I watched the video in transcript form (I don't like videos!).I better understand the context in which an army employee caught Brian H. with military officers during a meeting. There's definitely a lot of background to it.
I don't wish to comment on this background. It belongs to a past when drug trafficking was firmly under US control. In my opinion, such things attract covetous eyes, and I presume that during Biden's presidency, outsiders gained control of these operations. This is just my personal hypothesis.
In any case, an ordinary person (the army employee) is walking around a military base and surprises high-ranking officers, in the company of Brian H., Charlie Kirk's head of security, shortly before he was assassinated. Here is a bit from the Candace video:
"... I I know how these meetings work. These are the meetings that are had um ahead of an operation.
I will jump a bit; another interesting bit is the following:
And you know when you get to a certain level in business, they offer you what they say it what is the expression? It's either the silver or the lead. you take the money or you take the bullet.
I don't think it's quite so black and white, but it's possible that things have come to that. This process, which
wasn't absolute,
has become so.
A reader writing to Candace tells him:
there are a lot of incredible men in the military. It is always at the top where corruption happens. And I hope that you take away from this that we are infiltrated as a nation
we certainly cannot trust the government to take care of us if they didn't take care of Charlie Kirk
Ultimately, the background to Charlie Kirk's assassination appears to stem from government infiltration. This distinction seems critical.
In my opinion, this infiltration occurred during Biden's presidency, a term in which he allegedly outsourced the entire country to foreign and negative interests. Israel played a heavy role in this—unless, of course, Israel was part of the package that was sold to "foreign" interests.
Essentially, it's a competition for control and a share of the US. No one would know for sure, but it's possible that many institutions have fallen under "foreign" control. Of course, Israel would have "taken" everything. But then again, Israel is also heavily dependent on the US and is a kind of NATO satellite. Why wouldn't Israel be part of the package, after all? The foreign interests that got their hands on it would use it as they saw fit.
jewishjournal.com
:
