Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history

I watched a pretty good amount of Charlie Kirk. Years ago I thought he was a bit cocky and a bit of an idiot on Israel. But he grew on me as I saw how he engaged with students, many of them quite insufferable, with calm respect. When he talked about the importance of dialog, I think that is where he shined as just a good human being. I liked him, but I hadn’t classified myself as a big supporter. I did see him become less and less confident and assertive in his defense of Israel. He seemed to be changing and learning, and that’s always an inspiring thing to witness.

I was actually a bit surprised at how hard his assassination hit me. It has really affected me. Not just negatively, but I think even more so positively. It has me thinking of the spiritual significance and reality of martyrdom. Like with JFK, Bobby Kennedy, MLK, Princess Diana, John Lennon, and then jumping way back to Caesar… there is something of their spirit that is given to others from their life and in their death.
 
The object in the video of the event is roughly the size of the elbow-to-fingers of the woman below with her arm on the railing, which is around 1.5 to 2 feet for men. For women it’s shorter, around 1 to 1.5 feet. The object is not flying directly over their heads, so it it is closer to the camera and will be smaller. If we use that distance as the maximum, the object probably isn't more than around 30 cm long. For its minimum size: 8 mm, the size of an average housefly or a smallish horsefly (which range from 0.5 to 2.5 cm). In the first frame (0.0333 seconds), the object moves about 36 times its length. This gives possible speeds, roughly, of:

Length: Speed
30 cm: 705 mph
2.5 cm: 59 mph
8 mm: 19 mph (or 8.4 m/s)
utah0.png
In the other frames, it only travels around 21 to 22 times its length for a total of 104 lengths (in the 0.1332 seconds between first and fifth frame). Assuming a straight line parallel to the camera, that gives average speeds of:

Length: Speed
30 cm: 524 mph
2.5 cm: 44 mph
8 mm: 14 mph (or 6.25 m/s)

Horseflies can fly up to 90 mph or 40 m/s. (Incidentally, the fly in the video Mick West used for reference moves 33 body lengths in one frame, faster than 3 out of 4 of these frames.)


If you watch the full video of the Utah event above, you can find plenty of other "mystery drones": e.g. at 0:37, 2:19, 2:20, 4:43, 6:23, 10:42, 11:29, 12:28, 14:02, 14:58, 15:45, 16:14, 17:19, 17:48, 19:05, (gunshot is at 19:09,) 19:40, 19:52 is the totally-not-a-bug "drone", which shows up again for a single frame at 20:00, 1.5x bigger (bottom right image in collage below). The place was positively swarming with "drones". And that was just the obvious ones in the first 22 minutes. I’m sure if you focused on areas below the skyline there would be more.

Except for the wispy fluff at one of the times above, it's obvious when you watch that these are all bugs. Here’s a collage of some of them:
utah3.png
Here are some horseflies next to the Utah drone for comparison. I couldn't find a picture of a horsefly flying at the exact angle of the video, but you can use your imagination. Just rotate the horseflies in your mind:
utah1.png

As for the Butler “drone”, it travels about 19 times its length in 0.0333 seconds.

Length: Speed
30 cm: 383 mph (just multiply this by however feet long you want it to be to get your speed estimate)
2.5 cm: 32 mph
8 mm: 10 mph (or 4.6 m/s)

Here are the two frames from the Butler video. The middle image is a duplicate of the one on the left with highlights turned down to bring out the darkened bits on the top and bottom. At least the top shadow looks like a bug wing to me, as does the wing in the right frame:
butler.png
There are even more bugs in the realDJStew Butler video, e.g. at 3:21 for two frames, 3:23 for one frame, 4:51 for two frames, 6:00 for eight frames, 6:09 for eight frames, 7:07 for two frames. I remember when I watched the bodycam videos closely that at least one of the ones from on top the roof has a couple big bugs flying by (in front of the taller building, so there's no mistaking them).

Some flying bugs from videos of swarming horseflies and bees:
flies.png
 
Gotta say it: the credulity on display is impressive. Everyone believes in the reality of this story as told by the media.

Here is an interesting clip of Erika Kirk speaking yesterday for the first time, a mere 2 days after Kirk's apparent murder. She gives a "Go Ducks" shout out. (Oregon Ducks college football... 2 of my kids went there, so, I get the reference)

Remember all those body language analyses in the past of liars smiling and grinning? Who could possibly say something as ridiculous as "Go Ducks" with a smile, if they had just lost the most significant person in their life? (aside from Jesus, of course) Is she acting?

The grieving process takes time. Uncontrollable sobs and breakdowns are normal. Little stifled sniffles, not as much. So, Just watch this with an open mind. She is dressed to the nines and beautifully made up for her big moment on camera. Does she seem distraught commensurate with the supposed circumstances? Is she a person of astounding composure, and unshakable faith... or an actress reading scripted remarks?


Look at the chaotic, divisive results in the aftermath of this. Look at the extreme emotion generated (both here and on the internet) and the wildly destabilizing accusations flying around. Does this align with anything? (and on the eve of 9/11 no less)

Bottom line, I think it is important to let this play out for a while before assuming or believing in anything about it, and before getting sucked up into a vortex of emotional reaction.
 
A few interesting tweets and updates. Andy Ngo on Robinson's boyfriend Lance/Luna:


This account says there are now 6 transgender accounts that seemed to imply foreknowledge of the assassination:


Neighbor claims "shady visitors" at Robinson and Twiggs's apartment, and FBI has not ruled out co-conspirators:

 
Pretty sure there was a session reference to Crooks here.

Going back to that Butler thread, it took a while for evidence to become more - as it came in; testimonials, photos and video evidence (a bug may indeed become a drone as video rolls in) et cetera, and even at that, it can be hard slugging to see the unseen. The evidence can be good, circumstantial, subjective, or outright tainted. In all that, the guys did a good job coming up with Crooks scenarios, with confirmations later by the C's in the below session on a number of points. The session - covering the event at Butler, had different circumstances than what we find here with Kirk (a president for one and teams of security), and yet there are similarities (worth reading the session again, because the shooting MO's have commonality, and operators tend to do what was done before).

This brings up paid for operators/mercenaries and insiders. The one thing that this world has produced are many more professional guns for hire, and those that do the hiring would either be at arms-length, or be select insiders (intel/military). Of both, some may not even know that they are playing a part, with their roles to monitor or distract, or unconsciously take direction that causes distraction - many possibilities. Then there is the backroom tech, those who fiddle with data, like facebook and other social media to present a picture of the suspect - peeps know the score there. The news as usual.

If there was a small team on the ground, the shooter would need managing (whether he did shoot and kill Kirk or not), and cleaning up or planting evidence. The shooter was also left alive, so that is something to consider. Why? A drone to sight the scene would not be unusual, so perhaps more video will show somethin further in the future. The crowd themselves may upload interesting footage of people doing odd - out of place things.

Whatever gets determined in the end, it feels like a program alteration because things are not going to be the same. Already the focus has somewhat shifted to Israel, while Israel tries to make Kirk a shining David Star (my god, is Bibi a case) when Charlie eemed to be questioning things he had never questioned before. People will notice, have noticed.

Lastly, my thoughts go out to Charlie Kirks widow and children, in hopes that in time they can all find a way through this, this most painful of times. May God bless their family, and may Charlie transition well.

(L) All right, go for it.

(Joe) Did Crooks (the guy who allegedly shot at Trump) actually shoot at Trump? Was he the one shooting at Trump? Shooting a bullet at Trump…?

A: He shot, yes.

Q: (Joe) And he shot all of the eight bullets attributed to him.

A: Yes.

Q:
(L) Was his the bullet that hit Trump?

(Joe) Yeah. Did one of his bullets hit Trump's ear?

A: Yes.

Q:
(Joe) So, and was it just luck, let's say, that made Trump turn his head?

A: Divine intervention.

Q: (Joe) Divine intervention by Trump's higher self?

A: Yes. Powered by mass prayers.

Q: (Niall) Was Thomas Crooks groomed in any way?

A: Yes.

Q:
(Niall) So he was handled, okay.

(L) Was there another shooter on site?

A: Yes.

Q:
(Niall) Did this other shooter on site take out Crooks?

A: Yes.

Q: (Joe) And where did he fire from? Was he behind Crooks?

A:
Yes.

Q: (Joe) He was behind Crooks in the building, in one of the windows, one of the sniper people?

A:
Yes.

Q: (Niall) The last window maybe...

(Joe) There was at least one little UFO-type thing moving very fast. We don't know if there were one or two. There was definitely one, one that was caught clearly, maybe a number of seconds before Crooks fired the shots. It flew over the building or that general area, and it had a little kind of antenna on the back of it. You could freeze frame it to see it. And then there were other camera angles that saw another further away, with a more ball-like structure, though it could be the same one. But anyway, it was some kind of an anomalous, unidentified aerial vehicle in the air at the time of the shooting. What was... who owned that?

A: Drones.

Q: (Joe) And these are 3D drones run by Intel types?

A:
Yes.

Q:
(Joe) And was it really moving at the speed it seemed to have been? Was it moving at 2000 miles an hour or something like that?

(L) No, it wasn't, because it was probably closer than you imagine.

(Joe) Maybe, but it was moving extremely fast.

(Niall) Yes.

(Joe) Way faster than any drone you can buy, even the top end, the best of them. And what was this purpose? Was it there to just monitor? Did it have any purpose other than monitoring the situation?

A: Mind control signals.

Q:
(Joe) On Crooks?

A:
Yes.

Q: (Niall) Wow! Was the attempted assassination of Trump what the C's referred to…?

(Joe) They mentioned the program change...

(Niall) And the meeting with the Quorum.

(Joe) And they talked about program change upcoming. This was like in maybe February or March. They said it was in a timescale of months. Was that [Trump's assassination attempt] the anticipated program change, and it got subverted? Or is the program change still to come?

A: Program had to be changed to avoid mass violation of free will.

Q: (Joe) So the program was the planned assassination of Trump?

A: Yes.

Q: (Joe) And... but it was changed to avoid mass violation of free will. And who made the decision to change the program?

A: Quorum.

Q: (Joe) Right. So they had a good think about it, and thought it was a bad idea.

A: Violations of free will on that scale are similar to violations of gravity in your realm.
 
Back
Top Bottom