OK! Now match that bullet to the Mauser, the Mauser to Tyler's DNA and, voila! You got your lone gunman - case closed!
Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history
- Thread starter Beau
- Start date
OK! Now match that bullet to the Mauser, the Mauser to Tyler's DNA and, voila! You got your lone gunman - case closed!
Ricardo
The Living Force
XD Can we call this bullet a retard ?
And notice that the blood was dark, i.e. venous. This could be compatible with a laceration of the jugular vein, an explosive type of damage with laceration of soft tissues and the jugular vein. It's an effective way to kill a man.
It bothered me that they would say "a shot to his carotid artery". The carotid artery will bleed in a pulsatile form, and red. Definitely not dark. You can't reach it without hitting first the jugular vein, though.
On the left side of the neck (left side of the human body, not of the image), you don't even see the artery. On the right side, they removed the sternocleidomastoid muscle to show a bit of it.
Another image from a different angle. To show the carotid artery, they had to remove most muscles in the neck, and they also pulled the jugular vein with a hook to show the carotid artery. In both images, they already removed the platisma muscle, which basically covers the entire neck:
A gun shot could have done it, but I think it's reasonable to say that in that case, it could have been a "cleaner" wound with most of the blood not reaching the light of day, but pouring down the neck into the thorax.
I think the shotgun is the main problem, and the distance (15 feet or so). There are probably a few hundred pellets there, and it's fired directly at the ribbon. Officially, Kirk was hit cleanly in the neck a couple of inches above his shirt line with a single bullet. The bullet did not touch the chain or his shirt.
When I watch the video of the assassination, with the T-shirt moving up, and his movement it is as if something happens on the platform itself, from underneath. If a little gadget with something equivalent to a gun was placed below and shot upward could it not kill? Nobody would need to sit there, it could be a robot and remotely activated.
With regard to a difficult to understand assassination technique, there was a discussion that included "advanced assassination tech." It is probably even more developed today than it was 8 years ago. Here is the excerpt and the context:
Session 9 December 2017
Notice that the USA is exhibiting all the symptoms of a "Color Revolution"
Much has changed since then, but is the danger gone?
Session 14 March 2015
With regard to a difficult to understand assassination technique, there was a discussion that included "advanced assassination tech." It is probably even more developed today than it was 8 years ago. Here is the excerpt and the context:
Session 9 December 2017
It was Clinton then, are there some such groups also today? For more context here is the continuation:
More than ten years ago:
Notice that the USA is exhibiting all the symptoms of a "Color Revolution"
Much has changed since then, but is the danger gone?
Session 14 March 2015
Regarding the above Cosmic influences, there were four new entries to the CNEOS fireball list around the time CK was killed. Would that be a Cosmic comment?
Since the issue is that it doesn't seem like a 30-06 round was used, it seems these are the possible explanations that are most likely.
That's right! I didn't think of that.
Makes the mic angle even less likely to me.
It was two wooden stake slugs, not regular shotgun ammo, and the slugs hit above the necklace on the top of the breastbone.
I agree it's a far from perfect comparison, but it does show that something not hit directly could be tossed and thrown in an unexpected way.
Based on what I've seen, it's possible that a .30-06 fired by Robinson could have caused the shirt ballooning up both front and back, but it would mean that those areas of his body i.e skin, caused the ballooning, maybe as a result of the energy of the bullet transferring to his chest cavity area because the bullet deviated shortly after entering his neck, downwards, and stayed there. Possible explanation for left side of his tee shooting up towards his left ear is the cross being propelled in that direction by the ballooning of his skin and catching on his shirt and pulling it in that direction.
Yes, I agree that his conclusions are off.
I thought it was interesting mostly because of the analysis of the videos and the possible drones. But also, because he mentioned the drones sending signals. Sure, they didn't trigger the guns, but they could have triggered the mic device he was wearing, perhaps. Or just be sending other types of signals for other purposes.
Edit: added bit for clarity.
Large wooden stakes hitting a wide area directly in the middle of the ribbon necklace, dispersing the gel "skin" and throwing the necklace sideways.
Kirk's necklace and shirt weren't even hit indirectly. The shotgun example seems closer to an explosion outside his chest area than a bullet directly entering his neck.
Yep. Unfortunately everyone on YouTube films their ballistic gel dummy tests without clothing for greater visual effect - that, or testing bulletproof vests. In this case the first shot of the three was a wooden stake, no pellets, and hit above the medal, but you can see a small amount of damage to the ribbon caused during impact. I still think a large amount of the energy pushing back the opposite direction, maybe even most of it, is coming simply from the shockwave transferring through the body from impact and the internal cavity, though. If I find any other examples, I'll post them.
Trending content
-
-
Thread 'Coronavirus Pandemic: Apocalypse Now! Or exaggerated scare story?'
- wanderingthomas
Replies: 30K -
