function. Our debt ration is extreme for a province whose population is extremely low and far distanced between communities, particularly in the North. No, Manitoba, as of today, will never join Alberta or Saskatchewan. People within our government prefer to listen to the Liberals. And remember that Manitoba has a strong Francophone community /presence within the province. They would prefer to be "allied" to Quebec than leaving the Maple Leaf.
If Alberta starts, then within a few years of Carney's plunders, then perhaps.
But again, that is all suppositions until we know for sure who will be the next Maple Leaf Premier.
 
To my mind this is largest mind control propaganda against the Canadian people in history, the fight for a WEF takeover in Canada...Mark Carney. A globalist and WEF proponent of the Green Agenda, or the leader of the Conservative leader, a monumental decision of how the country will swing. Polls are corrupted mostly swaying to the Liberals, which have nothing to offer from a grey man a grey financial advisor, that is Net Zero all the way...keep Nations natural resources in the ground, competition unless sanctioned the globalists of the WEF,

Anyone read or watched the teen books and movies the Hunger Games...the first two should be and eye opener for the future of our younger generations.

As for political poles, I find this interesting from an independent media resource provided y Juno News, formerly True North. The demographics and ages are most interesting.


Also for the edge of spice this rant from podcaster Jasmine Laine


As an side, would have posted something sooner, problems with my keyboard.
 
Good show from The Duran, hosting Matthew Ehret.


Main themes:

- Canada has never had a real national identity, only a vague 'Anti-Americanism'... and the current nationalism in reaction to Trump is not a nationalism with any future, not a real vigorous, independent and informed nationalism, just the same vague 'we are different than Orange Man Bad'

- Canada has historically been kept intentionally underdeveloped, underpopulated, and also culturally stunted, hypnotized, lobotomized... this is a deliberate policy; the only real holdout against this mentality is in Alberta

- Canada has been kept in this weak state because it's role was historically to be subservient to the City of London as a balancing block in a broader game of geopolitics, not a sovereign nation with its own will and destiny... and this will continue under Carney

- Carney's wife was part of a 2020 Canada project, so it's likely the Carney plan was in motion for years

- In the past, Canada built sea-to-sea railway in order to maintain British anti-American influence on the Continent, basically to shore up the colony but also keep it in control... in the same way, Carney, although he's an anti-growth carbon crusader, may engage in some form of mass infrastructure projects to shore up the colony but also keep it under control, and maintain its 'blocking' role in geopolitics

- to that end, Carney may try to loosen the China-Russia bond by taking a strong approach towards Russia and the Arctic, while courting China with trade deals or offering up Canada's natural resources for dirt cheap, as well as non-cooperation with Trump
 
Good show from The Duran, hosting Matthew Ehret.

Kind of along the lines of Ehret (club of Rome et al.), had run across one Dr. Jacob Nordangård PhD., who has 2 mentions on the forum, and I don't know much about him. However, here, Nordangård is interviewed by Corbett, where the discussion looks to Jacob's books and current thesis - looking at the old theosophy society (Alice Bailey), going back to Madame Helena Blavatsky, and to H.G Wells and the gang. Their modus looks to hidden masters (enlightened ones and wise men), while the forward scene of believers seems to be masquerading under pseudo spiritualism while being underpinned by the eugenics crowd (they can never abandon that ship). The theme is always the world should be run by us, schtick.

In the interview, invariably the discussion moves to Mark Carney, and starting at 21:44, Nordangård provides background on him; how he fits in and how he has been managed. Carney is an old protégé of Maurice Strong (who had fingers in many pies) and others. Thus, it is no surprise that Carney finds himself on stage for some type of showdown.

The discussion reminded me of the C's look at circles within circles.

May 1995:

A: Remember, all is structured in cycles and circles.

Q: (L) In other words, these tunnels were built by and belong to the Consortium, is that correct?

A: Circles within circles.

Q: (L) Masons?

A: One example of concept.

As is understood, there seems to be many levels - the day to day minions carrying out their operating instructions. Then there are the string pullers/programmers, who in turn are held tight with reins while being given prime directives, that may or may not be of this earthly realm. And then the consortium and brotherhood(s). It is enough to know that it is a near impossibility, given what people face, to ever really understand the complexities of these circles. The shadows indeed run deep, although the front men and woman can be relatively seen, and Mark is one such (American brothers and sisters, let alone Canadian, really need to understand this guy).

Not excluded in the interview is Trump's camp, or circle, and these ideas of control, with overlap, seem to manifest in the open or the occluded, with their war going on underneath for structural/societal dominance. The mechanism is still a bankers war (it has to be that), and even the bankers are probably fighting amongst themselves. Mark is the face of the fellowship of bankers, and life under his debits and credits is not going to be fun, no.

Here is the lead up to the interview:

Author and researcher Jacob Nordangård joins James to discuss his new article, “Externalization of the Money Masters,” which provides a very different take on the rise to power of Mark Carney. From Madame Blavatsky and theosophy to Alice Bailey and The Externalisation of the Hierarchy to Nordangård and Temple of Solomon, you won’t want to miss this fascinating exploration of the occult roots of the globalist agenda.

 
Here is the lead up to the interview:

The interview is 40:40 minutes long and the Carney discussion happens at 22:04. I didn't realise that he was that connected. Absolutely bizarre if what they say is true about this ideological secret society stuff that Carney, specifically, seems to be adhered to. Geez, that WEF meditation. Rather then if, I wonder by how much North America is going to 'get biblical'.
 
To my mind and IMO, this the the emergence of the money managers for takeover of world markets on a financial scale (Mark Carney is reputed to be a master).

And Canada is a testing ground for the infiltration of a country nation wide to promote a country, a nation that is fully with a Net Zero agenda fully in alignment with the WEF. He is fully aligned with this agenda along with his wife from the Eurasia Group another Net Zero ideology fanatic. The proof is in his book VALUES...Maybe the explanation for Schwab's...You will own Nothing and be Happy

With the Conservatives, supposedly not leading in political polls, despite massive rally numbers, breaking records in Canadian history, even Trudeau in his facsimile of Obama's hope and change or whatever that was never reached such high numbers, he offers hope and change for the vast majority of Canadians, in what he calls the lost decade. Will he deliver on his promises, who knows, but many Canadians are faced with the alternative a future presented with the Liberals, doing the same thing over again, or a leader that speaks to the common people that really do work to make a country a productive economy. They are the people that make things, work and produce.

In the coming two weeks makes for an exciting time for the psychological ops against the Canadian people.
 
And Canada is a testing ground for the infiltration of a country nation wide to promote a country, a nation that is fully with a Net Zero agenda fully in alignment with the WEF.

"a nation that is fully with a Net Zero Neo-Nazi agenda"

Could not help myself, Joan, taking liberties with your lead-off after reading the following below, I mean, this is in tandem to when Hunka of the Waffen SS kind, graced Parliament to the applause of all parties. Whitewashed now, yet how is this to be reconciled? I can't, it is baffling that it could ever happen, but it did. The only thing I can say is that it has become an incremental test, and it is working at least since 2014.

It has been mentioned prior regarding the statics of the Ukrainian community in Canada - they are settlers like so many of us at one time. Many good older hardworking families, too, and there are east west divisions amongst the Ukrainian associations, with the Ukrainian Congress the most dominant one. In fact, ties to this Congress in Parliament itself is quite the accomplishment, thus, they have great political clout, as can be seen over the last many years. They also have had strong insider cheerleaders.

Here we have the same Congress dictating to Canadians on developing Nukes - hmmm, right, like it is quite a normal thing to say for a tiny populated country stuck between two nuclear superpowers. Well, maybe the Congress had a fundraiser and drank a little too much samohonka and got to remembering the good old days of Bandera, don't know, but in the morning this type of nuke'ish thinking became public discourse - and did not Freeland recently say something along these lines?

You just can't make this stuff up.

Ukrainian Canadian Congress calls for Canada to develop nuclear weapons​


Fat Man atomic bomb used on Nagasaki


Fat Man atomic bomb used on NagasakiCourtesy Wikipedia
https://www.westernstandard.news/author/western-standard-desk
Western Standard News Services

Published on:
06 Apr 2025, 8:00 am

The Ukrainian Canadian Congress is urging Canada to establish its own nuclear weapons program, arguing that the country needs to protect itself from both Russian aggression and potential threats from the United States.

Blacklock's Reporter says the organization released a National Policy Guide this week recommending that Canada develop an independent nuclear deterrent.

“Even if the Trump era proves to be an anomaly in American history, Canada’s security must never again be at the mercy of the shifting political winds in a handful of U.S. swing states,” the Guide stated.

“To credibly defend our sovereignty against two neighboring nuclear powers, Canada should create its own deterrent.”

The guide warned that Canada is more dependent on the U.S. for its security than European Union countries and the United Kingdom. It argued that the country’s geographic position, once an advantage, now poses a liability.

“To our north, we border a hostile imperialist terrorist state, Russia. To our south, we border a Trump-led America that threatens our sovereignty and economy. Both are nuclear powers.”:lol:

While Canada has nuclear expertise, it has never developed its own weapons program. The country supplied uranium for the 1945 Manhattan Project and constructed the world’s first experimental nuclear reactor.

Currently, only three NATO nations possess nuclear warheads: the U.S., the U.K., and France. According to the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons, six other countries have nuclear arsenals: China, India, Israel, North Korea, Pakistan, and Russia.

“The Congress believes Canada and the free world are at a turning point,” the Guide stated. “Canada’s sovereignty and economy are under threat from the United States, which was once our closest ally. While the Trump administration threatens Canada, it also seeks to appease the greatest threat to global peace and security, the Russian Federation.”

The guide described Russia’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine as a “genocidal war of aggression” and warned of a growing threat to Canada’s sovereignty in the Arctic and to NATO allies in Europe.

“The future of Canada’s freedom and Europe’s stability depends on our ability to defend our sovereignty and national interest,” it stated.

The Congress also urged Canada to raise defence spending to 3% of Gross Domestic Product, surpassing the NATO minimum of 2%. Canada currently allocates 1.37% of GDP to defence.

The Congress argued that Canada can “no longer rely on the United States as a security partner” and must prioritize national defence.

It pointed to the Trump administration’s March decision to suspend military aid and intelligence-sharing with Ukraine, calling it an act of blackmail.

“If the Trump administration can cut off one ally facing an existential threat, it can certainly do the same to another, such as Canada,” the Guide warned.

There you have it, speaking of "our sovereignty" as if they, The Ukrainian Canadian Congress of Mordor, indeed speak for all Canadians.

I can imagine Trump reading this, this Policy Guild over his coffee and chocking with laughter, thinking Canadians are trying to grow big kahunas and arming themselves with nukes against them. And they say Canada has a tariff problems, Canadians do have a Nazi problem.

This is really like waking up in OZ.
 
Before the server fail and lost posts, this extensive article on Mark Carney was posted, but I can't remember by who. Sorry. Credit belongs to that person.


I responded that this section on the Club of Rome caught my attention.

Though the Climate Change narrative has been around for decades now – originally monikered as “Global Warming,” it was members from the Club of Rome who really go the ball rolling.

Implemented through decades of false science, bribery, bullying, and coercion, the current phase of the Great Climate Hoax now entails jiggy-rigging the financial system’s plumbing so that trillions of dollars worth of money can flow into the globalists’ coffers.

To achieve such an ambitious undertaking requires the craftiest, shrewdest, and most cunning trickster of them all to pull off. This is were Mark Carney talents enter center stage.

I then went to look at Aurelio Peccei who, along with Alexander King, were the founders of the CoR. I then found this article that shows he was an enthusiastic follower of Theosophy.


The evidence for the influence of occultism over the global environmental movement begins with the man who is credited with founding it: Maurice Strong.

Maurice Strong [See Michael BC's post for more on this guy] was a Canadian oilman, a rich entrepreneur whose involvement with the Club of Rome saw him rise to promote a worldwide green agenda based on fantasy, misanthropy, and the deliberate manipulation of public sentiment. He led the United Nations Environment Program, and later the World Economic Foundation. The mastermind behind the 1992 Rio Earth summit, he is credited with the creation of the phrase “climate change.”

A biography on his own website proudly claims that Strong “has played a unique and critical role in globalizing the environmental movement.”

What is the Club of Rome?

The Club of Rome was founded at David Rockefeller’s estate in Bellagio in 1968. Towards the end of his life, Rockefeller responded in the affirmative to a charge that he and his family were seeking the establishment of a world government:

"Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."

The Club of Rome promotes a planetary agenda of technocratic control. It has described the collapse of industrial society and the death by starvation of two thirds of the human population as beneficial. How can it be that this is not common knowledge? Rockefeller explained in his memoirs that such a project would have been impossible without the collusion of the press:
"We are grateful to The Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years… It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years.​

But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supernational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries."​


The fruits of Rockefeller’s garden

The club which Rockefeller funded and hosted was led by a man called Aurelio Peccei, who “with Alexander King, the Scottish Head of Science at the OECD [Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development]… convened a meeting of European scientists in Rome.”

These two men commissioned a computer model to predict the forthcoming collapse of industrial civilization – due to overpopulation. The model was wrong – but this did not deter them from publishing in 1972 a manifesto for a new Malthusian agenda of depopulation.

Called “The Limits to Growth,” it inspired much of the current Green agenda of deindustrialization, abortion, and the concept of humanity as a problem to be solved. The book continues to inspire a movement whose agenda has always relied on the deliberate distortion of reality. The Club of Rome, in its 1991 report “The First Global Revolution,” states:

"In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself."​


The co-founder of the Club of Rome, Aurelio Peccei, was an occultist, who made no secret of his devotion to the cult of Theosophy. As noted Finnish epidemiologist Mikko Paunio notes, Peccei announced his views in print in 1977: “Aurelio Peccei’s 1977 book ‘The Quality of Man’ reveals his worldview based on Theosophy and the discovery of the inner self.”

The organization which was foundational to the global environmental movement was formed, therefore, by a man inspired by the fraudulent cult of Theosophy.

Three elements of a revolutionary cult

The cult of climate change and the general Green agenda is often presented as the vanguard of reason, the claims of which rest on settled science.

In fact, it is a curious blend of fantasy and fetish. Its leaders were inspired by make believe and saw in science and technology an instrument of control – and persuasion – which could deliver to their managerial elite a future society granting unlimited power to the “masters of the future.”

"'The models are convenient fictions that provide something very useful.' – Dr David Frame, climate modeler, Oxford University."​

Global environmentalism is a dangerous cult whose claims of apocalypse, and of the efficacy of the solutions technology presents, are as fantastical as the beliefs which inspired them. It is a revolutionary movement, and describes itself as such. It is a fusion of New Age beliefs, technology worship, and personal vanity. There is also a great deal of money to be made.

The spirit of revolution

These beliefs are esoteric – deeply personal convictions of a significant wisdom to be found in some cosmic inner self. They are occult – their true meaning hidden behind jargon and propaganda directed at the masses, their actual significance reserved only for the initiates. “It doesn’t matter what is true, it only matters what people believe is true,” stated Paul Watson, co-founder of Greenpeace.

Revolutions do not take place due to popular sentiment. They are the result of a disaffected segment of the intellectual culture attracting sufficient financial backing to force its will upon a general population. This is exactly the case with the “First Global Revolution” of the environmental movement.

Following revolution, it is the ordinary people, not the elites, who are murdered and dispossessed. Revolution has been romanticized; it is another fantasy in which wicked designs seek their disguise. According to the “First Global Revolution” report, Club of Rome members “believe humanity requires a common motivation, namely a common adversary in order to realize world government. It does not matter if this common enemy is a real one or… one invented for the purpose.”

The French Revolution, the Bolsheviks and the Maoists, and the cult of “Brother Number One” Pol Pot all shared this characteristic. The Jacobins killed hundreds of thousands of ordinary French, to fewer than 1700 aristocrats. The total victim count of communism in the 20th century has been estimated at a conservative 100 million souls – by the Marxist historian Eric Hobsbawm.

Revolution is a manifesto of murder fictionalized as liberation. This barbarism is the result of every utopian attempt to make a religion of man. The environmental revolution is different – it has declared man the enemy before it has even begun.

Maurice Strong and the Club of Rome

Maurice Strong fantasized about causing the collapse of industrial society during an interview in 1990. Titled “The Wizard of Baca Grande,” [this site might be more stable] it took place on his extensive New Age compound in Colorado. Speaking to writer Daniel Wood, Strong asked “What if a small group of world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the Earth comes from the actions of the rich countries?”

"So, in order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about? [Emphasis added]"​

Strong was influential in the Club of Rome, moving on to lead the newly minted United Nations Environment Program, and to chair the Rio Earth summit. He was a founding member of the World Economic Forum, whose Foundation he went on to lead.

His obituaries celebrate his commitment to globalizing the environmental movement.

This is an issue which has attracted much attention before, but with the recent work of Finnish scientist Mikko Paunio, the existence of a “nature pantheist cult” at the center of the environmental movement is difficult to disclaim.

Paunio recently featured in an interview with LifeSiteNews’ John Henry Westen to discuss what he calls the existence of a nature pantheist – and Malthusian – influence at the highest levels of international environmental policy.

Paunio documents how Strong moved on from the UN to the World Economic Forum.

"Early on, Klaus Schwab recruited the by far ever most influential unelected UN environment official, Maurice Strong, a wealthy, un-educated Canadian industrialist (1929–2015), to head the WEF foundation.
Maurice Strong was the central figure in pushing forward the sustainable development agenda since the UN’s first environmental summit in Stockholm in 1972. He was also an inveterate occultist and esotericist."​

A conspiracy of collapse?

Why do one man’s dreams matter at all? This was a man with the power to make his dreams real.

A 2015 profile of Maurice Strong in The National Post notes that his “green agenda now blankets the globe, from the UN through national governments to municipalities,” an agenda directed by a man whose dreams were a living nightmare for humanity.

"In his 2000 autobiography, ‘Where on Earth Are We Going?’ Strong projected that, in 2031, ‘the human tragedy’ would be ‘on a scale hitherto unimagined.’ He wrote that the brightest prospect lay in forecasts that two-thirds of the world’s already diminished population might be wiped out.​
He described this as ‘a glimmer of hope for the future of our species and its potential for regeneration,’ thus betraying a distinctly ambivalent attitude towards the humanity he claimed to be so desperate to save."​

There is nothing conspiratorial in quoting the words of Maurice Strong, who is lauded by his followers as the founding father of the global environmental movement. His dark fantasies have a wide appeal among people who presumably consider themselves the beneficiaries of this collapse. Some will be simply satisfied by the idea of a global vengeance upon humanity. In this promise, Green utopianism offers a matchless blood sacrifice to its most ardent believers.

Esoteric futurism and the problem of humanity

Claims of occult influence are dismissed by mainstream sources on the grounds that Maurice Strong and Aurelio Peccei did not practice rituals in some sort of temple. This is not the basis of the argument. What matters is the inspiration for an ideology which, without the cuddly green window dressing, remains open about its definition of humanity as the enemy.

There is no argument that Strong, Peccei, and their organizations were indeed inspired in part by the influences drawn from the occult tradition of Theosophy. This is a means of making man a god, through the cultivation of the inner self to the point of a Gnostic awakening. He was cosmic in his outlook, saying, “I believe the great frontier of the future is the frontier between the individual spirit and the Spirit, the cosmos.”

He built a New Age compound in which to live, believing with his wife that this settlement of crystal gazers and mystics such as Shirley MacLaine [Link] was a blueprint for a post-apocalyptic culture. Look beyond the bizarre nature of his living arrangements, and marvel at the mind of anyone who believes their own fantasy world is a scalable model for worldwide human society.

It is only through fantasy that such things seem possible at all. What these fantasies betray is the vanity of the fantasist. They are appointed, chosen in a sense, as was Strong by the burning of a bush [see the Baca Grande interview].

Personal fantasy as a route to power is the central point. This is a means of reassessing the seemingly suicidal environmental movement as a large-scale instrument to enact the private desires of a very small number of people.

A visionary misanthrope

These desires are clearly infused with a sense of mission. Salvation and destruction are apocalyptic themes, whose presence is maintained by deliberately manipulated models of ever impending, never arriving, disaster.

Finally, those directed by the inner light wish to lead us into a future compassed by their fantasies of control. A rational madness inspires the believer in the inner self, being directed inwards by the disappointing discord of attempts at democracy.

From the very beginning, Maurice Strong was determined to silence other voices than his own. Towards the end of the first United Nations Conference on the Environment in Stockholm, 1972, he tired of the endless discussion:

"As the wrangling between delegates stretched into the predawn hours, the secretary-general of the conference, Maurice Strong, abruptly pulled the plug on their audio. The gesture shook participants and gave Mr. Strong an opening to get the conference back on track."​

The track of this movement was laid by a man who demanded action, not words. The action he demanded is clearly outlined by himself.

Inspired by some demon, he was driven to encourage the coordinated collapse of civilization, and the rule of the remnant humanity by a cult of wealthy technocrats.

I then made a follow-up post mentioning this part had relevance. It ties Pierre Trudeau to the Club of Rome.

The first full meeting of the Club of Rome was at the Accademia dei Lincei in Rome, Italy in 1968. It was considered a "monumental flop". The second full meeting was sponsored by Pierre Trudeau and the Canadian Government and held in April, 1971 at the Seigniory Club in Chateau Montebello, Quebec. At this meeting, "members heard the outline of a global “Systems Dynamics” model that would become the basis for The Limits to Growth", which was published in 1972.

Along with that Voyageur found showing Mark Carney is an old protégé of Strong's, Canada might have a much more intense battle between wishful thinking and reality.
 
I've been seeing a lot of these videos surfacing. This problem is worse in the UK, but it seems to me like they are using Islam(and other awful religions) as part of this hostile takeover of the Canada, and the west. These muslims are so indoctrinated by this braindead ideology that they are basically beyond redemption. Nothing can be done in terms of rehabilitation. Any act against their gospel is an act of hostility. Every action they take is justified and reinforced by their dogma.




I would consider that the roots of the islamic(and others) religion would be 4th D STS, and that they proliferated it in to humanity a long time ago. We know that time does not exist for them as it does us, I would imagine part of this 3rd Density farming that they do involves parasitically infecting the host population with ideologies like this, watching them grow over thousands of years, and twisting them ever so slightly to fulfill the wishes of 4th D.

The issue is now that Canada is basically completely infiltrated with these people who have been taught to not only hate us, but that conquering us is part of their religious mission, factor that in with the fact the government is subsidizing all of it (with our money), and all of their soulless sycophantic abominations supporting them, this is only going to go one way in my opinion.

I understand the necessity of waking people up and how important friction is, but I honestly couldn't have imagined something as insidiously evil as the sh*t going on in todays world.

Are we supposed to somehow live in harmony with these people? I wonder if they are being paid to pray in the streets.

It doesn't take long before they start voting each other in to power, it is already happening on a very large scale in Canada. Everybody gets to vote for their own self interests except for actual Canadians.

I am trying to understand what exactly is supposed to happen here. Are we supposed to unite as Canadians and try to turn the tide? Wait until Cataclysm happens? Civil war? Revolution?

Maybe the world cleansing itself is the inevitable truth that everything is just going to get worse until the system is destroyed.

Laughable
 
I've been seeing a lot of these videos surfacing. This problem is worse in the UK, but it seems to me like they are using Islam(and other awful religions) as part of this hostile takeover of the Canada, and the west. These muslims are so indoctrinated by this braindead ideology that they are basically beyond redemption. Nothing can be done in terms of rehabilitation. Any act against their gospel is an act of hostility. Every action they take is justified and reinforced by their dogma.




I would consider that the roots of the islamic(and others) religion would be 4th D STS, and that they proliferated it in to humanity a long time ago. We know that time does not exist for them as it does us, I would imagine part of this 3rd Density farming that they do involves parasitically infecting the host population with ideologies like this, watching them grow over thousands of years, and twisting them ever so slightly to fulfill the wishes of 4th D.

The issue is now that Canada is basically completely infiltrated with these people who have been taught to not only hate us, but that conquering us is part of their religious mission, factor that in with the fact the government is subsidizing all of it (with our money), and all of their soulless sycophantic abominations supporting them, this is only going to go one way in my opinion.

I understand the necessity of waking people up and how important friction is, but I honestly couldn't have imagined something as insidiously evil as the sh*t going on in todays world.

Are we supposed to somehow live in harmony with these people? I wonder if they are being paid to pray in the streets.

It doesn't take long before they start voting each other in to power, it is already happening on a very large scale in Canada. Everybody gets to vote for their own self interests except for actual Canadians.

I am trying to understand what exactly is supposed to happen here. Are we supposed to unite as Canadians and try to turn the tide? Wait until Cataclysm happens? Civil war? Revolution?

Maybe the world cleansing itself is the inevitable truth that everything is just going to get worse until the system is destroyed.

Laughable

Yeah, ethnic tensions and mass immigration is by design. The conservative White European backlash against it is also by design. The backlash is totally understandable, too, given the insane housing market, flooded job market, not to mention all the child stabbings, car rammings, rape gangs, etc. But the backlash is by also design, or at least amplified. I think the likes of Ezra Levant and Rebel News are paid to basically turn up the heat on the whole culture war.

Some would say immigrants are flooding in for economic and demographic reasons. In the recent session it was mentioned the world lost about a billion people, so that's a pretty massive shortfall. There's also also plain old conspiracy to get Whitey, via interbreeding or the Kalergi plan, or White replacement, or encouraging White self-hatred, or destroying Western civilization, etc... all of which is documented. At any rate, weakening those with Kantekkian origins seems important.

When focusing on the influx of immigrants, tho, I do also see a lot of people getting 'stampeded' - explicitly warned against by the C's - into White nationalism, emotional reactivity and race hatred, missing the fact that this is right outta the PTB playbook. Create divisions in the population, then set them against each other. Fight it out in the trenches, plebs, but ignore the ones pulling the strings. Some right-wingers do have an analysis focused on the PTB and psychopaths, but most just look at 'all those dirty, inferior brown people' as their main enemy.

So what is supposed to happen? The general idea from the 4D/PTB level looks to me like a strategy of tension - create as much suffering as possible while preventing total collapse. They need some degree of economic and societal function to build their digital gulag to rule us in 4D. I also don't put much stock in revolution in Canada, or civil war. The population is too passive. I think an apocalypse is more likely.

What to do about it? For me personally, I've learned about it, am paying attention to it, but I also do my best not to get stampeded into this new Clash of Civilizations narrative or let the emotions run amok. Even though my rent and food prices are insane here, and I deeply dislike what's happening, I'm not about to sign up for any sort of race war. So it's not necessarily just waiting for a catastrophe, or a civil war. I'm trying to stay focused on what matters - improving myself in my own little zone of life here and trying to be of service to others where I can. Seems that's all I can do. As Laura said, the only way out is up.
 
they are using Islam(and other awful religions) as part of this hostile takeover of the Canada, and the west.
These people (religious zealots) are a plague. They are the most dangerous. It's hard not to feel frustration and/or hatred toward them, knowing what their agenda is... I particularly despise the branches of Islam that force women to cover their heads (or more). That's when I start grinding my teeth...

Create divisions in the population, then set them against each other.
Indeed, that plan has been slowly brewing for a couple of decades now. The soup is almost ready!

For me personally, I've learned about it, am paying attention to it, but I also do my best not to get stampeded into this new Clash of Civilizations narrative or let the emotions run amok.
I second that. This seems like the best way to deal with this situation.
 
Back
Top Bottom