Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history

[Revolucionar]

4D physics.

Why use a physical projectile then? They could have just burst his jugular from the inside with their 4d weapons and we'd be none the wiser.

 

[JEEP]

none the wiser.

We're none the wiser as it is. Nobody knows nuthin' and I expect it'll stay that way.

 

[Ruth]

Was Charlie Kirk cremated, and his ashes placed at First United Methodist Church Columbarium?

Why would they go to the trouble of embalming a person they intended to cremate? Huh.

Yes—according to public records and memorial listings, Charlie Kirk was cremated, and his ashes were placed at the First United Methodist Church Columbarium in Phoenix, Arizona.

 

[Revolucionar]

We're none the wiser as it is. Nobody knows nuthin' and I expect it'll stay that way.

You seem to be convinced.

 

[JEEP]

You seem to be convinced.

Hope springs eternal. And won't it be fine when hope becomes reality. I mean, who would have thought there'd be peace in Gaza now! The Trumpster made it so. Color me stunned.

 

[Ruth]

Another thought - who says it was a functional mic? Merely made to look like a functioning mic. And here's the kicker -

Did they make those pagers look functional too? I'm presuming they were functional otherwise they wouldn't have been worn and used for such a great length of time and I don't think it would take much explosive "shaped charge" to create the necessary conditions in order for the liner to become the projectile (like it normally does in a "shaped charge").

 

[JEEP]

otherwise they wouldn't have been worn and used for such a great length of time

How long was Charlie's mic on his body before it detonated? 20 minutes, 30 minutes? 45 minutes? And unless we get the absolute truth regarding whether or not it functioned as a mic that recorded as intended, there's no way to verify if it was for real or fake.

 

[Revolucionar]

Hope springs eternal. And won't it be fine when hope becomes reality. I mean, who would have thought there'd be peace in Gaza now! The Trumpster made it so. Color me stunned.

I'm sorry, I don't understand what you mean by this comment. Hope for what?

And the peace deal in Gaza is a sham. Trump wants to build Mar a Lago #2 over there.
It's tremendous seaside real estate, you know?

 

[Ruth]

Why use a physical projectile then? They could have just burst his jugular from the inside with their 4d weapons and we'd be none the wiser.

Because 3D have the technology, the ability, not only do the deed, but do it publicly and to cover it up?

 

[Voyageur]

I'm sorry, I don't understand what you mean by this comment. Hope for what?

That comes from a poem by Alexander Pope. It basically means there is always hope, we can always hope.

 

[Ruth]

How long was Charlie's mic on his body before it detonated? 20 minutes, 30 minutes? 45 minutes? And unless we get the absolute truth regarding whether or not it functioned as a mic that recorded as intended, there's no way to verify if it was for real or fake.

Actually I was talking about a similar event that occured in the Middle East, but with pagers. I was presuming that they were functional for a long period of time prior to being detonated. Something can still work AND explode too! (You'll find China has a similar problem with it's manufacturing, but it's definitely not intentional, and it's due to poor workmanship and construction.)

 

[Ricardo]

One can certainly hope that there´s sustained peace regarding Gaza but doesn´t seem likely , not if the 4th d STS plans are to wipe out "Palestinians" , plus however long the weapons are silent the greater the chance that the horror that´s been unleashed on Gaza will be even more exposed , not that it´s hasn´t but eh , likely for it to resume shortly i think.

 

[RedFox]

I don't buy the exploding mic theory either. I know the Cs said that it was the case, but that doesn't mean that the transmission wasn't corrupted for whatever reason.

If someone can provide an explanation for why the mic moved towards Charlie's neck instead of away from it, I'll entertain the possibility.

Already did:

Post in thread 'Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history'

Oct 3, 2025

I wanted to refresh my understanding of shaped charges. Turns out specific shaped charges will tend to move forwards, rather than backwards when fired. So this would explain the momentum in Charlies shirt moving forward.

Here's a basic rundown of how shaped charges work:

And here's a (cross section) simulation of a similar type, where most of the explosive force comes out the rear of the device.

And

As such, if something similar to the second type where included in his mic pack, the mic pack would be propelled forwards rather...

• RedFox

• 

And here's a (cross section) simulation of a similar type, where most of the explosive force comes out the rear of the device.

As such, if something similar to the second type where included in his mic pack, the mic pack would be propelled forwards rather than backwards. Whilst still firing a deadly projectile (not a bullet) through his neck.

 

[Revolucionar]

Because 3D have the technology, the ability, not only do the deed, but do it publicly and to cover it up?

I wasn't the one who suggested it was 4D technology. Do you have any examples of technology that causes recoil to invert direction?

That comes from a poem by Alexander Pope. It basically means there is always hope, we can always hope.

I don't see what that means in terms of the topic at hand. We were talking about the fact that the mic moved in the same direction as the projectile.

 

[Revolucionar]

Already did:

Post in thread 'Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history'

Oct 3, 2025

I wanted to refresh my understanding of shaped charges. Turns out specific shaped charges will tend to move forwards, rather than backwards when fired. So this would explain the momentum in Charlies shirt moving forward.

Here's a basic rundown of how shaped charges work:

And here's a (cross section) simulation of a similar type, where most of the explosive force comes out the rear of the device.

And

As such, if something similar to the second type where included in his mic pack, the mic pack would be propelled forwards rather...

• RedFox

• 

That doesn't explain it, IMO. F=m•a
If you had a projectile going out from one side and at a certain acceleration, you would need to have an equal force on the other end. Even if you're right that the whole mic would move with the projectile, you would need to have enormous acceleration of the air on the other end to match the m•a of both the projectile and the mic itself. It would blow up the shirt so much, I would expect it to be ripped to shreds.

Just think about the force that would be required for a small projectile to pierce a persons chests and come out clean on the other side of the neck. The same amount of force would have to be present in the opposite vector as well. Where is that force? I just don't see it.