Cervical cancer-Mich. schoolgirls may need HPV shots

  • Thread starter Thread starter katatonically
  • Start date Start date
Lynne said:
So there it is, I think that we are being given vaccinations, and maybe in the future even forced, to take a vaccination for something; there are sure enough out there. And if that doesn’t cut it there are the fluorescent lights, which also contain mercury, the kind that has the bad vapors. The quote from the C’s confirming that the vaccinations can change our attunement, and then the curious discussion about containers that is in the thread about Damanhur. So could it all link up to 4D STS trying to get us all wrapped up and ready for their domination? I think there is definitely something going on. And this just might be part of it.

Okay, now the niggling in the back of my mind has stopped. So I will too? ;)
Just to add sometihng about fluorescent lights and "global warming fever" :

http://www.signs-of-the-times.org/articles/show/129569-Mercury+in+energy-saving+bulbs+worries+scientists

Mercury is poisonous, but it's also a necessary part of most compact fluorescent bulbs, the kind that environmentalists and some governments are pushing as a way to cut energy use.

With an estimated 150 million CFLs sold in the United States in 2006 and with Wal-Mart alone hoping to sell 100 million this year, some scientists and environmentalists are worried that most are ending up in garbage dumps.
U.S. regulators, manufacturers and environmentalists note that, because CFLs require less electricity than traditional incandescent bulbs, they reduce overall mercury in the atmosphere by cutting emissions from coal-fired power plants.

But some of the mercury emitted from landfills is in the form of vaporous methyl-mercury, which can get into the food chain more readily than inorganic elemental mercury released directly from a broken bulb or even coal-fired power plants, according to government scientist Steve Lindberg.
 
And the number vaccinations people are supposed to get continues to skyrocket! Meanwhile the actual health of the population continues to decline. It is already clear that the drug companies are not interested in helping people or even giving correct information. Vaccinations are just another way that immune systems are being destroyed, right next to fluoridating our drinks, and junkifying our food. Allergies, asthma, and other autoimmune disease used to be rare or unknown, now it is the norm. If the medical industry actually cared about people's health, it would be researching and developing ways for people to maximize their own natural defenses, instead of breeding generations of people increasingly dependant on vaccinations and prescriptions.

You can't vaccinate against cancer. Vaccinating against cancer would be like vaccinating against hunger. The only way to truly prevent cancer is to live a healthy lifestyle. We hear that this vaccine prevents cancer so many times that people are taking it too literally. They admit, it would not prevent 100% of cervical cancer. Most people who do contract HPV do not get cancer from it anyway. Doesn't that give us a little hint that perhaps there are much more important factors besides the virus that causes the cancer? We can't let the medical industry box in our thought like this. This isn't even a matter of "oh, we don't know what else could cause it so vaccinating against the virus is the best we can do". No! The drug companies, the medical industry, with all of their resources, could find much better, cheaper treatments if they wanted to, but they don't want to. HPV clears up on its own, sometimes it does, sometimes it doesn't. Whether it does or does not is not magic or random, it happens for a reason. Why aren't drug companies studying what factors lead to HPV clearing up by itself? Because they don't want that kind of cure! No money in that! The worst part is most people are so brainwashed they don't even ask these kinds of questions, they let the psychopaths frame the debate in terms of what they are doing, never a thought to what they COULD be doing. The average person is so naively trusting they think that if there was a better thing drug companies could be studying, they would be doing it, right? WRONG!

Every single day you can open the newspaper and read junk like aspirin fights heart disease, as if human beings are characters in a role-playing game where holy water beats curse-status and antidote-potion beats poison-status and aspirin beats heart-disease-status, rock beats scissors. Meanwhile, in reality, the human body is a complex interconnected, self-healing system. The healthy body will fight cancer all by itself. When that happens They call it "spontaneous remission", as if that was some kind of chaotic, fundamentally unpredictable, quantum event, when in reality that was just a healthy person's body doing what it was designed to do!

Perhaps the vaccine would reduce the incidence of cervical cancer, but that does not mean it is good. A hystorectomy would be more effective, but obviously that would not be good. People receiving the vaccine have gotten terrible side effects, even paralysis. This is clearly indicative of nerve damage, and just because the paralysis reaction is rare does not mean that no one else is getting nerve damage from the vaccine.

I don't know if the vaccine will be recommended for someone like me, but in any case, I know I would just say NO. Debating about how effective it is or whatever is a waste of time when the other side of the debate has absolutely no interest in debating fairly. We are dealing with psychopaths here. Their agenda of greed and power-mongering is their first, last, and middle concern on the matter. Worst of all the only ones with the resources to inform us on the matter, to thoroughly study the iise, are the very ones with the agenda to push it on us. The fact that they are pushing so hard for a vaccine for a disease that is rare and treatable is proof that there is a hidden agenda here, one that we should want no part of.
 
Back
Top Bottom