Cassiopaean Chronology/Cosmology

I updated cosmology site with latest information and made few minor changes.
  • Based on the latest C's comments on the date of Atlantis destruction due to crystals becoming sentient. I ended Atlantis civilization period with 10 K BCE period ( before 8.5 K BCE).
    • Based on Pierre's YD SOTT article I moved YD date to 10.9 K BCE. Before I put it as a 10.6 K BCE. probably I took it from Main stream sources. After that C' gave few data points Göbekli Tepe (10.7 - 10/5 K BCE), Final war (aka crystal destruction) to 10.9 K BCE. Here few considerations are made:
      • Plato Prehistorian version also hints at final war before the flooding.
      • Final cleanup job is done by comets after the human drama is over (aka Athenians vs Atlantean) and that triggers migrations, though higher density tend to give advance warnings to the receptive folks.
  • Some of the links are pointing to Forum session links, they are giving 'CORS' issues. So I moved them to display as different tab in the browser.
  • As usual, created new downloadable pdf for the diagram and you can expand the image and see the hints. The mouse cursor doesn't change to hand from pointer due to some complexity. Hopefully, I will fix it later. Here is the site.
Cassiopaean Cosmology

Any feedback and suggestions are welcome.
 
Benjamin said:
For some reason I cannot download it. Nothing I do (signing out, signing into Google) has any effect.
Click to expand...
Thanks for letting me know. I forgot to change permissions when I changed the file day back. It should download without logging into google. Try now and let me know how it went.
Benjamin said:
So I thought that this chart, with some reworking, could be made into a larger format poster.
Click to expand...
Yes, Needs to do some graphic work.
 
There is one thing that may require adjustment:

If the comet cluster has a periodicity of about 3600 years and there were 400-500 phantom years added to our calendar in the 1st millenium, then the last visit of the comet cluster would have been around 1200 BC or 1100 BC (not 1600 BC). And this does coincide with the Bronze Age collapse around 1100 BC.

Earlier visits of the comet cluster probably also need to be adjusted by 400-500 years.

Another potential addition could be that the companion star may have made its closest approach to the inner solar system during the Maunder Minimum, as discussed here. Though this has not been confirmed by the C's, I think.
 
seek10 said:
I updated cosmology site with latest information and made few minor changes.
  • Based on the latest C's comments on the date of Atlantis destruction due to crystals becoming sentient. I ended Atlantis civilization period with 10 K BCE period ( before 8.5 K BCE).
    • Based on Pierre's YD SOTT article I moved YD date to 10.9 K BCE. Before I put it as a 10.6 K BCE. probably I took it from Main stream sources. After that C' gave few data points Göbekli Tepe (10.7 - 10/5 K BCE), Final war (aka crystal destruction) to 10.9 K BCE. Here few considerations are made:
      • Plato Prehistorian version also hints at final war before the flooding.
      • Final cleanup job is done by comets after the human drama is over (aka Athenians vs Atlantean) and that triggers migrations, though higher density tend to give advance warnings to the receptive folks.
  • Some of the links are pointing to Forum session links, they are giving 'CORS' issues. So I moved them to display as different tab in the browser.
  • As usual, created new downloadable pdf for the diagram and you can expand the image and see the hints. The mouse cursor doesn't change to hand from pointer due to some complexity. Hopefully, I will fix it later. Here is the site.
Cassiopaean Cosmology

Any feedback and suggestions are welcome.
Click to expand...
Hey I just saw your chart - it's great!

I would suggest to tweak the colors a bit, ie:

- the dark brown frame does not serve anything else than circumventing the picture: could have something more neutral
- the gray boxes could work with a lighter gray

Overall, the brown frame, the dark gray, and the arrows going down, on the left, are all very colored. The arrows appear too heavy - but as those are important, I would lessen the importance of various elements around; this way, you would preserve the identities taught by the arrows (and their present colors).

You may decrease the emphasis of the markers (double circles): technically, what you would need here would just be "a tick" on the axis. I find it quite heavy and adding to the whole heavy impression. So, could be, a dot of some sort, or simply removing the double circle. if you would like to preserve the double circles, you may decrease the overall size of both, and have a lighter color.

Could be, the very last era (Christian), would make it with a lighter background; the purple is a bit dark, if you look, in comparison with the other era's.

Your chart is great and the above are suggestions. If you have a look at the above points, and decide it's improving the pic, that's cool.
 
Benjamin said:
I love this chart. Really excellent work seek10! :clap:

For some reason I cannot download it. Nothing I do (signing out, signing into Google) has any effect. So I thought that this chart, with some reworking, could be made into a larger format poster. A Christmas donation goodie?
Click to expand...
I made some minor changes to the content of the site and created minimalist frame for the poster.
palestine said:
I would suggest to tweak the colors a bit, ie:

- the dark brown frame does not serve anything else than circumventing the picture: could have something more neutral
- the gray boxes could work with a lighter gray

Overall, the brown frame, the dark gray, and the arrows going down, on the left, are all very colored. The arrows appear too heavy - but as those are important, I would lessen the importance of various elements around; this way, you would preserve the identities taught by the arrows (and their present colors).

You may decrease the emphasis of the markers (double circles): technically, what you would need here would just be "a tick" on the axis. I find it quite heavy and adding to the whole heavy impression. So, could be, a dot of some sort, or simply removing the double circle. if you would like to preserve the double circles, you may decrease the overall size of both, and have a lighter color.

Could be, the very last era (Christian), would make it with a lighter background; the purple is a bit dark, if you look, in comparison with the other era's.
Click to expand...

I am not a professional with color sense or on posters. So any feedback is extremely helpful. I will make the change and post it.

A month back, I worked with forum member @Aliana about the possibility of changing colors and she suggested blue color and we worked on blue shades. Big Thank you to her spending time walking through the colors, shades etc.

Cass_Cosm_10252025_poster_blue.png


I went to my local printer to get it printed in few sizes for my original colors and as well as blue. One feedback I received is, blue shades is good for the website and it may not be that great for printing( printer guy also hinted that). Here are the pictures of the posters.

cosmology_colored.jpeg


Any
Cosmology_blue.jpeg
 

Attachments

axj said:
There is one thing that may require adjustment:

If the comet cluster has a periodicity of about 3600 years and there were 400-500 phantom years added to our calendar in the 1st millenium, then the last visit of the comet cluster would have been around 1200 BC or 1100 BC (not 1600 BC). And this does coincide with the Bronze Age collapse around 1100 BC.
Click to expand...

axj said:
Earlier visits of the comet cluster probably also need to be adjusted by 400-500 years.
Click to expand...

This is very good point. But this timeline stuff is 'can of worms' due to few reasons. That's why i started with 'As Cs confirmed' mode.
  • Gravity changes, its effect on carbon dating, which researcher used which data point to create their own timeline etc
  • Many cometary players and their gravitational interactions, each changing others trajectory and periodicity.
    • Giant comet remnants ( initially entered 20K YA) and then disintegrated leaving debris, 3600 years Oort cloud visitors, Venus, Mars each influencing others. If our criteria is to measured remnants ( like carbon dating of what was found in Icelandic samples, tree ring data etc. ), we will not know which cometary player has contributed to what. Worse, we don't even know where did this 20K YA giant comet guy came from? - asteroid belt or Oort Cloud or some thing else like Venus style.
    • Authors like M.M.Mendelkar who wrote 2300 BCE books, hypothesized that Giant comet remnants stayed in the orbit to hit around 2300 BCE, but it might have came 400 years earlier. Probably he was using Clube and Napier's paper dates.
      • In any case, I will remove known 400-500 years and so see how other data points gets effected.
  • Human players/controllers phantom years (intentional or not): Few non-main stream authors mentioned it, C's hinted at it. But, how many other times this happened?
  • This project started as a little side direction to my other project of figuring out Indian history that was not fitting into C's data points. w.r.t Indian history, there are very old Vedas. It becomes little more complicated there due to too many kingdoms', their own choices of era's and later day colonial interpolations ( or cross mapping) of Christian era dates and so on.
axj said:
Another potential addition could be that the companion star may have made its closest approach to the inner solar system during the Maunder Minimum, as discussed here. Though this has not been confirmed by the C's, I think.
Click to expand...
Need to look into it.
 
seek10 said:
In any case, I will remove known 400-500 years and so see how other data points gets effected
Click to expand...
Just realized that the 400-500 years actually need to be added to the dates, not subtracted. I saw that subtracting would put the comet cluster during the Bronze Age collapse (which made sense), but if these 400-500 years never happened, then 3600 years ago would be about 2000 BC or 2100 BC.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom