Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history

[JEEP]

The Story of Charlie Kirk

[1:46]

 

[JEEP]

More music to my ears:

Mr Robinson

 

[Cosmos]

I have watched Candace last episode. Remember that Candace and probably very few consider the exploding “microphone“ theory as a serious possibility. We have a special possible insight here on the forum.

It is interesting to me that she is honing into the idea that “a, or the, shot“ probably rang out quite close to Kirk and that people on the ground supposedly heard 2 shots as well. Further, she is saying now that it is a fact that “the bullet“ didn’t shoot through Kirk and that “a bullet“ was recovered and/or seen still in his flesh at a specific point at the back of his neck.

If there was some kind of explosion “from a microphone“ that caused his neck injury, you would expect to hear “a shot“ pretty (if not very) close to Kirk, right? Is that what people heard and Candace is now honing into (without realizing it)? Further, the second shot probably came from the triggering/and shooting from a real gun? Could it be that this is what people saw, heard and experienced there but explain both things with a sound of one or two guns? And/or could it be that the sound of the real gun that didn’t cause the injury actually came from fairly close to Kirk?

I would imagine that the acoustics in and around Kirk were probably quite hard to pin down (other than justifiably saying that it was close by), because of the arena setup around Kirk while he was at the lowest point? A small explosion down there was probably echoing a lot, making it hard to say from where it came and everyone sort of heard it coming from a different (but close) direction “as a shot“?

And what are we to make of the supposed fact that a bullet was recovered and/or seen in Kirks body? Was it placed there after the fact, maybe by someone handling him right after he was killed? And/or was the explosion devise equipped with (an already shot and damaged) round as a decoy to get propelled during the explosion into his body? One thing seems to be sure though, the official explanation of the type of caliber and gun used from that distance, leaving the bullet stuck where it supposedly stuck in his neck, seems very unlikely. Candace also seems to believe now that such a caliber/gun couldn’t have caused it and that probably a smaller caliber/gun was used.

Candace also speculates with good grounds I would guess, that there seem to have been quite a number of agents and law enforcement on the ground right after the kill that programmed everyone there “with what they have just heard and seen“, by saying things like “there was one shot“ and so on. I think that it is likely that something like that can make many people question and/or forget what they actually heard and saw and go with that adopted memory of the agents.

So it seems to me that Candace is following her nose quite well, in the absence of the explosion theory being considered more carefully.

 

[Cosmos]

By the way, the idea of a small explosion causing Kirks injuries sounds pretty consistent to me with the fact that they immediately started to extensively “clean up“ the area after the fact: They very quickly started to remove the gras and even covered the area with new “plaster“ and stuff. My strong guess is that even small explosions of that kind probably cover the surrounding area and especially the ground with particles that could easily show up in laboratory tests as residues of explosives. I would guess that the quick removal of the gras around the area and covering it up with new plaster was probably because they wanted to get rid of explosive residues.

 

[Joe]

Remember that Candace and probably very few consider the exploding “microphone“ theory as a serious possibility. We have a special possible insight here on the forum.

Sort of. But at least for me, the exploding microphone was the obvious best option before we had any special insight. It's literally right there in front of people's faces.

 

[Liliea]

It may not mean much, who knows... but I think there are many interests at stake for everyone involved in this meeting.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1978501674160263242

 

[Fluffy]

To remember and keep close to our hearts that Charlie is someone’s son, borne from their bodies, loved and cared for as a child and an adult.

They look absolutely broken. I can only slightly begin to imagine their grief. I pray they didn’t see the footage of their beautiful boy’s gruesome murder.

Prayers for Mr and Mrs Kirk that they find some peace in their immense sorrow.

 

[hiker]

Regarding the above X, Jon Bray's analysis seems to indicate that the rectangular magnetic clip hit the neck and caused the wound. He then goes on to say that the clip falls out of the wound. So, I'm confused. Is he saying the clip created an entry wound, but then fell out of that wound because of the gushing blood?

He then goes on to say there were two wounds. He lost me.

If so, I think he's wrong. In the high-quality video that came out a couple weeks ago, you can see the clip stays attached during the whole event. It is still attached when the wound appears.

I guess what he meant by two wounds was that the main charge penetrated Charlie’s chest, and then the magnetic clip hit his neck, causing another wound. However, it appears that the two wounds were caused by the shaped charge going through the chest and exiting (or parts of it) through the neck.

and please let me interject that every analysis of what happened to Charlie that involves breaking down the vids of his death greatly enhances my sorrow for Charlie. That such a horrible attack was perpetrated on him while being completely unsuspecting of the team that did this to him. He knew those guys and felt secure that he had nothing to fear while sitting in that chair.

Yeah. I felt that especially the video included in Bray’s X post was rather graphic, going back and forth with the neck bleeding (without any ”blurring” of it as many of the other analysts have done), and with the poor choice of background music, I thought that it was in a way ”disrespectful", for lack of a better word.

When I included Bray’s full X write-up in my post, I hadn’t watched the video in its entirety, and when I did so while paying attention (after posting), I thought that it would be better just to put his written text only in it, and leave a link to the clip for those who wanted to see it. So, I removed the video before the end of the 10-minute editing time.

(A side note: I was wondering why the original version of my post (with the video) could be seen in your quotation of it, but then realized that you must have done the quoting before I finished the editing.)

Anyways, perhaps I overreacted with this, but felt that it was in some way unnecessary ”exploitation”. (Personally, although the article about Charlie (and Iryna) was written in a thoughtful and reverent way, it was enough to see a short clip of the uncensored incident on John Carter’s substack article.)

 

[Ruth]

Subjects involved in the Charlie Kirk shooting were searched on the internet in Washington DC days before the shooting. Then it appears the evidence of that was "scrubbed". Maybe they didn't expect anyone to look?

 

[Ruth]

And there's more internet searches! This time the specific hospital that they took Charlie Kirk to as well as the medical examiner and doctors. This time, the searches originate in Israel. I guess they're all going to start using VPNs from now on?

 

[axj]

There is a good chance that these are photoshopped images of Google Trends and that these searches never happened. Are there videos of people actually typing these search terms in Google Trends and getting these results?

It also does not make much sense for a lot of people to search for "Charlie Kirk Tylor Robinson" in advance since the two had no connection whatsoever.

 

[seek10]

There is a good chance that these are photoshopped images of Google Trends and that these searches never happened.

Quite possible. But, is that what happened? Given how Bibi came out so quickly (after CK's assassination) means these "leaders" are too anxious to coverup. In the process they are exposed themselves.

Are there videos of people actually typing these search terms in Google Trends and getting these results?

In this hugely complex operation of giving a message to 8 billion people with CK's public execution, it is quite possible that some perpetuators knows about the link. It is not a one man operation. They searched about it as a part of their "research" in June/July, they didn't inform google in advance to purge their search log as it raises more suspicion in advance about a thing that was not yet decided.

It also does not make much sense for a lot of people to search for "Charlie Kirk Tylor Robinson" in advance since the two had no connection whatsoever.

This one person (Baron Coleman) must have done dozens of searches, out of which he got positive results in this specific case. If Bibi hadn't came out, it would have been another tin hat conspiracy.

Now on wards, the perpetuators will use VPN and they will point the VPN to Iran or Russia or Venezuela or whomever they don't like, use that as a evidence. In the process, they will discredit that approach (social media search to specific location).

 

[axj]

There is a video of someone doing these searches live three weeks ago, so it is probably real:

The video is very low quality for some reason and the voice is not synchronized to the picture, but the searches appear to be within Google Trends. It could be faked too, but much more difficult to do than a photoshopped picture.

 

[Ricardo]

There is a video of someone doing these searches live three weeks ago, so it is probably real:

It also does not make much sense for a lot of people to search for "Charlie Kirk Tylor Robinson" in advance since the two had no connection whatsoever.

fwiw , my impression is that it´s so ( not fake ) , prior to the assassination the conspirators would of course do prep work for the event , though why leave public clues is somewhat puzzling , maybe chalk it up to wishful thinking perhaps.

 

[Natus Videre]

Q: (Niall) They've said in the past that a Batman movie that was released in 2012-ish, which had references to the Sandy Hook shooting in the movie, even though it came out beforehand, was an instance of the Cosmic Mind sending many clues ahead of time. With the Charlie Kirk shooting, there's a 1998 Hollywood movie called Snake Eyes that has loads of similarities with the Kirk assassination. Was this another instance of that?

A: Yes there are many such instances.

Charlie Kirk... Captain Kirk from Star Trek? If Charlie hadn't been assassinated, he could have turned into Captain Kirk!

(Joe) And also in the last session they said that extra protection had been activated or something for people furthering knowledge. So are we to assume that Charlie Kirk wasn't among those furthering knowledge because he wasn't protected?

A: He might have done so much more and that is part of the motivation for selecting him as a target.

Charlie's full name: Charles James Kirk.
Captain Kirk's full name: James Tiberius Kirk.

Here is a character analysis of Captain Kirk generated by Brave. The similarities are striking!

Captain James T. Kirk is a complex character whose leadership and personal journey are central to the Star Trek franchise. He embodies traditional American masculine ideals through his charisma, decisiveness, and willingness to take risks, traits that define his command style on the USS Enterprise. His leadership is not solely based on authority but on inspiring loyalty and respect by leading from the front, often placing himself in danger alongside his crew. This approach aligns with the ideal of the brave, front-line leader who shares the burdens of his team.

Kirk’s character is defined by a deep sense of sacrifice for the greater good, whether protecting the crew, safeguarding vulnerable civilizations, or upholding the interests of the United Federation of Planets. This selflessness resonates with the American ideal of duty and personal cost for the collective welfare. His masculinity is particularly notable within the futuristic context of Star Trek, where he navigates a diverse interstellar community while maintaining distinctly human, masculine qualities that prove effective across varied scenarios.

A significant evolution in Kirk’s character is evident in Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country, where he grapples with aging and retirement, marking a departure from his earlier image as a young, adventurous captain. His deep-seated animosity toward the Klingons, rooted in the death of his son in The Search for Spock, initially hinders his ability to accept peace with them. However, after being framed for the assassination of the Klingon leader Gorkon and imprisoned, Kirk undergoes profound emotional growth. He acknowledges his own prejudice, develops a begrudging respect for Gorkon, and ultimately becomes a full-throated advocate for peace, demonstrating a capacity for change and empathy.

Kirk’s psychological depth is explored in episodes like "The Enemy Within," where a transporter malfunction splits his personality into a gentle and a fierce half, symbolizing the internal struggle between compassion and aggression. The series suggests that true leadership requires the integration of both aspects—his "evil" side, when properly controlled and disciplined, is vital to his strength. This duality reflects a broader theme in Star Trek: the necessity of spiritedness and even violence to preserve freedom, a concept that challenges purely pacifist ideals.

Kirk’s character also exhibits a strong independent spirit, often defying orders when he believes it is necessary to do what is right. In Star Trek V: The Final Frontier, he resists the mystical manipulation of Sybok, asserting that pain and guilt are integral to identity and cannot be erased by magic or transcendence. His actions are guided by a subjective moral framework that overrides conventional rules, reflecting a deep internal sense of justice. This tendency, however, sometimes leads to conflict, as seen when he violates the Prime Directive in Star Trek Into Darkness, resulting in the loss of his command and a lesson in accountability.

Psychologically, Kirk is characterized as an extraverted type, highly attuned to his environment and driven by external stimuli, often acting on instinct and hunches rather than rigid logic. His dominant function appears to be extraverted feeling, allowing him to empathize with others and understand their motivations, which he uses strategically. His relationship with Spock, who embodies logic and restraint, serves as a crucial counterbalance, helping Kirk regulate his impulses and mature. Through these interactions, Kirk learns to integrate his shadow aspects, such as self-doubt and the temptation to manipulate logic for personal gain, leading to greater self-awareness and integrity.

Overall, Captain Kirk is a figure of enduring appeal, representing a blend of courage, moral conviction, emotional complexity, and the capacity for growth. His journey—from a rebellious young officer to a seasoned leader who embraces change and peace—cements his status as a quintessential hero in science fiction.