Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history

[JEEP]

Close but no cigar. Gun or controller? Most likely controller as Laura has proposed:

The rifle sound was produced by a rifle that was connected to a remote firing system linked to the same controller that was used to set off the explosive that killed Charlie.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1976790129407582634

Certainly larger than a palm pistol, but that was ruled out several pages back. Kind of odd no real effort to conceal the device seems to have been made. Was a bit of panic involved due to mistiming of the rifle shot sound and the mic explosion? All those sound analyses being put out can be real psyop busters! Oopsie!

 

[JEEP]

Bank deposit records?

"Nobody knows nuthin' and I expect it'll stay that way" - if you get my drift. Take note of this post.

 

[JEEP]

Ian Carroll, Jimmy Dore - questions, questions - were they even trying to save his life based on absence of blood and so much more:

The rifle sound was meant to provide a distraction so that agents could remove incriminating evidence from the area around Charlie. - Laura

 

[Ruth]

Hopefully she spots the messages and takes them into account.

A few days ago I sent (to their tip line) Joe's X link and the gif someone else had done (I'm sorry I don't know who that was because I couldn't find the original post - it was the gif from Charlie's right and back) and asked them to play it with no sound, and just to LOOK!

I think I might send her another with 'how a shaped charge works'. People are being mislead by the sound of a rifle shot. Which when you think about it, makes sense and was (obviously) the smartest thing they did to distract in all this whole catastrophe. However, you can't synchronise sounds made by people, it must be devices. In fact, sound and action are TOO synchronised. They happen simultaneously.

 

[Brewer]

Just think about the force that would be required for a small projectile to pierce a persons chests and come out clean on the other side of the neck. The same amount of force would have to be present in the opposite vector as well. Where is that force? I just don't see it.

Doesn't take much. I use a .17HMR, little energy but devastating due to it's design. A one gram pellet with a plastic tip that dumps all it's energy over a short distance.

o demonstrate the power of chemical propellants, I've headshot deer with a .17HMR at 120 meters. It's a 4.5mm ballistic tipped pellet weighing a little over a gram propelled by about .6cc or one third gram of powder. I'm a novice, some can take out rabbits at 244 and 257 meters! Here's the cartridge with a .5cc powder scoop and a AAA battery for scale.

Not saying its this cartridge or something similar but the energy potential is there with off the shelf powders and ammo.

 

[Approaching Infinity]

Ian Carroll, Jimmy Dore - questions, questions - were they even trying to save his life based on absence of blood and so much more:

There was blood, and yes, some of them evidently were.

 

[Ruth]

Well, you can see the movement of the mic in the videos. Now add to that the projectile itself and imagine the amount of air and acceleration on the other end that would be required to match it. I don't see any of that movement to the right of the mic.

In a "shaped charge", the liner becomes the projectile.

 

[Brewer]

There was blood, and yes, some of them evidently were.

Trying to save his life? Perhaps they were removing and planting evidence.

 

[Approaching Infinity]

Trying to save his life? Perhaps they were removing and planting evidence.

Didn't say they weren't potentially doing that too. But there isn't any indication that they didn't do what they were supposed to do: stop the bleeding, transport him to a vehicle, administer CPR once en route, and take him to the hospital. I highly doubt his entire team was "in on it." And even if they were, they would still go through the motions of doing everything they're supposed to do.