Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history

[luc]

It was like complete melt down. Latest is Ian Carroll.

Just a note that Ian Carrol didn't attack Candace here, he just recounts how in his view the "Donors tied to shut him up" story developped, and Candace's role in it. This Zionist shill Eyal Yakobi then tries to frame this as a grand conspiracy of Israel haters working in concert to push that "false story".

Agreed that the attacks on Candace are relentless, but mostly come from the Zionists, as well as (to a smaller extent) a few influencers who desperately want to distance themselves from the Israel angle.

 

[Jefferson]

Was Kirk, perhaps, 'not meant to' die?

A ricochet off the top edge of your armor plate and straight into your jugular vein seems extremely unlucky, and it supports the government narrative that Kirk was 'killed by an amateur lone nutter' (although that doesn't exclude prior manipulation of him by 'experts').

Kirk's chances of surviving a 30.06 cal bullet from 140 yards directly into his plate would have been, what, 50-50?

This has been a recurring thought to me. The shot was at him from the front, and it didnt matter if he died or not (50-50?) - however, just like higher Consortium intervened so the bullet magically missed Trump, it could have been higher density Consortium intervention that caused the almost magical fragmentation/ ricochet/ neck redirection of the bullet to kill Charlie instantly? (i.e. program change)

Divine intervention to take a life?

 

[FM258]

I'm sorry, I wasn't aware that what was discussed on the video had been 'debunked' or eclipsed by better information/analysis. Could you please point out which one of the points he made regarding ballistics (because he said he didn't have time to go into all the other inconsistencies) has been proven incorrect? It sure would be handy to have the autopsy report!

1. The FBI is lying (funnily enough, many military and ex-military people have difficulty with this concept, although the presenter obviously doesn't, as this sentiment is prominently displayed behind him).

2. Kirk was not shot with a .30-06, as it would have "made a bigger hole". He guessing at a 556.

3. Kirk was not wearing body armour. The mic was clipped to the outside of his shirt to the cord that ran beneath his shirt, which wound around his neck and connected to his earpiece in his right ear.

4. The wound on the neck is an exit wound not an entry wound, meaning he was shot from behind, or behind and to the side, not from the front.

Some of these things should be easy to prove of disprove if we had correct information. Has there been any further information (that is reliable) forthcoming?

After watching dozens (feels like 100s) of videos on this, I agree with most of this.

In addition, I dont see any talk of this kids state of mind....youve seen him in from of the judge, does he not look like hes in a trance? MKUltra is a real possibility.

He did get off a shot, but my theory is it was a decoy(his shot totally missed, or was a blank...remember if he was MKUltra, he could believe it was a live round, and also believe he killed Kirk), and as the boom of that shot echoed, he was shot from his right side... Ive been shooting my AR15 for decades...the sight alignment has to be rezeroed every year, and If I broke the rifle down and reassembled it, theres no way its accurate to 150 yrds. Have not seen this talked about anywhere.

I have never shot a 30.06, but I have talked with a lot of military friends and snipers and they are clear, that neck wound was not a 30.06 entrance wound.

I hope the Cs will shed light on this, its a devastating loss to christian conservatives. Never have I seen a more eloquent and knowledgeable speaker willing to have open mic debate, and do so calmly and without getting amped up. He was influencing young voters to leave the liberal left, and they were. And to have him die in front of his family and on camera is also super disturbing.