Candace Owens

If there is a person of those famous and outspoken people with something to say in the west who went back to (the sometimes maybe fundamental/dogmatic?) religious dominations recently, who I think could also have it in her to question some core things in that regard, than I think it is Owens. She already said that she is trying to collect and read the oldest bibles she can get a hold of because she is aware that a lot of rewriting was going on! A dangerous route especially for true believers since enquiries in that direction can lead to uncomfortable truths about “the realities in the bible“ rather quickly.

Having said that, in this day and age, especially in the west, I would argue going back to religion even if those people get too fundamental about it is a lot healthier spiritually and morally speaking than quite literally further following what can only be described as downright satanic cults that are rampant.
 
Candace Owens is going in deep (like she normally does with an investigation). She's looking for Jean-Michel Trogneux in America in the 1960s because Brigitte Macron has said in a previous interview that she "celebrated the moon landing with Americans".

She may have found him - taking part in an MKUltra Program - of all things! At Stanford! His profile sure does look similar to the photo of an earlier military photo of Jean-Michel Trogneau. Weirdly the Macron lawsuit mentions MKUltra multiple times, and Candace says that the old adage " A kicked dog will holler", made her stop and pay attention... She says she's about to do a Part 2 Series on Brigitte in a couple of weeks time.

 
On Russel Brand I personally find him too fast speaking and high energy in his content for my tastes. However, from what I have seen I do believe his current resistance against the system is genuine, even if he has his issues.

It is also worth considering that though his manner of presentation may be off putting to some people there may be further benefits in him doing so.
There is now a generation of people raised on phones and social media in combination with ever rising attention deficit disorder among younger people. Teachers struggling to keep the attention of children in their classes. Brand’s bombastic high energy shortform presentation is the kind of content these people can actually pay attention to and process. Thus provides an opportunity for those whom the more commonplace longform truth seeking content is too slow paced and unengaging. As a consequence, the analysis and depth of the information is reduced but it can act to help wake people up who may otherwise continue to be blind to reality.
 
Candace Owens is going in deep (like she normally does with an investigation). She's looking for Jean-Michel Trogneux in America in the 1960s because Brigitte Macron has said in a previous interview that she "celebrated the moon landing with Americans".

She may have found him - taking part in an MKUltra Program - of all things! At Stanford! His profile sure does look similar to the photo of an earlier military photo of Jean-Michel Trogneau. Weirdly the Macron lawsuit mentions MKUltra multiple times, and Candace says that the old adage " A kicked dog will holler", made her stop and pay attention... She says she's about to do a Part 2 Series on Brigitte in a couple of weeks time.


She certainly found something interesting - that a "Jean-Marie Trogneux" was a crew member of a ship in the 60s that docked in the US - but I think it's a stretch to try and identify Brigitte/JMT as having been a participant in the Stanford experiment. Still, it was interesting to learn that that experiment was most likely contrived to produce the very effect that everyone remembers it for: that 'literally anyone' could become an evil prison guard.
 
The first segment in this episode really brings home to you how entrenched pathocracy has become in western Europe:


One of France's top journalists/anchors - one who literally flew with Macron to DC last week, and whose interview with him upon returning to Paris produced this viral clip of Macron describing Russia as "a predatory, cannibalistic ogre," and in which he said he is suing Candace Owens to "defend my wife's honour and to enforce the truth" - is named Darius Rochebin.

Owens discovered that Rochebin was, until 2020, the top journalist/anchor in Switzerland, when he suddenly "parted amicably" from the Swiss state radio/TV network following an investigative report by Le Temps exposing Rochebin's long history of being a sexual predator, specifically targeting and grooming male teenagers interested in media & politics, and thereby developing a cadre of willing sycophants.

There were apparently no charges, and no trial: the Swiss network, RTS, just said "we've taken care of it," while Rochebin sued Le Temps for defamation... until he didn't! He simply withdrew his lawsuit. Instead, he moved to Paris, where he was welcomed with open arms in Macronistan, and has quickly earned the court's favour there.

In the anglosphere, particularly in the US, the man's career would be toast. Yet in France/EU, Rochebin is so assured of the security of his position, he maintains the highest public profile, including an account on X.

By the way, Rochebin isn't his real surname. It's Khoshbin, and it appears to be of Jewish-Iranian origin.
 
I think it is a bit of wishful thinking to expect any public figure to somehow hit the bullseye as far as the hyperdimensional influences over politics and all that.

But the reason I like Candace is that she sort of did hit the bullseye as far as what people can digest and make sense of just purely by politics and connections.


The clues that the elites have a system of beliefs based on domination and tends to be satanic and anti christian is a great aproximation.

One thing is to rob a bank and enjoy the profits and get cars and chicks, another is to rob a bank and do child sacrifice because you intentionally crave power. their beliefs gears them in that direction or is it a religion?




As far as her guests,namely Kanye West she explained that he was drugged like Britney, like Jackson, like Monrroe, like Jordan Peterson, and many more. so she is directly saying that there is a coordinated standard proceidure for people who reach a certain height in order to control them.
Benzodiazepine and all those drugs.
Coupled with the Epstein blackmail operation and you have both holliwood and DC under your control.

She is saying that, added the element of satanic fetishism and purposeful erosion of christian values through culture.

She's putting pieces together but it is a longshot to expect her to to talk aliens and stuff.


I think congresswoman MTG is aware of the sessions though, she spoke about the heart attack space lasers very close to that session, i have a feeling she is aware.

Meanwhile Nick Fuentes is just screaming and trying to save the white race by NOT having any children, NOT marrying, because he likes to drive his car around.. that makes sense.
and probably being neurotic and negative doesn't help his chances with females either, but that's his business.
 
She's putting pieces together but it is a longshot to expect her to to talk aliens and stuff.
Tucker is already talking about the hyperdimensional control over the "elites" in Christian terms. Since Candace is Christian too, she may do something similar. And either of the two could at some point connect the "interdimensional aliens" to the Christian ideas of demonic influences.
 
Watched more of Candace over the weeks including some of the latest stuff two days ago. Unsurprisingly, I think Candace runs the risk of going overboard in her analysis and thinking. There are traps everywhere and there is a program for everyone. And high profile people like her are likely especially at risk for that, most especially if they value their own thinking maybe a bit too much and don’t network enough. And obviously, she should expect that intelligence agencies will try their best to feed her with misinformation and derailments. For example via the E-mails she gets from her community.

Here are a couple of points that point towards the risk of Candace going overboard IMO:

- She currently seems to be somewhat “obsessed“ with the Stanford Experiment ever since she found the lookalike picture of a prisoner who looks like “Brigitte“. Frankly, as soon as I first saw that picture I compared the ear features of that lookalike with Brigitte and found it is highly likely that it doesn’t match, unless Brigitte changed those parts of her ear too via surgery, which I find unlikely. Later the C‘s also said that it is a lookalike. Also, I find it a bit disappointing that Candace (nor her community?) apparently did not think about just comparing those ear features before even going much further in thinking “that it might be Brigitte“.

- She keeps repeating that everything that happens out there especially in politics doesn’t only seem to be, but actually is, “just a stage“. Sometimes suggesting that some if not many of the political players are, quite literally, actors. Yes, in a sense that might be true, even for many of those people, but it is easy to go overboard here and start to think flatly, like “nothing is real“ everyone is just acting. I‘m not sure, but I think Candace is not going that far (yet?).

- She mentions that the moonlandings are fake in her opinion and that his community isn’t ready for those “revelations“ yet. Another topic where many people get derailed and some start to think rather flatly.

- She mentions the freemasons. I think it is likely that she could go overboard there too.

And of course points like the above can and likely will easily lead to discrediting campaigns against what Candace has to say in general and especially in areas like Israel.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom