Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history

JEEP said:
Well, not really. Just went with the X vid and the claim there was slight recoil. But, they made the point that if the neck wound was an entry wound, it had to be from a small caliber round. A rifle shot would have caused massive damage that wasn't what was seen.


OK - skimmed through and saw most of it. The gist was a shot from the right that went in from back of the head, out through the neck, and the bullet was even captured going down past Charlie's black pants. It was previously thought it was a bullet going up from the trap door. If this is the case, then that explains the removal of the camera - and that guy misled/lied to Candace, showed her altered footage - and the removal of the ground and paving over it.

Now here's another video that absolutely says it was a shot from the right to the back of the head/exit out the neck and even a possible capture of the perp hidden by a bush (or wearing green clothing):

[see upper left]
View attachment 112171
[bigger size]
View attachment 112174

[zoomed view]
View attachment 112172

[greenery/skin tones/hat & hair/weapon?]
View attachment 112173

Here's the vid that had these captures:


ADDED - The bullet heading to the ground from the Ian Carroll vid:
View attachment 112176

Seems like the most plausible explanation and a whole lot of lying going on.
Click to expand...
Already ruled out. Someone posted high-resolution footage that showed the 'camouflaged shooter on the balcony'. It's a planted shrub.
 
Ryan said:
One of the comments:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1967646094185337230
That girl in the red MAGA hat immediately looks at him before turning to the front and seeing what happened to Charlie. The guy is also pretty much directly opposite the two guys (part of Kirk's security, I think) who were making 'hand signals' at the side of the stage.

A shot by a smaller caliber bullet, making an entry wound at the front of the neck, severing/lodging in the spinal column with no exit wound and causing instant decorticate posturing, fits with the observed video footage.

One wonders how much connection Kirk's security detail has to Israel?
Click to expand...
Already ruled out. He's not holding a gun, and he's adjusting his roll-up sleeve.
 
Cosmos said:
I would like to bring up a couple of things that are going through my mind.

First: In the last radio show @Joe brought up the fact that it is quite likely hard to know for any of us what the true percentage distributions are in the general population of people believing, thinking, knowing or doing this or that thing about any given topic. Joe then brought up some examples of how different people can react towards a situation like the assassination of Kirk: One large part likely doesn’t even know who Kirk is even after what has happened. Another large part heard something about the guy but they don’t know much more than “Isn’t that the guy that was shot?“. Then there is a large portion of people who know who Kirk is and that he was shot and they just follow the official narrative. And so on.

The point being that the portion of the population that is really questioning AND digging into what happened is likely pretty small if not very small compared to the rest of the population.
Click to expand...
Sure, but the 'uninterested majority', assuming there is one, doesn't ultimately factor into what happens. Before RFK Jr became US Health secretary, what percentage of Americans would you have guessed thinks, or suspects, vaccines cause autism? Well, it now looks like US government policy on the childhood vaccine schedule is about to bend to what was, for decades, 'fringe conspiracy theory'.
Cosmos said:
Fourth: I only watched about half of the following video by Jim Breuer. If possible you could listen to those couple of minutes too, to get where my thinking is:

Click to expand...

That was a hilarious and true accounting of what we've all just been subjected to! And great, general, advice: "don't feed the beast!"
Cosmos said:
At the memorial of Kirk the culmination of everything seemed to be when Erika Kirk said that she forgives the assassin. Now, given that the assassin was likely not just a patsy BUT handled/ordered to do what he did by Mossad/CIA, wouldn’t then forgiveness toward what the killer/-s did sort of imply ACCEPTANCE? See what the the C‘s said above. Erika seemed to proclaim that acceptance as the highlight/culmination of the whole ceremony and maybe the whole event was centered around that idea/proclamation? Now, was Erika sending out a signal of acceptance towards what has happened? And somebody or something is hoping that this will lead to many ordinary people doing the same? If so, what is the percentage in the general public that has adopted Erikas statement of acceptance there, in addition to the many people who are ignorant about the whole thing? So maybe the percentage of people that are in one way or the other accepting what happened might be quite high, especially after what Erika said?
Click to expand...
Maybe, maybe. But did you hear what Trump said about that during his speech? He pretty much said the opposite! And it's a safe bet that many more Americans would take his advice over Erika Kirk's.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1970241183986467245
 
Last edited:
Niall said:
People are digging into Erika Kirk. Some interesting things coming up:
Click to expand...

Here's another one:

The girl seems to be everywhere. Just from a quick look, she's also into Real Estate, it seems:
www.zillow.com

Erika Frantzve - Real Estate Agent in New York, NY - Reviews | Zillow

Visit Erika Frantzve's profile on Zillow to find ratings and reviews. Find great New York, NY real estate professionals on Zillow like Erika Frantzve of Corcoran Group
www.zillow.com www.zillow.com
The founder of that agency is married to a former FBI agent.

Nothing much, but what people are digging up about her really seems to be in contrast with the "submissive, stay-at-home-mom" image she used to portray in Charlie's show, saying she didn't handle any finances, etc.
 
Keep in mind as you learn about her background that her 'seeming to be everywhere' is substantially explained by her being 5 years older than her husband.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom