Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history

Here is the most convincing evidence I have seen that Kirk was actually shot from behind (from 4-5 o'clock)

I cannot find the original video, but Alex Jones just shared the analysis on his most recent live show. Watch from 3:15:00:
https://twitter.com/x/status/1967987383888134551

In this clip, you can see a white object approaching at the time of the gunshot, right before we see his t-shirt move and the lesion appaear on the neck.
1758057019151.png

https://twitter.com/x/status/1966256868696928606

The wound (in this case, looking like an exit wound) is at exactly the right angle.

The guy who published the original analysis shows evidence of a flash, at around the same time, from this same direction

1758058429484.png

Here would be the overall position of the shooter:

1758058608441.png
 
Last edited:
Keyhole said:
Here is the most convincing evidence I have seen that Kirk was actually short from behind (from 4-5 o'clock)

I cannot find the original video, but Alex Jones just shared the analysis on his most recent live show. Watch from 3:15:00:
https://twitter.com/x/status/1967987383888134551

In this clip, you can see a white object approaching at the time of the gunshot, right before we see his t-shirt move and the lesion appaear on the neck.
View attachment 111990

https://twitter.com/x/status/1966256868696928606

The wound (in this case, looking like an exit wound) is at exactly the right angle.

The guy who published the original analysis shows evidence of a flash, at around the same time, from this same direction

View attachment 111992

View attachment 111993
Click to expand...
Interesting. Makes sense that what we saw happen to the left side of Kirk's neck would be the 'exit wound', but that 'muzzle flash' contention needs more work. A 'stealthy pro' with access to the latest rifle tech could surely suppress, or even eliminate, muzzle flash? If that shot's coming from an open window, couldn't the 'muzzle flash' in fact be something that reflected off the window?

What's the latest on the bullet, by the way? The "30.06" one they said was used... did they report finding it?
 
Niall said:
She's now frontally challenging two heads of state, and one them terrifies all other world leaders.
Click to expand...

Should the whole world stay cowed by an obnoxious, bullying killer psychopath? When does it make sense to stand up and fight back - if not now, when? Candance's courage is fueled by her faith and the simple fact of truth over evil. Will her bravery bring about the same fate as Karla Turner, another extremely courageous woman who dared to speak out. Can she sit and stay quiet knowing this great evil exists in a world her dear children must live in? Maybe it's for her children she feels so strongly that she must speak truth to power! And really, is it not just her nature to not turn a blind eye to an evil so insidious, so threatening to good people of Christian faith in particular. Is she not following the path of Jesus as she believes it to be - the ultimate rebel? Can she not hear the cries for justice in a world increasingly devoid of such? Is Candance the new Joan of Arc - willing to take up the sword (figuratively speaking) against the mightiest Leviathan that may have ever existed?

Candance is fulfilling the most noble of convictions, giving the lie what it deserves - THE TRUTH!

Surely, we should all pray for her safety and success in this most righteous battle against the worst evil of our time!
 
Niall said:
What's the latest on the bullet, by the way? The "30.06" one they said was used... did they report finding it?
Click to expand...

Was there an autopsy? Would it not be clear that the neck wound was either an entry or exit wound? If entry, bullet fragments recovered? If exit, entry wound on the other side of his head? Seems like there ought to be something reported on this unless I missed it as I was out of touch last weekend.
 
Keyhole said:
Here is the most convincing evidence I have seen that Kirk was actually shot from behind (from 4-5 o'clock)

I cannot find the original video, but Alex Jones just shared the analysis on his most recent live show. Watch from 3:15:00:
https://twitter.com/x/status/1967987383888134551

In this clip, you can see a white object approaching at the time of the gunshot, right before we see his t-shirt move and the lesion appaear on the neck.
View attachment 111990
Click to expand...
I've seen this come up on Twitter a couple times. There's a question as to whether or not a bullet would show up on a camera phone. FWIW, I asked Grok:
  • A bullet moving at 400 [typical speed from a handgun]–1,000 [typical for highpowered rifle] m/s will likely appear in a 30 fps phone camera frame as a long, blurred streak spanning hundreds or thousands of pixels, not as a recognizable bullet.
  • The streak may be faint and hard to detect without high contrast or post-processing.
  • To capture a bullet clearly, a much faster shutter speed (e.g., 1/31,400 s for a handgun bullet) or a high-speed camera is needed, far beyond the capabilities of typical phone cameras at 30 fps. [The photojournalist who caught the Trump/Butler bullet was using a very fast shutter speed]
  • Using a slow-motion mode (e.g., 240 fps) would reduce the blur but still not freeze the bullet clearly.
 
Joe said:
Yes, that was my point and goal, without explicitly saying it, assuming, incorrectly perhaps, that anyone reading it would understand where I was going. And perhaps my other mistake was to frame it by first saying that what could lead to such a scenario was the perception that I described above: "the generalized belief that a "leftist" assassinated him and this marked a new escalation beyond the point of no return that needed to met with similar escalation by the 'right'."
Click to expand...

This makes sense. Thank you for clarifying.

Joe said:
They weren't blanket assertions and there was only one assertion: that the way the left was being depicted, especially in the aftermath of Kirk's assassination, was not accurate, primarily because of the generalized belief that a "leftist" assassinated him and this marked a new escalation beyond the point of no return that needed to met with similar escalation by the 'right'.
Click to expand...

Well now I think you're nitpicking about this being an assertion vs blanket assertions. If you'd laid out your logical process with a couple more sentences it would have been very clear what you meant. The "left as portrayed on social media" is a VERY broad spectrum running from news to anecdotes to videos - most of which is pretty bad and, at least for me, has been corroborated by personal experience.

It was easy for me to read "the left doesn't exist in a threatening way" as "ignore the evidence of your eyes and ears". "Threat" to a lot of people doesn't mean being just getting shot or blown up, but watching their children, families, friends, religion, society, politics, and even the fundamental truths of being human get degraded and corrupted year after year. I would say that's where a lot of the messy, "apoplectic" initial response to the cheering for Charlie Kirk's murder came in.

I now understand that you are making two arguments, one regarding the official narrative(s) of the left surrounding the identity of the shooter and one regarding how we should act (do not fall into confluence with the growing social contagion). I think I can agree with both even while introducing some nuance to the former. And that is that the Left as it stands today would have long since been cracked down on in any healthy society. Now the real motives and outcomes behind allowing it to become what it is are no doubt sinister, but at some point, people need to come back to reality. How that can happen in any positive way is well beyond me.

Joe said:
Perhaps this is a case of me not being sufficiently clear on an emotionally-charged topic combined with your own emotional reaction to this situation that required me to be more clear.
Click to expand...

I believe that is true. Thank you for clarifying your position.
 
Some videos to check out. Gray Hughes has reconstructed Robinson's path at the scene to the best of his ability using all the timestamps and surveillance footage released so far. Useful for getting an idea of the layout of the scene:
Gary at Paramount Tactical returns to the question of whether or not Charlie was wearing a plate under his shirt, because of the picture being shared showing his nipple poking through the shirt. He's not sure, but still thinks he was wearing a plate. He's in contact with someone close to Charlie who says he was wearing his vest more and more often recently and is pretty sure he was wearing it that day.
He debunks a few common things going around on Twitter, like the guy in white making "hand signals" (he was a close friend of Charlie's):
Haven't watched it, but Gray Hughes talked with Gary at Paramount for a few hours here.
And here's Candace's latest. She has spoken to friends of Robinson and Twiggs. She thinks Robinson was definitely involved, but based on what the acquaintances tell her, he could not have done this entirely on his own:
 
Last edited:
Cosmos said:
Important points to remember I think. Also, we might also need to take into consideration that there are probably different types of higher missions or soul groups people can belong to or are aligned with or are in process to align with. For example what might be true for our alignment might not necessarily be how other types of alignments are supposed to fulfill their missions. In that regard I find it interesting that the C‘s over the years seem to have alluded to the fact that those aligned with Cassiopaea (or those that are in the prozess of doing so) might be a bit different/distinct from other groups, just as if each group is supposed to fulfill a greater STO mission from different angles? The last possible allusion to that was maybe in the last session:



So for some STO candidates it might be true that they might be aligned to another facet of STO where for example personal martyrdom and/or being much more directly in the weeds are the way/mission? Which might mean that this must not be what those aligned with Cassiopaea are supposed to be doing?
Click to expand...
I have to agree with both you and that beautiful post by @luc ! Bravo! :clap:

As many of you may know from my post in the How Are You Feeling thread, I’m just a few days home from a week in the hospital from literal brain poisoning (hepatic encephalopathy), and I’m still foggy. So seeing as this thread is fast approaching 600 posts (!), I hope you’ll excuse me jumping into it here instead of reading my way through the whole thing (though I wish I could).🙂
 
We heard similar things about Crooks re - unusual visits at his home

UPDATE: Charlie KirkCandace Owens claims to have Spoken to the Family of Tyler Robinson’s Trans Boyfriend — There was an Unusual Amount of Vehicles at their home leading up to the Assassination Boyfriend Lance Twiggs.. allegedly - parents kicked him out - he almost overdosed- showed up on drugs on Easter, spouting political stuff - family is unhappy the media is presenting him as a soft person- he was a “deep web” “dark web” person, always online- he was doing some kind of plumbing work for money- He and Tyler were living together for at least 1 year The most interesting claim… people in the neighborhood, as well as Twiggs family, says there was an “unusual amount of traffic/cars” at their home in the days/week leading up to the shooting.
Click to expand...

https://twitter.com/x/status/1968075054211559513
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom