Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history

But did she phone from the plane when it was in the air?
I'm thinking now that the plane was still on the ground.

Don't have the quote of what the Cs said about explosive(?) revelations soon to occur that would reveal the man behind the curtain and by association, the lies about 911. Will this event be that incident or something yet to come?

He's using both the standard microphone, and you can see the magnetic clip holding the label mic under his jacket.
It's my understanding that the shirt mic's function wasn't as an auxiliary mic, but to record the event for Charlie's later use.
 
It's my understanding that the shirt mic's function wasn't as an auxiliary mic, but to record the event for Charlie's later use.
Yep, thanks. That was my understanding too.

FWIW, Grok thinks it's highly speculative but conceivable that a shaped charge could deliver enough force to damage the chest and kill a person without ejecting the magnet.

 
The Butler attempt was actually highly unusual in that the patsy was intended to be the actual vector of assassination. With the exception of fictional scenarios, as in Manchurian Candidate type movies, I don't recall that ever happening in any high-profile shooting (other than at Butler).

Which makes me wonder if this assassination is "one of a kind" as well? Decidedly different in that an ordinary device that was always utilized, and thus, unsuspected, was the means to kill. Dunno, but is intense questioning by so many internet sleuths closing in on exposing that this is what actually killed Charlie? The previous pager incidents didn't exactly help the intended deceit.

I'm thinking, though, that there was also something like the Sandy Hook writing on a map that the Cs commented on, but it escapes me now. Too much info to remember it all - just like I think there was previously more info concerning the shirt mic that I couldn't mentally retrieve either.
Maybe I was thinking of the Snake Eyes movie, although it's been shown more than once that movie/TV shows do predictive programming supposedly because "they" have to tell us in advance what they're going to do. And the shirt mic, maybe that it was put on in reverse/upside down or something - just can't recall what was said now.
 
No yapping about the trap door? The hologram theory? The chair passing through the desk? The lack of paramedics and uber rapid whisking away of the apparent body with extraordinary orchestration? Super fast reaction tear down of the scene within minutes; No autopsy, rapid cremation, fast issuance of death certificates?

Erika Kirk’s sketchy past and connection to Trump; funky bio, appearance on some fake reality dating show, Romania trafficking allegations, etc? Very careful about not messing up her heavy eye makeup while daubing away nonexistent tears? The super zoomed in morbid cam with all her kissing of his hands. Who does that? A shotgun mic with a hovering close up, not random but intentional?

And how about the obvious occult timing: new moon, eclipse, equinox, and other astrology?

You can dismiss all this as “unlikely” if that’s your position while focusing on magic bullet theories. Any real analysis has to take these other data points into account. It all looks carefully crafted.

But What’s the net result? An emotional loosh fest to radicalize the Christian right and create even more division? Lots of confusion and noise, obviously. You can do that by really offing CK or just faking it. A massive distraction. A huge increase in awareness of Kirk’s organization (next level marketing?) A new leader for this organization with a potential alteration of its message?

I know a fair number of evangelical types and, man, have they gone off the deep end Big Time! Kirk’s a heroic saintly martyr of epic proportions, Erika is the avenging lioness of Judah anointed by God! No one dares dispute this. Rise up my children! Holy crap!! I think that was a big part of the intent here and that is the real story. Muad Kirk!!

Meanwhile the generals are gathering in Quantico? WTF? (And no speculative thread on that yet?)
 
Quick rundown of some of the theories and their strengths and weaknesses as I see them:

Rifle shot to neck

Pros: audio signature of muzzle blast and bullet passing in vicinity of microphone, body reactions consistent with rifle shot hitting front of body, prone figure seen with rifle at location consistent with audio and apparent direction of the force of impact

Cons: .30-06 inconsistent with neck wound (possible counter: low-yield ammunition)

Rifle shot to body armor

Pros: neck wound consistent with deflection/fragmentation, some possible consistent reactions visible (e.g. potential bullet hole below left collar of Kirk's t-shirt, strange expansion of rear of t-shirt consistent with protective plate on his back)

Cons: Erika says he wasn't wearing a vest (possible counter: NDA or protecting reputation of a company Kirks were friendly with)

Gunshot from another location

Pros: might explain the anomalous neck wound

Cons: shots from other directions are inconsistent with reaction of body, neck wound doesn't show expected signs of exit wound (possible counter: anomalous ballistics), no other shot appears on audio recordings

Microphone explosion

Pros: could explain neck wound as exit wound and behavior of necklace and shirt

Cons: no sign of immediate damage to shirt or chest, lack of a cord/wire might make the wound on the opposite side of neck implausible, might not deliver enough force to body to explain the reactions we see (possible counter: even though unprecedented, we don't know what we don't know)
 
I know a fair number of evangelical types and, man, have they gone off the deep end Big Time! Kirk’s a heroic saintly martyr of epic proportions, Erika is the avenging lioness of Judah anointed by God! No one dares dispute this. Rise up my children! Holy crap!! I think that was a big part of the intent here and that is the real story.

If there was a larger agenda beyond getting rid of Kirk (assuming that was even a goal as opposed to a means to an end) I think the above fits pretty well, mainly because that's what's happening, at least in part.

Meanwhile the generals are gathering in Quantico? WTF? (And no speculative thread on that yet?)

Do we need one? Sounds like a group therapy session. At least for now.

At next week's unusual gathering of several hundred senior U.S. generals and admirals, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth will deliver his message of restoring the "warrior ethos" to the U.S. military and present new standards toward that goal, according to five U.S. officials.

Many of the senior military officers will come to the Marine base at Quantico, Virginia, from all over the United States and from around the world to hear Hegseth in an event that could last just 30 minutes, according to two officials.
 
Last edited:
The back of Charlie's shirt, on his left side, gives a big poof. The front of Charlie's shirt, on his left, side also gives a big poof with a weird vertical thrust. The wound on Charlie's neck is on his left side. It seems to me that these three points all line up on the same trajectory. It's my opinion that this shows the path of the bullet, of whatever make, and the rapid dissipation of kinetic energy.
 
Back
Top Bottom