Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history

[seek10]

Erika Kirk was on the show now and similar to the video with her husband from about 6 months ago she comes across pretty normal, decent and reasonable to me:

Erika's comments and demeanor as a head of the organization with a specific aim is very professional. Given that she knows this day is coming (because of all the threats and hints) and being a trusted wife and partner in all of his projects, she knows all the backstories, thoughts, worries, strategies that accompanied with it and the end result. That can be the result of what she mentioned 'Charlie prepared all of us'.

Is it too perfect in our reality that filled with all sorts of conspiracies? If she wants to weed out the inside backstabbers and one doesn't know who that is, her posture is expected - 'Keep doing what we are already doing' mode.

In any case, she didn't address any of the contentious topics in this video to know what exactly her take on Who (that is obvious) and how (Does it matter in the context of the power of perps and mentioned aim) and on how she wants to survive.

 

[Niall]

The neck is visibly swollen at the time of the shot in a few videos so it's definitely not an artifact or trick of the light.

I'm pretty sure the Paramount Tactical guy made note of the swelling of Charlie's head/neck/chest in one of his videos as well.



A monkey wrench indeed!

That would move the investigation from a Crooks case to a Mangione case.

I encourage everyone to not use Crooks or any other mass shooting/assassination as their 'baseline heuristic' for analyzing what is and is not possible in this instance. Each one, when you drill down into them, was different, although they shared similar, overlapping elements. The Butler attempt was actually highly unusual in that the patsy was intended to be the actual vector of assassination. With the exception of fictional scenarios, as in Manchurian Candidate type movies, I don't recall that ever happening in any high-profile shooting (other than at Butler). The patsy is usually just serving the function of being 'in the area' or even, in the Sandy Hook case, 'holding a gun', and so he's useful for post-op narrative purposes, but otherwise he's functionally useless.

The assassination of RFK, which the Kirk one reminds me most of because of similarities in their social and geopolitical connections or ramifications, had a 'mind-programmed' patsy who was not only 'physically there', he was holding and firing a gun, but all of his bullets missed the target. The conspirators apparently anticipated that, hence the real assassin was right next to RFK, ready to kill him at point-blank range behind his right ear the moment Sirhan Sirhan began shooting erratically.

Finally, in the USA, since the 60s and until very recently, most political assassinations are 'stealth assassinations' - car accidents, plane accidents, heart-attacks, 'falls', 'burglaries', etc. Andrew Breitbart 'dropped dead' after leaving a restaurant in L.A. (public verdict: heart attack) - Micheal Hastings's vehicle was driven, probably remotely, at high speed into a wall (public verdict: car accident) - Seth Rich was shot dead in the middle of DC 'while being mugged'. Now, that changed recently with Butler, because soon afterwards you had Brian Thompson, the United Healthcare CEO, being publicly assassinated by a pro, and Mangione being framed for it. Here, with the Kirk assassination, you have the third 'political' assassination in a row where the public is meant to see it as a political assassination.

 

[Gaby]

Slightly off-topic... Just to mention here, that one of history's "miracle" was the bullet that hit Pope John Paul II. I remember reading in an encyclopedia during the 80s, that the bullet zigzagged against all odds. Now with the internet, I can't find any reference about it. Despite the "miracle", there was an entry and exit wound by the bullet. Ok, I found a story covering the zigzag trajectory:

It was not possible for the bullet to be carried in a zigzag mode | Fondazione Vaticana Giovanni Paolo II

Father Stanislaw Dziwisz gives him the last anointing. He realized that John Paul II might not survive. Then, Professor Crucitti proceeds to the operation, which was supposed to take nearly six hours and change the entire world. The conversation I had with him eight years later is one of the...

fjp2.com

Father Stanislaw Dziwisz gives him the last anointing. He realized that John Paul II might not survive. Then, Professor Crucitti proceeds to the operation, which was supposed to take nearly six hours and change the entire world. The conversation I had with him eight years later is one of the most important moments of my life. I knew it would have such an impact even before I went to him to ask what was going on that night when he saved the Pope’s life. I knew that I would ask him a question that could radically change my life; that I would ask him: “Can you really show me a picture that proves God’s existence?” Even before our meeting, Professor Crucitti made it clear to me that, I would have to honor the doctor-patient confidentiality and he will not reveal medical secrets of his patients. However, I did not expect it. (…) In the end, I asked him a question that lay so much on my heart:

– Does that X-ray show that God exists?

He looked at me and pondered, and then once again he made a sketch on a piece of paper of the situation.

– The bullet pierced the Pope’s abdomen and torn apart of the intestines, actually it should have hit the organs and blood vessels relevant to life and health but adopted a very peculiar trajectory.

– Why peculiar?

– It looked as if something invisible changed the direction of the bullet, moved it away from all organs, as if it had made a bend in the body of the Pope, which, after all, is actually impossible.

– Do you want to say that some intangible force has shifted the trajectory of the bullet and that the Pope would have died if the bullet had not had an unspecified obstacle in his body? What was it? A miracle in the Pope’s body?

– I am a doctor, not a theologian, but I know what Pope John Paul II said: “Someone’s hand was shooting, but another hand was leading the bullet.” I think he was right. It was not possible for the bullet to be carried in a zigzag mode. Something changed the direction of its run. Of course, throughout Rome there was a rumor that it was only as a result of the miracle that the Pope was able to survive the assassination.

Andreas Englisch – Healer. Miracles of Saint John Paul II

WAM Publishing House. Jesuit Priests. Krakow 2015

 

[palestine]

The bump is visible on a video, and I did not see it at first glance:

 

[Chu]

I'm not sure that this hasn't already been posted, but just in case, I just saw this, FWIW:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1971131761544339782

It says:

Behind the Mic: Israel’s Motives in Silencing Charlie Kirk
Edip Yuksel
25 September 2025

Yes, this is the clearest explanation so far!

The device disguised as a microphone appears to have been tampered with. Instead of functioning as normal audio equipment, it allegedly contained a small charge of plastic explosive, wired to a battery pack hidden under Charlie Kirk’s shirt; possibly alongside a Kevlar-style vest to disguise bulk.

The design suggests it was intended for remote detonation.

Because the decoy microphone failed to operate as expected, organizers had to hand him a standard wireless microphone instead. That failure may have prevented the plan from moving forward.

From a technical standpoint, this method is consistent with modern covert operations: explosives can be concealed inside everyday objects such as microphones, cell phones, or even medical devices, triggered remotely with compact circuitry.

Israel’s intelligence services, especially Mossad, are known for such precision methods—combining expertise in disguise, access to equipment, and operational reach in foreign countries.

Israel would have had both the motive and capability to target Kirk. As he was shifting toward a strongly anti-Israel stance, silencing him before his full break and simultaneously exploiting his name posthumously would align with the interests of those seeking to control narratives.

History shows that Israel has not hesitated to use assassination as a political tool.

It has eliminated numerous leaders in the Middle East and recently even admitted to mass attacks using hidden explosives—such as the operation where pagers were detonated to kill and wound thousands.

Finally, Charlie’s security was reportedly managed by an Israeli-linked team. If true, this would make infiltration or orchestration of such an attempt far easier, as the layers of protection were already under their control.

And this one:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1970981513207693787

The mag clip. This is the object that struck his neck. A shaped charge hidden in the battery of the RODE Wireless PRO transmitter detonated and sent the magnetic clasp flying into his neck.

(It has images of the device and a clip where you can see Charlie lifting his shirt for a second, and it does look like he has a device that size right under.)

At the end they have this picture:



He does look quite a lot like the guy in this picture: Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history

 

[Approaching Infinity]

I can't see how a chain/crucifix, propelled by localized ballooning skin would have enough energy to lift a shirt neckline level with the ear.

Finally, I've shot deer and large pigs at close range in the chest with heavy caliber bullets to ensure they're dead, an apparently well hit and dead deer or pig can get up and run. There's no weird asymmetric bulges, just a ripple from the shock wave radiating from the entry point.

Thanks again! Even in that video, the "ripple" looks quite energetic and violent. Same in this one (timestamp 2:40):

That's several G's of force being absorbed and redistributed by the body in a split second. Either way, it makes me more excited to see what Gary is able to shot in the tests he's working on. (See the livestream I posted further above for some descriptions of what he's going to be trying: all kinds of 30-06 ammo, ballistic dummies, and forms of armor, with clothing and presumably necklace.)

 

[Joe]

If I had to call it, I'd say it was a modified mic, underneath the clip, that detonates and sends something into his neck. The "puff of smoke" lines up with the mic under the magnet.

 

[Joe]

Sure would be nice if we had this HD video.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1969792911475659179

 

[JEEP]

Had read it earlier today on account of Laurent Guyénot writing it

Right there, all of Gueynot's past work must be critically examined and not taken at face-value.

That Laurent Guyénot was the author of the "theory" was also the reason I read it, particularly as I had already decided such an assertion was la la land thinking, completely absurd. But, comment posts are showing he's not credible any longer (and maybe never was). That this idea is just another Sandy Hook/Boston Marathon scenario repeat. I'm thinking, though, that there was also something like the Sandy Hook writing on a map that the Cs commented on, but it escapes me now. Too much info to remember it all - just like I think there was previously more info concerning the shirt mic that I couldn't mentally retrieve either.

That said, there are shenanigans' aplenty, as can be seen.

Absolutely, and as Joe has said, we have to assess probabilities. The predominant thought is all these "shenanigans" are to reinforce the "Tyler did it" lone gunman official narrative. And extreme control about what we've been allowed to see is very much a part of it:

Based on other post vids, there were 3 to 4 drones over the scene and nobody's supposed to know about them. Tactics were utilized to prevent recording of them in the sky, but one guy at least was prepared with tech backup that allowed him to continue recording when others could not.

And, the infamous brown shirt has a distinct large check pattern which goes to show how indistinct all these vids that have been posted are.

Couldn't help but notice similarity to UFO footage - always blurry/fuzzy and lacking in detail. And, we're still waiting for the clear camera footage of all the ones attached to campus buildings.

Lastly, the guy from Texas got the vid that showed a campus camera could capture the roof where Tyler supposedly shot from, but that footage hasn't been shown assuming the camera was working. The FBI's poor and incomplete footage of the exit from the roof certainly gives credence to a coverup and false narrative being formulated

Seeing a pattern here? And even Candace has asked why hasn't TPUSA released their footage from their cameras. And how about that incident of the student being interviewed about what he saw who was almost immediately all but tackled to stop him from talking! How can we not conclude that a very big visual coverup has taken place? And the question - why such extreme measures? What are they really hiding? Should we play Devil's Advocate at all - Prove Me Wrong?

After even contemplating the "he's not dead" idea, I remembered Candace saying in her very recent vid (paraphrased) that she hasn't quite processed that Charlie is dead - that she expects to see him again (because she has yet to accept the finality of his death). But then, that has it's own peculiarity now with all the very strange oddities and with her coming out with her latest vid.

And then there's the trap door that brings up the underground tunnels. All kinds of rumors of ones at Tyler's home and throughout this general region of Utah. Do they play a role in this at all? Also, the plane that took off and flew out of tracking range - and the one that may have released drones. Way too many unanswered questions along with hot speculation.

The likely probability is Kirk is actually dead, but way too much weirdness not to keep our eyes and logic attuned. Just sayin'.

ADDED: It was Barbara Olson, who made the impossible phone call from Flight 77, who was later surmised to have been "resurrected" with a new identity and (re)married Ted Olson. There were before and after pics of her that allowed for this premise. Don't recall if that was discussed in a session.

 

[JEEP]

And the question - why such extreme measures? What are they really hiding?

I'll answer my own question -

a) the shirt mic was the weapon that made the kill shot
b) The mic hid a squib and the whole thing was a staged death

A is going to be the most likely and acceptable answer.

ADDED: There were reports of people attesting they saw Charlie hit in the chest - unsurprisingly suppressed.

 

[Ricardo]

ADDED: It was Barbara Olson, who made the impossible phone call from Flight 77, who was later surmised to have been "resurrected" with a new identity and (re)married Ted Olson. There were before and after pics of her that allowed for this premise. Don't recall if that was discussed in a session.

Barbara Olson is mentioned on transcripts ( Link ) :

Session 20 October 2005 :

(...)

Q: (Perceval) Let’s get some of that real-time voice morphing technology! (Galahad) Did Barbara Olson really phone?

A: Oh yes!

Q: (Galahad) If she was in on it, why would she phone?

A: She was “in on it” but it was not supposed to include Flt 77.

Q: (Galahad) That means there was a double-cross! (Perceval) Hang on, let’s not jump to conclusions! Is Laura correct in her hypothesis that she was in some way kidnapped or being used as insurance… is that the case?

A: Close.

Q: What would make it closer?

A: Insurance, blackmail, and the “bearer of bad tidings.”

Q: (Galahad) So it seems she was phoning to let her husband know that things were not going as planned. (L) Boy, talk about being hoisted on your own petard, huh? (Perceval) The entire operation was not meant to include Flight 77.

A: Correct.

(...)

 

[JEEP]

(Galahad) Did Barbara Olson really phone?

A: Oh yes!

I stand corrected. I included her call with the others from the hijacked planes that were proven to be impossible.

 

[Mrs. Peel]

I stand corrected. I included her call with the others from the hijacked planes that were proven to be impossible

But did she phone from the plane when it was in the air?

 

[Approaching Infinity]

I'm not sure that this hasn't already been posted, but just in case, I just saw this, FWIW:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1971131761544339782

It says:

He writes: "Because the decoy microphone failed to operate as expected, organizers had to hand him a standard wireless microphone instead. That failure may have prevented the plan from moving forward." If I'm interpreting this right, he's saying the lapel mic with explosives failed to operate as a mic, so Kirk had to use the standard microphone. The problem with this is that Kirk consistently used both microphones during his events, so the idea that the lapel mic malfunctioned is just a guess. Check out this video from an event in Michigan in April:

He's using both the standard microphone, and you can see the magnetic clip holding the lapel mic under his jacket.

 

[JEEP]

But did she phone from the plane when it was in the air?

I'm thinking now that the plane was still on the ground.

Don't have the quote of what the Cs said about explosive(?) revelations soon to occur that would reveal the man behind the curtain and by association, the lies about 911. Will this event be that incident or something yet to come?

He's using both the standard microphone, and you can see the magnetic clip holding the label mic under his jacket.

It's my understanding that the shirt mic's function wasn't as an auxiliary mic, but to record the event for Charlie's later use.