Cassiopaean Chronology/Cosmology

[seek10]

Cayce said he was a priest called 'Ra Ta', which is not the same as Ra (which according to the Law of One was the Ra of that channeling).

you may right. I will check later.

 

[palestine]

@seek10

1100AD Fragement impact <> Fragment impact

 

[nicklebleu]

My naïve take would be to try to absolutely discern which case is applicable to the various civilizational cleansings that we know of - but I smell a trap. Any suggestion, perspective, would be greatly appreciated!

Maybe it’s not the one or the other, but both - maybe both mechanisms are interrelated: Cycles lead civilisations through more or less similar stages, mostly ending in corruption; at the same time, at some stage in the cycle, the cleansing mechanism kicks in and the process starts anew.

But then the question arises, “what is the point of all that”? Maybe the point is that civilisations go through the cycles, but individuals get the opportunity for ‘ascension’, until the grand cycle (309K years) comes to the end, where ascension might be partly a mass phenomenon, where some part ‘graduates to 4D’, while the other part re-enters the 3D cycle once again.

Q: (L) What do you mean that the human race is currently being formed on that planet? Is that because that planet is this planet?

A: No. That closes realm grand cycle.

Q: (L) Are you saying that there are human beings being created on that planet at this current time...

A: Yes, you are. Your race is forming there.

Q: (L) How?

A: Realm crossing understand?

Q: (L) Are you saying that there are 4th density bodies being formed there...

A: No. 3rd.

Q: (L) There are 3rd density bodies... are we going to leave the bodies we are in and go into other bodies?

A: You are drifting... Think carefully. Realm is derivative of reality. Cycle.

Q: (L) So the human race is being formed on this other planet at the present time...

A: Yes.

Q: (L) And at the time of the realm border crossing, this other planet will then become cindered... burned up...

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Where will the human beings go that are being formed on that planet at the time of the realm border crossing?

A: Ancient earth.

Q: (L) They will go to ancient earth?

A: There is no time as you know it; its all just lessons for the collective consciousness.

Q: (L) So at the closing of this grand cycle everything will just start all over again?

A: Not exactly; you see, there is no start.

Q: (L) Are a lot of souls on the earth going to recycle into these new bodies coming onto the earth?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) As ancient mankind?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) And do the whole thing all over again?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) So, in other words, a lot of people are going back to square one?

A: Close.

Q: (L) Is this punishment.

A: No. Nature.

Q: (L) Are some of the souls, at that point, going to move into a higher density level?

A: Yes.

Just speculating.

 

[palestine]

Hello @nicklebleu,

That's a really old session! The Cs who introduced themselves to Laura back then were truly unique; they sometimes said very harsh things about how humans are exploited, and also a wide variety of other things—the forum's search process wasn't as developed as it would later be, and the data was sporadic and disjointed. I like that feeling. It goes from the Loch Ness Monster to extremely serious and blunt topics.

I think I've found the answer to my question in the article on Venus transits (well, I needed to read more):

The Seven Destructive Earth Passes of Comet Venus

Cometary events can be ongoing or a thing of past. Likewise they can be periodic, pseudo-periodic or a one-shot event.

For example, we know of ongoing periodic cometary cycles like the 27.9 million year cycle followed by Nemesis and its accompanying cometary swarm (see chapter 13 to 19 of Earth Changes and The Human-Cosmic Connection) or the ongoing 3,600 year cometary cycle described in my article 'Volcanoes, Earthquakes And The 3,600 Year Comet Cycle'.

There are also ongoing pseudo-periodic cycles like Comet Halley, whose average period is 77 years, but whose single periods span from 74.33 years to 79 years.

There are one-shot events like the 12,900 BP cometary event described in my article 'Of Flash Frozen Mammoths and Cosmic Catastrophes'.

And finally there are past pseudo-periodic comets like cometary Venus from 5,200 BP to 4,600 BP with decreasing orbital period: from 160 years for pass 1 to 60 years for pass 7.

Three frameworks for destructive comets:

• periodic cometary cycles (27.9 million year, 3600 year cycle) - fix, stable, recurring and ever happening
• pseudo-periodic - ?
• one-shot-events

I was trying to make A. Lobaczewski's pathocracy model (pathocracy = corruption) fit into the anthropocosmic equation (corruption = comet) and "figure things out". The above qualificatives help.

I suppose that because "corruption attracts comets", we may bind it to a "one-shot-event" concept, potentially ever present.

In addition, it may be that, if we are in a "pseudo-periodic" or in a "periodic" cycle - and that a high level of corruption takes place - that it could act as a magnet for the respective comet... Unless it would attract an additional one?

The reasons why all of this happen, is as you stated it. I suppose that it's part of the basic machine of the Universe. It likes to be well-oiled, and the growth through densities is part of it, like a whole not understandable by my 3D brain.

 

[axj]

This seems to be a more appropriate thread to continue the chronology discussion:

I had the inkling that if you were right about phantom years, it would be because of the session date (correct me if I am wrong!): the session took place in 1994, so that phantom years would act at this level. (That's because the C's provided plain dates - 10662, 10900, so the phatom years would only be possibly acting on the session's date).

We don't know if and how the C's adjusted the dates for the phantom years. One possibility is like you said that our current year is treated as being 400-500 years earlier (now being 16th or 17th century instead of 21st).

The other way to adjust the calendar dates is to keep the current year 2025 and adjust everything before the first millenium AD by 400-500 years. In that case all BC dates could be off by 400-500 years.

Thank you. This left me confused, because if the flood took place in 10662, the crystal event ("after the flood") have been dated 10900. Well, you see the idea!

In the session, it's said "approximately", "from 50K to 10900". I am left thinking that the 10900 would be approximate. Unless you have another idea?

Yes, these dates contradict what the C's said about Atlantis recovering somewhat from the comet impacts and then being destroyed by the crystals. It seems more likely that one of the given dates is off, rather than the sequence of events.

I was hoping that we could be able to build a more exact sequence for the Younger Dryas.

What we have is already quite exact, I think. Except that we do not have the exact dates for each of the three parts of the cataclysm, only that these began around 10900 or 10700 and that Atlantis was probably gone within a few hundred years of that or less (except for the Atlanteans who apparently became undergrounders).

 

[palestine]

This seems to be a more appropriate thread to continue the chronology discussion:


We don't know if and how the C's adjusted the dates for the phantom years. One possibility is like you said that our current year is treated as being 400-500 years earlier (now being 16th or 17th century instead of 21st).

The other way to adjust the calendar dates is to keep the current year 2025 and adjust everything before the first millenium AD by 400-500 years. In that case all BC dates could be off by 400-500 years.


Yes, these dates contradict what the C's said about Atlantis recovering somewhat from the comet impacts and then being destroyed by the crystals. It seems more likely that one of the given dates is off, rather than the sequence of events.


What we have is already quite exact, I think. Except that we do not have the exact dates for each of the three parts of the cataclysm, only that these began around 10900 or 10700 and that Atlantis was probably gone within a few hundred years of that or less (except for the Atlanteans who apparently became undergrounders).

Hello, thank you.

If I refer to those two bits:

Q: (L) How many years ago did the flood of Noah occur?

A: 12656. (10,662 B.C.)

Q: (L) And Noah's flood occurred 12,388 B.C., is that correct?

A: Close.

"Close" means a 1726 year discrepancy.

If I refer to this bit:

Q: (seek10) What was the time period when the crystals overpowered Atlanteans?

A: 50k to 10900 BC approximately.

Well - you see the idea: "approximately", referring to the 10900 date.

I will keep on studying as I can, and I hope that whatever that would need to be discovered - will be discovered! Thank you all for your work and studies! Encouragements for all

 

[katarinak]

We don't know if and how the C's adjusted the dates for the phantom years. One possibility is like you said that our current year is treated as being 400-500 years earlier (now being 16th or 17th century instead of 21st).

I suddenly remembered a conversation from roughly 20 years ago In the context of these ‘phantom years’, he mentioned that the period between 600 and 700 AD is considered one of those ‘made-up’ eras in our history. That’s the time when Samo’s Empire supposedly existed in the territory of present-day Slovakia, but there are absolutely no surviving contemporary written records about it. Everything we know about this period comes exclusively from later, non-local (foreign) sources.

 

[Kadam303]

for some reason only now i seen this post ..thankyou :

better late then never.

 

[katarinak]

I remember one more thing to theese phantom years. it was about missing informations about some periods in our history due to the Slovakia is small and was not important country. Therefore there was not effort to fullfill time periods in such not important places. I dont know if this was the key how he found thees phantom years or it was the same parameter in phantom years.

I am not specialist in history but maybe it could be way how to discover which period was added

have a nice day

 

[palestine]

In the context of these ‘phantom years’, he mentioned that the period between 600 and 700 AD is considered one of those ‘made-up’ eras in our history.

It's not easy to figure out where the years have been inserted! From what you say, and from what this thread provides, it matches (after 564 AD):

Do you remember, by chance, how many years were added? I understand it's 100 years.

 

[katarinak]

Do you remember, by chance, how many years were added? I understand it's 100 years.

I remember exactly information that Samo empire didnt exist. Samo empire was in 623 – 658 ad. Samo empire was first attempt of Slavs to create their own state

 

[palestine]

I remember exactly information that Samo empire didnt exist. Samo empire was in 623 – 658 ad. Samo empire was first attempt of Slavs to create their own state

Thank you!