Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history

[hiker]

I'm seriously looking at a device under the table fired thick, blunt and tumbling projectiles. That's the only thing I can think of that would make an entry wound like that and catch the T shirt like it did.

Laura reposted this clip on X: some kind of projectile appears to fly from a low angle towards Charlie's neck.

According to the poster, there was apparently a trap door positioned in front of him, from which the projectile could have been shot. I understood that a bullet can't be captured with normal video footage, so possibly it was a slower moving slug, shot with a gun that won't produce an exit wound. Also, the shot would have had to be completely silenced with a muffler and synchronized with a rifle shot (a blank) coming from farther away.

In the end though, it could be just a case of doctored footage.

Anyways, thought that it could be worth posting.

there does appear to be some kind of projectile traveling in front of his right thigh, could it be the one captured in frame behind him after initial penetration?

there’s also the “maintenance door” or “trap door” that’s been shown somewhere below Charlie, but quickly paved over, could the shot have come from below?

https://twitter.com/x/status/1969243925547233685

 

[luc]

I've many questions, but first among them is: why are we learning the first autopsy details via Andrew Kolvet and not directly from the coroner himself?

Yeah, sounds like damage control after Candace's confirmation that there is no exit wound. Maybe Kolvet himself sought to clarify it with the coroner or whoever handles this told the coroner to come forward with this. It all sounds very sloppy, as does a lot about this cover-up. They don't seem to have a plan and just make sh*t up as they go along.

 

[luc]

According to the poster, there was apparently a trap door positioned in front of him, from which the projectile could have been shot. I understood that a bullet can't be captured with normal video footage, so possibly it was a slower moving slug, shot with a gun that won't produce an exit wound. Also, the shot would have had to be completely silenced with a muffler and synchronized with a rifle shot (a blank) coming from farther away.

There's one wild theory by a guy claiming it might have been a "directed charge" hidden in the transmitter for his lavalier mic. The theory is basically that some sort of plastic explosive had been prepared within the battery compartment, and that it somehow turned the mic (which is clipped via a magnet on top of his shirt, with the transmitter behind the shirt) into a projectile, shooting upwards into his neck:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1968489707563549064

I don't see how on earth this could possibly work, and it looks nothing like the "pager attacks" for example. Also, it would have needed to be synchronized with the shot, which I guess isn't impossible (has anyone tried to match the audio from the shot with the visible impact/reaction?), but still way out there.

Although the idea of a shockwave "from below" doesn't seem impossible considering the movement of the shirt. At the very least, maybe we should consider different possibilities and that whoever planned this thing, ignoring some "cosmic angle" for the moment, might have done it in a more sophisticated way than we think, anticipating the "dot connecting" spree in the internet age.

 

[Phill4]

This guys is a spine suregon explaining in a short that the point of impact may not have been spinal injury but brain stem injury instead. He has more shorts explaining the type of impact

 

[Niall]

It all sounds very sloppy, as does a lot about this cover-up. They don't seem to have a plan and just make sh*t up as they go along.

That's how it seems, which is prolly by design!

Joe and I have noticed in past 'deep state hit-jobs' that the authorities are slow to release info afterwards because they're observing what online sleuths - and thus the wider 'vox populi' - are noticing about their operation. They'll be sure they have it all stitched up from the get-go, but then they'll be having glaring 'holes' pointed out to them, so they sit back and 'leak' info and narrative 'amendments' accordingly.

 

[luc]

LOL

https://twitter.com/x/status/1969625483907383411

 

[luc]

That's how it seems, which is prolly by design!

Joe and I have noticed in past 'deep state hit-jobs' that the authorities are slow to release info afterwards because they're observing what online sleuths - and thus the wider 'vox populi' - are noticing about their operation. They'll be sure they have it all stitched up from the get-go, but then they'll be having glaring 'holes' pointed out to them, so they sit back and 'leak' info and narrative 'amendments' accordingly.

That makes a lot of sense - basically dripping information and using the internet sleuths doing the work for them by uncovering possible plot holes, then filling them.

But come on... Superman diddit!?

 

[Niall]

That makes a lot of sense - basically dripping information and using the internet sleuths doing the work for them by uncovering possible plot holes, then filling them.

But come on... Superman diddit!?

This is another 'separating the wheat from the chaff' moment.

The emotional investment in Kirk as a 'true follower of Christ' and thus 'a martyr' means there are many who will readily believe that Kirk did something miraculous, even in death.

This angle they're going with is risible to us, but it might actually play well with 'normie Judeo-Christian' Americans.

Coincidentally, or not, this announcement coincides with Kirk's memorial (followed by his actual burial?) today, and, in the atmosphere of grief and sorrow, will 're-cement' their faith in 'the One True American Marvel Comic' version of Christianity.

 

[luc]

This angle they're going with is risible to us, but it might actually play well with 'normie Judeo-Christian' Americans.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1969681154757288344

 

[Niall]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1969681154757288344

That's creepier than you realize!

The two creators of the Superman comic book, Joe Shuster and Jerry Siegel, were Jews, and the case can be made that their 'inspiration' or model for Superman was Moses. To be clear, however, the authors themselves never claimed such. See also here under 'Religious Themes'.

So, is "merging Jesus with Superman [Moses]" ... metaphorical for 'Judeo-Christianity'?!

 

[luc]

So, is "merging Jesus with Superman [Moses]" ... metaphorical for 'Judeo-Christianity'?!

Come to think of it, people had already been primed to accept "miracles" because of the Butler event. I don't think without it there could have ever been a critical mass to swallow "Man of Steel". Now? Not so sure... (Although judging by the response on X, people seem sceptical, to say the least.)

 

[Ryan]

The emotional investment in Kirk as a 'true follower of Christ' and thus 'a martyr' means there are many who will readily believe that Kirk did something miraculous, even in death.

This angle they're going with is risible to us, but it might actually play well with 'normie Judeo-Christian' Americans.

Yep.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1969642738451628034

It could blow back on them once a few of those 'normie J-C' types calm down and think a bit more about it, though. If the govt are planning on 'Luigi Mangione'ing' Tyler Robinson, then his family and their supporters are likely to kick up a stink, possibly with the assistance of Tucker, Candace et al.

Personally, I think the narrative is going to fall apart unless 'something' happens to distract everyone.

 

[Jones]

Well, well, well.

'Magic bullet' it is!

Or rather, 'magic-target-who-made-ordinary-bullet-do-magic-things'!

Here's the post on X:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1969551427648569633

Here's the text in case the narrative shifts again and Kolvet deletes his post:


I've many questions, but first among them is: why are we learning the first autopsy details via Andrew Kolvet and not directly from the coroner himself?

Here's a reply to the above that's not buying it:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1969647000313614706

Let’s Dissect Andrew Kolvet’s “Miracle” StatementAndrew Kolvet, a Turning Point USA media handler, released a statement that reads like it was written by a crisis PR firm scrambling to patch up a failing narrative.

Let’s break it down, line by line:

1. “I’m usually not interested in delving into online chatter…”
Translation: “I don’t usually respond to conspiracy drivel… but let me make an exception this time.”This is the classic defensive opener: discredit public speculation while subtly signaling moral authority — as if his involvement should automatically be trusted.

2. “I just spoke with the surgeon who worked on Charlie in the hospital…”
Problem: Charlie died instantly from a gunshot wound that caused decerebrate posturing, massive arterial bleeding, and catastrophic CNS trauma.
Let’s be clear: he wasn’t “worked on”. He was dead on arrival — if not at the scene, then certainly before any meaningful medical intervention. Unless Kolvet thinks surgeons perform autopsies, this claim is either fabricated or a willful misuse of medical terminology to sell emotional closure.

3. “The bullet should’ve gone through… it would’ve killed a moose… but it didn’t…
”This is the “trust me bro” forensic analysis from someone with no background in terminal ballistics, gunshot trauma, or even basic anatomy. If the bullet lodged beneath the skin, that suggests low velocity, deflection, or inconsistency in caliber used — none of which support the idea of a clean high-powered rifle kill. Also: where’s the actual ballistics report?

4. “His bones were so strong, like the man of steel.”

Now we’re just fully in the realm of myth-making. Turning a human corpse into Superman doesn’t just defy science — it tells you exactly what this is: A psychological operation meant to close the book on forensic doubt and redirect the public into emotional worship of the martyr.

5. “Even in death, Charlie managed to save others. Remarkable. Miraculous.”
This is narrative closure layered on top of miracle-language. In legal or psychological terms, this is called “preemptive emotional closure” — used to block further questioning by dressing tragedy in divine finality.

When a known TPUSA employee uses miracle-language, contradictory medical claims, and a triple “trust me” format — all without forensic transparency — it’s not just cringe. It’s coordinated damage control. The truth doesn’t require miracles. It leaves evidence.

 

[RedFox]

So the bullet that actually kills someone (type, behaviour when it hits the body, and where it was shot from, as well as the weapon that was used) is "low down the list of things to consider"? Holly Smoke! We must be from different planets!

I apologise, I could have written that better.
To be precise, I think the order of consideration for the type of shot (as a basic hierarchy for beginning each analysis) should be as follows:
1) shot came from the front, the wound we see is an entry wound
2) the shot came from the left, the wound we see is an exit wound
3) the shot came from the front, the wound we see is an exit wound

Hence, lower on the list of consideration.
Hope that makes it clear.

That's how it seems, which is prolly by design!

Joe and I have noticed in past 'deep state hit-jobs' that the authorities are slow to release info afterwards because they're observing what online sleuths - and thus the wider 'vox populi' - are noticing about their operation. They'll be sure they have it all stitched up from the get-go, but then they'll be having glaring 'holes' pointed out to them, so they sit back and 'leak' info and narrative 'amendments' accordingly.

Well that makes perfect sense. Maybe I’m being paranoid, but I swear the quality of the videos online of this event get worse each day. Like they are being obfuscated, either deliberately or just as a result of re uploading already uploaded videos.

This way all remaining needles in the haystack can be removed by those wanting the truth.
Anything left can be drowned out by noise.

I suspect it will play out like Butler - but even then their are some inconsistencies, like the patsy not having been killed.

 

[Brewer]

Also, the shot would have had to be completely silenced with a muffler and synchronized with a rifle shot (a blank) coming from farther away.

Or it's gas powered, an air gun with a silencer, very quiet and the desk in front would help dampen the sound, especially if fired from a hole underground. No bang, no flash, no cordite smell. They make compact bullpup air rifles powerful enough to take down deer and bigger animals at 60 meters. Interesting video. Thanks.