Ruth
The Living Force
This is an 'expose' on Erika Kirk. (Video about 20 minutes)
Regardless of how hyped it is, or how strange some of the questions are, it shows incosistencies in her back story as well as how 'staged managed' her whole life is - and potentially was - in the past!
The mismatch is between reality and the way she is being 'presented' to the world - presumably in order for her to take up a role. They are attempting to present her as conservative, catholic, virutous, wife, mother, who has no 'past'. This is not necessarily true or accurate.
I disagree with the claim that Erika's "silence was deafening" (8.48 min). I think the more they SPEAK (as well as the more SHE speaks), the worse they look and the more inconsitencies are revealed. Their behaviour essentially discredits her from her current "role" as TPUSA CEO as well as any future "role" she may have liked with JD Vance in the White House.
I think she is a puppet and is expected to play a part for both Zionists and the Conservative Movements. Her whole life was probably in service to this, with or without her knowledge or awareness. People assume that a person is responsible for everything they do and say as well as all their successes. No, I think this type of person (a free thinker) does not make a good 'puppet' and someone like that is someone the elites end up wanting to control.
Essentially she is placed with people who are like that (such as Charlie Kirk, and maybe even JD Vance?) as an effort to control or 'influence' them. I don't think the American People know the difference between a free thinker and a manipulated, performative puppet. Maybe it's what they need to think about?
Regardless of how hyped it is, or how strange some of the questions are, it shows incosistencies in her back story as well as how 'staged managed' her whole life is - and potentially was - in the past!
The mismatch is between reality and the way she is being 'presented' to the world - presumably in order for her to take up a role. They are attempting to present her as conservative, catholic, virutous, wife, mother, who has no 'past'. This is not necessarily true or accurate.
I disagree with the claim that Erika's "silence was deafening" (8.48 min). I think the more they SPEAK (as well as the more SHE speaks), the worse they look and the more inconsitencies are revealed. Their behaviour essentially discredits her from her current "role" as TPUSA CEO as well as any future "role" she may have liked with JD Vance in the White House.
I think she is a puppet and is expected to play a part for both Zionists and the Conservative Movements. Her whole life was probably in service to this, with or without her knowledge or awareness. People assume that a person is responsible for everything they do and say as well as all their successes. No, I think this type of person (a free thinker) does not make a good 'puppet' and someone like that is someone the elites end up wanting to control.
Essentially she is placed with people who are like that (such as Charlie Kirk, and maybe even JD Vance?) as an effort to control or 'influence' them. I don't think the American People know the difference between a free thinker and a manipulated, performative puppet. Maybe it's what they need to think about?