Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history
- Thread starter Beau
- Start date
Yep, same here. Wasn’t following Kirk closely at all and feel similar. And especially after I heard what others close to him had to say, who I would consider decent and trustworthy.
I guess this week had been a shock and awe one.
I was listening to local radio ( while going to work before kirk's assassination ), the news of Ukrainian woman murder in the Charlotte subway is a dominating topic. The unexpected public killing of unsuspecting victim, public apathy in helping her, mainstream media hiding it for weeks made every body angry and there were demands for LIVE hanging the killer and even prosecuting the judges who let the killer go out of arrest 14 times (I think). Every body associated or identified with the event, as most use public services like public trains etc.
Kirk's assassination came next. In a way, he was at the 'center' of many raising people, deep state don't like. He seems to be like a bridge between president Trump to students/ conservative base, main-stream media challengers (Tucker, Candace and other anti-leftist sources) - sort of old vs new 'hope'. Message is resounding one.
What is interesting in both cases is, the killer's family themselves reported to the police. In the case of Charlotte subway killer, her mother reported to police for beating her daughter and in the Kirk's case, killer's father notified police.
Well, we have reports of drones seen during the killing is interesting like in assassination attempt on Trump. Probably this whole life cycle of Manchurian candidate phenomenon ( from grooming to final act) became more matured and we see less and less deep state actors in the screens.
I was listening to local radio ( while going to work before kirk's assassination ), the news of Ukrainian woman murder in the Charlotte subway is a dominating topic. The unexpected public killing of unsuspecting victim, public apathy in helping her, mainstream media hiding it for weeks made every body angry and there were demands for LIVE hanging the killer and even prosecuting the judges who let the killer go out of arrest 14 times (I think). Every body associated or identified with the event, as most use public services like public trains etc.
Kirk's assassination came next. In a way, he was at the 'center' of many raising people, deep state don't like. He seems to be like a bridge between president Trump to students/ conservative base, main-stream media challengers (Tucker, Candace and other anti-leftist sources) - sort of old vs new 'hope'. Message is resounding one.
What is interesting in both cases is, the killer's family themselves reported to the police. In the case of Charlotte subway killer, her mother reported to police for beating her daughter and in the Kirk's case, killer's father notified police.
Well, we have reports of drones seen during the killing is interesting like in assassination attempt on Trump. Probably this whole life cycle of Manchurian candidate phenomenon ( from grooming to final act) became more matured and we see less and less deep state actors in the screens.
Or what if they are so power thirsty that they quite literally want greater Israel to actually be not only in the region but globally? I think I heard that idea recently somewhere and it got me thinking. The argument was made there that nobody really knows what “greater Israel“ really means and where that is supposed to stop and what would make anyone so certain that they would stop at the many nations near them in the region? A good question.
Yeah, we know they are already more or less “in control“ of many if not all countries in one way or the other, but what if they are actually that power thirsty that they would like to see themselves quite literally and openly on top of “those subhumans“ as some sort of master race/class/aristocracy?
Yesterday Donald Trump Jr. told Megyn Kelly that, besides Donald Trump himself, Charlie Kirk was most responsible for Trump getting elected in 2024 (and 2020). Between that, his criticism of Israel, and urging Trump not to go to war with Iran, it's easy to see why he would be a target of the PTB.
I mean even if HAARP and/or greenbaum type stuff is involved, they still have to have the right cooperative brainwashed "death cult psycho", I'd think, and they put the finishing touches. I doubt they're taking intelligent people with strong will and a moral character and converting them into killers. Are we really supposed to just try to reason with them and explain to them why killing people is bad and laughing and celebrating their death is bad and they ought to be ashamed and reflect on their choices?
On the one hand, it seems like division can play into the hands of the PTB. Have them fight each other and distract them from the top of the pyramid so to speak. On the other hand, as someone else mentioned, shouldn't we be divided? Good vs evil? Truth vs lies? I get the idea that people want everyone to unite against the psychopaths at the top and ultimately to cut off 4D STS from their feeding tube. The C's said "against all when the time comes" when talking about the Nephilim invasion for example. But I believe they also mentioned that the specific "all" will be in 4D if I am not mistaken. And there's just no way these authoritarians are going to 4D any time soon. And how exactly do you expect to unite with those purple-haired crazies against any kind of external threat? You really want them in your camp, or anywhere near you, when you're trying to do anything that requires cooperation and wisdom and a steady hand?
You know how great tragedies/calamities (like 9/11 or and alien invasion) tend to unite people, have them put away their differences because they're all much more terrified of that new thing than of each other? Well, that's all fine and good - but only when their differences are relatively minor and blown out of proportion. The differences between people today are NOT minor or blown out of proportion, they are so fundamental, that I don't care who or what I have to contend with, I can't imagine joining up with the people who are currently cheering Charlie's death.
So I'm not convinced that we should be trying to make peace, have conversations, and somehow find common ground with those that seem so hopelessly ponerized and hell bent on destroying all that is good, moral, and true. I'm not advocating violence, just systematic shunning them from society, from your circle of friends, and even moving physically away from them. Draw a literal line in the sand, surround yourself with collinear people, collinear communities, etc. And yes call them what they really are, don't mince words.
Let them live in their bubble cities with the lizzies as the C's mentioned would happen. And yeah I get the idea that authoritarians can be good or bad depending on the influence, but Charlie was that influence and his death was a message from 4D STS, basically saying "you will not convince/influence my flock". Fine - screw you and screw your flock. I don't think this flock can be saved or reprogrammed. It seems more like an organ fully taken over by cancer that just needs to be removed at this point rather than treated. And in this case I'm talking separation, not violence. The organ will die all on its own if it isn't supported by the rest of the body anyway, cancer is entropic.
And how are we supposed to "influence" this ponerized flock anyway, realistically speaking? Charlie is dead. We got what.. Candace, Tucker? And how long before Candace and Tucker suffer the same fate? Are we just going to sit around praying for a new Charlie/Candace/Tucker to develop over a course of many years (which is what it takes), assuming anyone would even bother at that point? It takes a very special person with charisma, intelligence, will power, work ethic, and heart - and many years of growing your platform, only to be ended in a second with no effort. That doesn't feel fair - it feels like cheating, the playing field isn't level, STS are not being forced to put the same kind of effort to counteract it, they just pull a trigger and move on.
Sorry this turned out more like a rant, but I'm just feeling hopeless and angry, and kinda powerless at the moment. I want people to be pissed off, but I also realize that any violence will result in a police state. So the only thing I can think of is channeling that collective anger towards non-violent separation. The leftist don't actually produce anything in society or economy - we don't "need" them. We have the farms, the tradesmen, etc. They can keep their cities and their AI, and we will keep the backbone and lifeblood of civilization and family, and let's see how that works out for everybody.
Ricardo
The Living Force
Fwiw , yep , also don't forget that many of those "blue haired freaks" are merely the pretenders of the living, ie Ops.So those are always excluded from any progression either way. ( Note: the Nephilim are still 3rd graders so it's implied that they will be present after transition and to be reckoned with in some way ).
Session 2 November 1994 :
(...)
Q: (L) So the 36 million will be against all on the planet when the time comes?
A: Of course.
(...)
That's the consensus of the gun people I know.
I've seen a few people on X taking the "creating division" line, but they seem to be directing this to the conservatives, which is fine, I guess. But they should be directing it primarily to the "left". Because the people cheering on Kirk's death are the ones providing fuel to the fire, reinforcing the idea within their echo chamber that political violence is justified and acceptable. Acts of violence like this create a social contagion effect, like with suicides and mass shootings, and the more support and cheering they get, the more will feel comfortable following through on their fantasies. The problem is, talking down to them about how bad "creating division" is and will be is futile and will have the same effect as appealing to their conscience by showing them pictures of Kirk's family. They don't care.
Is this just an intuition, or has there been any evidence of "other shooters"?
Last edited:
And remember what the C's said - invasion happens when "the programming is complete". I can't imagine how much more complete it can possible be when you have conscripted integrated members of the population to do what took "the secret team" in the past.
I don't see it quite the same way. Periods of political instability characterized by assassination and terror attacks follow historical patterns. Read Peter Turchin's Ages of Discord, for example. The West is going through the tail end of a secular cycle when this type of thing is to be expected, so while it may be out of the ordinary in terms of the past 60 years or so, it isn't when you go back just 150 years.
unkl brws
Dagobah Resident
A weird story about a man in Canada who was falsely accused of being Kirk's shooter.
www.ctvnews.ca
How this Canadian man was falsely identified as the Charlie Kirk shooter
A Canadian man woke up from his afternoon nap to the panic of his name and photo circulating online in connection with the shooting of U.S. conservative politician Charlie Kirk.
Lefty provocateur provoking the crowd at a Charlie Kirk vigil in Boise.
He almost always is. Though I cant think of a time he wasn't... its usually well after the fact that he is proven right, so if he isn't right at the moment, he could well be proven right in the future. His track record is that good.
we can't influence them too much like in "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink". We can't even do it to our own children and it is their soul's lesson( if exist).
session-12-july-2014
Candace mentioned that Kirk was under tremendous pressure from his donors during the last few months. Under those circumstances, either give into them or face the consequences are the only options. He chose the later (at least at soul level). That's as far as it can get in Matrix. The only choice is making martyr out of him is the only choice and it involves grieving. Let's hope Wave will do something.
Trending content
-
-
Thread 'Coronavirus Pandemic: Apocalypse Now! Or exaggerated scare story?'
- wanderingthomas
Replies: 30K -
