Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history

[Bluegazer]

If we have to look for clues in a 1998 movie to solve Charlie's murder, the PTB are really taking us for a ride! In the movie, it seems like Tyler was also an innocent patsie who received "signals" and "was never told that anyone would be killed." And, of course, there is a real sniper, and the usual Palestine/Israel dynamic with the USA in the middle. How fitting!

Snake Eyes (1998 film) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The C's once said: "'Snake eyes' is not so good as 7,11, eh?"
...and then they followed up by asking: "Think of it, what is the Judaic Christian legend for the creation of a woman?"
...and then they made a political link: "What happens in a "Primary." and "Who gets "picked" to run?"
...and then they made a reference to the mystics: "Name the primary mystical organizations for key to clue system."

I think what the C's were referring to there was that the system is designed to be a time loop and keep us prisoners.

 

[luc]

According to this guy, the plane never turned off its transponder:

Yep, this caught my eye too when the story first went viral, since I know a little bit about how ADS-B etc. work. Seems people online just got confused about all this.

Basically, flight control stations use radar to track aircraft, which has nothing to do with transponders. Then, there's the transponder (ADS-B) which is a secondary system making things easier - anybody can receive those signals with a simple scanner or even a Raspberry Pi. This is how things like FlightRadar work: volunteers all over the world set up receivers for ADS-B and feed what they get into the system, which then gets aggregated and plotted on a map etc. These days this may even be done officially by bodies like the FAA (they have an official data feed).

Now, I just looked up LADD: due to privacy concerns, the FAA established a program called LADD (Limiting Aircraft Data Displayed), which enables aircraft operators to request to block identifiable info from the FAA data feeds.

It's important to understand that this doesn't stop the transponder, and the data remains accessible to the flight controllers - it just filters public dissemination. However, anybody with a scanner/radio receiver could still receive the signals and fully decode them (they are not encrypted at all).

Needless to say, if you are the MOSSAD or whatever, here's how you would NOT go about hiding your shenanigans: sending an email to the FAA to request your flight data be filtered when it goes out to FlightRadar, while it still gets sent via radio, is still read by flight controllers, and remains available in all kinds of databases :)


EDIT: I was wondering about how they prevent the volunteer networks from pumping out the data, and there's another initiative for that:

LADD only addresses the use of data through FAA data systems. Non-FAA, third-party data sources are able to capture ICAO aircraft addresses directly from ADS-B Out transmissions.

To address the privacy concerns with access to this data, the FAA has created the Privacy ICAO Address (PIA) program, which allows operators to use alternate, temporary ICAO aircraft addresses that aren’t tied to an operator in the Civil Aviation Registry (CAR). For the maximum level of privacy, operators should participate in both the LADD and PIA programs.

Would be interesting to see if the data from the plane in question still shows up on the volunteer network (as opposed to the official FAA feed).

 

[Bluegazer]

aka Assassination script writers are copying Hollywood script writers. Is Hollywood script writers are copying from some where or somebody putting in their head? we may never know.

Hollywood is a think tank. Who owns Hollywood? And let's not forget the Thor pantheon who project their ideas.

 

[Benjamin]

I had thought of this but I suspected the full family name might have more meaning.

On my last walk before bed, I was thinking about Mauser and came up with something else. I thought I better write it while it's still fresh.

A "mouse-catcher" sounds like an 'exterminator of vermin'. I then remembered an old Nazi propaganda film that I saw parts of in school. The film Der Ewige Jude (The Eternal Jew) from 1940 has a section starting at 16:13 where Jews are equated to rats. My idea is a bit far fetched but, what if the "mouse-catcher" rifle was never meant to be the murder weapon but is instead being used as a symbol?

 

[Niall]

Just a note to say that, at the outset of her show from 23 Sept - the one in which she shares her exchange with the guy who filmed someone "wearing all-black tactical gear, including face-mask and helmet" in a prone position on the roof of the Losee Building moments before the assassination - Owens says "I know for a fact that Kirk wasn't wearing an ear-piece and a bullet-proof vest":

 

[Seppo Ilmarinen]

To my eye, Robinson comes across as somewhat ”mechanical” in that short clip, and I guess he could be more or less on the spectrum. If so, it’s probably one of the reasons for him having been susceptible to brainwashing.

There's also this police bodycam footage from 2022 after Robinson had crashed with another car. He is being cooperative, bit awkward, but seems otherwise normal. If he was radicalized/groomed already he is concealing it well (e.g doesn't have the typical leftist snowflake meltdown or erratic behavior that might be expected from assumed fanatic interacting with law officer in this context).

It does seem that the accident was probably Robinson's fault, as the traffic lights may have already been red when he was crossing the intersection. And at 2:40 Robinson looks like mumbling to himself in a weird manner when his brother explains to police why he said to other driver it was their fault.

But what I was wondering is how this bodycam footage was still available and given to media, as there was no criminal charges or serious injuries caused by the accident, which I assume that after 3 years this type of bodycam footage would not have no longer been retained.

 

[Niall]

There's also this police bodycam footage from 2022 after Robinson had crashed with another car. He is being cooperative, bit awkward, but seems otherwise normal. If he was radicalized/groomed already he is concealing it well (e.g doesn't have the typical leftist snowflake meltdown or erratic behavior that might be expected from assumed fanatic interacting with law officer in this context).

It does seem that the accident was probably Robinson's fault, as the traffic lights may have already been red when he was crossing the intersection. And at 2:40 Robinson looks like mumbling to himself in a weird manner when his brother explains to police why he said to other driver it was their fault.

But what I was wondering is how this bodycam footage was still available and given to media, as there was no criminal charges or serious injuries caused by the accident, which I assume that after 3 years this type of bodycam footage would not have no longer been retained.

No longer retained by the specific local agencies, but nothing is ever truly 'deleted' in a digital world, so you can be sure that intel agencies will easily retrieve it.

 

[Niall]

Today there was another shooting which I find a little puzzling. This shooter apparently scribbles on his bullets too. It feeds into the current climate of wanting to frame the left and Tyler Robinson as the killer of CK. It also talks about accelerationists, a term I hadn't heard about 2 weeks ago, yet now it is supposedly a common thing. To me it is just a little suspicious.

Trump To Sign EO Targeting 'Domestic Terror Networks' After "Despicable" Attack At Dallas ICE Facility | ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

And a tweet from the FBI chief with a picture of the alleged bullets:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1970877754221498599

Edit: I am posting it here as I think this latest shooting is linked to the murder of CK. Whether it was a brainwashed manchurian candidate or somebody otherwise triggered is hard to say, but it feeds into the current hysteria/anger and the push for revenge against the left and making laws to control the population even more. Dangerous times.

Very suspicious, not least because the premise of the attack is that it's a Leftist attacking "a symbol of Trump's America" - ICE agents cracking down on illegal immigrants - but the actual deed saw said Leftist shoot at detained migrants.. using bullets scrawled with "anti-ICE." The perfect recipe to, again, inflame both Left and Right.

 

[Seppo Ilmarinen]

No longer retained by the specific local agencies, but nothing is ever truly 'deleted' in a digital world, so you can be sure that intel agencies will easily retrieve it.

Yeah, that's where I was going for, and whenever they started grooming him, the footage could also have been flagged or retrieved already in advance.

 

[Niall]

If we have to look for clues in a 1998 movie to solve Charlie's murder, the PTB are really taking us for a ride! In the movie, it seems like Tyler was also an innocent patsie who received "signals" and "was never told that anyone would be killed." And, of course, there is a real sniper, and the usual Palestine/Israel dynamic with the USA in the middle. How fitting!

Snake Eyes (1998 film) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The C's once said: "'Snake eyes' is not so good as 7,11, eh?"
...and then they followed up by asking: "Think of it, what is the Judaic Christian legend for the creation of a woman?"
...and then they made a political link: "What happens in a "Primary." and "Who gets "picked" to run?"
...and then they made a reference to the mystics: "Name the primary mystical organizations for key to clue system."

Interesting connections!

I think the main significance of this similarity of the Kirk assassination with that 1998 movie is likely to be what the Cs answered here in reference to the Sandy Hook massacre:

Q: (Andromeda) What about all the coincidences with the Batman movie, with the Sandy Hook reference in the Batman movie? (Perceval) Is that something like that 9/11 mass consciousness signaling to itself?

A: Yes. The cosmic mind sends many clues, but who is listening? And you know what the result of not listening is!

 

[Joe]

Streamed 5 hours ago, a new Candace vid [47:34]:

At 37:50 she mentions that her impression is that many people she has met since the Kirk assassination have responding by "realizing they need to go back to church".

Maybe an intended outcome? Or a mistake by those who carried out the assassination? Suppose it depends.