I also wondered if this was a hoax after giving it some time. Those that where indicated as being paid where the targets perhaps.
Candace Owens: From TPUSA Conservative Activist to Powerful Voice for Truth
- Thread starter wodasi
- Start date
Just to clarify my last post, here are the ones accused of taking money to call Candace EVIL. Not some of the most popular people but a false smear campaign none the less. It did make me question a few of these people who its good to hear its fakery. These remarks are so extreme however! Way over the top so it does make me wonder. What is really going on here? I know a few claim to be earnest Christians and Candace speaking of dreams was balsamy among other things similar
Last edited:
Blasphemy. This is their claim anyway.
Caught Candace's part III tonight - it's like fiction, you just can't make this stuff up, yet it falls under her inquiry to connect what might never been connected.
Tonight's had its focus not only on Erika (her missing 2008 year for instance), yet more so on mother Lori. Oh boy. The C;s were asked about Erika, yet Lori seems as sketchy as they get. Lori's dozens of LLC's coupled with the Erpenbeck family, wherein one of the sons appears on all the documents (marriage, LLC's) for over 20 years. Yet parts of the family seems pretty dark (reported in the press), and the father Tony is simply unbelievable.
Reaching for an analogy, Candace can be seen as locksmith who sometimes misses the mark, who may use the wrong tool and may look to being approaching the wrong lock, yet she hits individual tumblers that fall into place and then the next and the next. She keeps at it.
What a world.
Edit: Part II
Tonight's had its focus not only on Erika (her missing 2008 year for instance), yet more so on mother Lori. Oh boy. The C;s were asked about Erika, yet Lori seems as sketchy as they get. Lori's dozens of LLC's coupled with the Erpenbeck family, wherein one of the sons appears on all the documents (marriage, LLC's) for over 20 years. Yet parts of the family seems pretty dark (reported in the press), and the father Tony is simply unbelievable.
Reaching for an analogy, Candace can be seen as locksmith who sometimes misses the mark, who may use the wrong tool and may look to being approaching the wrong lock, yet she hits individual tumblers that fall into place and then the next and the next. She keeps at it.
What a world.
Edit: Part II
Bride of Charlie continued and it sounds like it won't end with #3:
Hmm - nothing suspicious about that . . . (money laundering anyone?)
More to come on Monday.
Several things stand out -
- associations with gambling - lottery tickets, slot machines, horse racing
- Lori's multitude of LLCs
- Lori's inexplicable "tech" proficiency
- Lori/Tyler Bowyer are business partners and have been for some time (TB arranged Charlie/Erika meeting)
- the Erpenbeck missing mortgage money scandal and TPUSA branching off into real estate (same play being formulated?)
- Erika likely being transformed into super Christian (for the purpose of snaring Charlie?) via an 8 month "training" episode
- the verifiable lies Erika has made that she maybe isn't really aware possibly because she's been transformed into a she-bot (my take)
Hmm - nothing suspicious about that . . . (money laundering anyone?)
More to come on Monday.
I did not really feel I had time to watch the first three episodes, but ended up doing it anyway... It only takes so and so long, right. Double speed, 1.5 or whatever, but there there are also segments where I wanted to verify, go deeper, or stop and think.
At the beginning, Candace reads the viewpoint of Elizabeth Lane on who Erica is, and I looked up this person on X. There I found an interview of a former British police officer who had been onto the misdoings of the UK elite and was intimidated into silence. Though not Candace related directly it does indicated what pressures some investigator whether they are in the US, the UK or France (to mention examples) are probably under, as well as the kind of people who resist even if they end up being able to do very little.
As I was viewing the Candace series, I thought about this excerpt:
Session 27 September 2025
By her example Candace shows people how to research a topic, follow leads, consult sources and put together the dots. Maybe some will later move on to make their own discoveries?
At the beginning, Candace reads the viewpoint of Elizabeth Lane on who Erica is, and I looked up this person on X. There I found an interview of a former British police officer who had been onto the misdoings of the UK elite and was intimidated into silence. Though not Candace related directly it does indicated what pressures some investigator whether they are in the US, the UK or France (to mention examples) are probably under, as well as the kind of people who resist even if they end up being able to do very little.
No wonder the UK establishment was reluctant to do much about grooming gangs, but could hide behind the headlines they grabbed.
As I was viewing the Candace series, I thought about this excerpt:
Session 27 September 2025
What Candace has to say might help some people to look before they leap.
By her example Candace shows people how to research a topic, follow leads, consult sources and put together the dots. Maybe some will later move on to make their own discoveries?
Trending content
-
-
Thread 'Coronavirus Pandemic: Apocalypse Now! Or exaggerated scare story?'
- wanderingthomas
Replies: 30K -
-
