Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history

[mabar]

wiw , my impression is that it´s so ( not fake ) , prior to the assassination the conspirators would of course do prep work for the event , though why leave public clues is somewhat puzzling , maybe chalk it up to wishful thinking perhaps.

Fake or not reinforced the narrative of one or shooter or the shooter.

 

[Ricardo]

Fake or not reinforced the narrative of one or shooter or the shooter.

( you´re not being clear ) The web searches came from Washington DC and Tel Aviv iirc prior to the assassination , so no ?

 

[Ruth]

There is a good chance that these are photoshopped images of Google Trends and that these searches never happened. Are there videos of people actually typing these search terms in Google Trends and getting these results?

It also does not make much sense for a lot of people to search for "Charlie Kirk Tylor Robinson" in advance since the two had no connection whatsoever.

I believe there are, but they were 'wiped' when other people tried to do it. And as far as searching for these things 'in advance', it only makes sense if you are one of the conspirators and you were in the stage of planning the event. Why else would they do it?

 

[Ruth]

fwiw , my impression is that it´s so ( not fake ) , prior to the assassination the conspirators would of course do prep work for the event , though why leave public clues is somewhat puzzling , maybe chalk it up to wishful thinking perhaps.

I think it's because they thought no-one would look. However, they're wise to it now!

 

[Fluffy]

( you´re not being clear ) The web searches came from Washington DC and Tel Aviv iirc prior to the assassination , so no ?

I think mabar means because the searches implicate Charlie and the connection of Tyler as the shooter, it also takes the heat off his security detail being invoked in anyway.

 

[Ricardo]

I think mabar means because the searches implicate Charlie and the connection of Tyler as the shooter, it also takes the heat off his security detail being invoked in anyway.

OK , but since it´s prior to the event this is more information that points to a conspiracy not otherwise, if were not to be left out in public the prevailing information otherwise would be the "official narrative" (optimally) , so for now i remain on the opinion that this info was not meant for "release" , ie wishfull thinking. (imo)

 

[Mark7]

Google Trends shows a massive surge in searches for “Tyler Robinson Charlie Kirk” on July 14, 2025. Two months before the act.

Tyler Robinson was unknown before he killed Kirk, so just a few searches of his name alone would occur. Multiple searches occurring with his specific name, followed by Charlie Kirk's, before the shooting, would be astronomically unlikely, it seems. Google doesn't quantify exact numbers, but searches for his name were in the 100s, perhaps, maybe low 1000s? So massive improbabilities multiplied together create a very, very improbable event. Really amazing, maybe not so much if there is a computer burp of some sort behind it all.

 

[Fluffy]

OK , but since it´s prior to the event this is more information that points to a conspiracy not otherwise, if were not to be left out in public the prevailing information otherwise would be the "official narrative" (optimally) , so for now i remain on the opinion that this info was not meant for "release" , ie wishfull thinking. (imo)

Agreed, and it could be one of those necessary ‘paper trails’ that have to be left for those seeking the truth. I don’t think that it’s exclusive to 4DSTS that only they have yo leave their ‘signature’. The wishful thinking part is quite possibly that they HOPE no one goes looking.

Imagine having to try to cover your tracks when there are archeologists everywhere digging about, how stressful!

 

[Ricardo]

Agreed, and it could be one of those necessary ‘paper trails’ that have to be left for those seeking the truth. I don’t think that it’s exclusive to 4DSTS that only they have yo leave their ‘signature’. The wishful thinking part is quite possibly that they HOPE no one goes looking.

( fwiw / imo ) The leaving clues part is related to , in a wider sense , not to choice but to the fact that 3rd or 4th relate to consciousness and its relation to reality (all) , so 4th STS by their actions leave , if you will , imprints on reality that relate to an environment / FRV wherein will directs it as such , since sts/sto paths are "mostly" not chosen in 3rd this still happens but usually to a lesser degree .

( quotes in "mostly" because there´s quadrillions of other 3rd STO planets elsewhere according to transcripts)

 

[mabar]

( you´re not being clear ) The web searches came from Washington DC and Tel Aviv iirc prior to the assassination , so no ?

I think mabar means because the searches implicate Charlie and the connection of Tyler as the shooter, it also takes the heat off his security detail being invoked in anyway.

Is more that the searching is something that goes down the infinite rabbit hole of conspiracies. I believe more in what Joe posted below, and there are many levels of involvement that are not being disclosed.

Sort of. But at least for me, the exploding microphone was the obvious best option before we had any special insight. It's literally right there in front of people's faces.

 

[Voyageur]

Oh FFS. He's turned 'actor theorist'.

Right there, all of Gueynot's past work must be critically examined and not taken at face-value.

Laurent retracted his earlier comment:

https://www.unz.com/article/the-public-execution-of-charlie-kirk/

While Chris Martenson has, I believe, conclusively shown that Charlie Kirk was shot from a different building at Utah Valley University (the Sorenson Student Center) than the one where Tyler Robinson was allegedly positioned (the Losee Center)—also disproving, in my view, speculations of a fake death, which I wrongly defended in an earlier article—other researchers continue to accumulate evidence that, in the weeks preceding Kirk’s death, his pro-Israel backers were trying to blackmail and threaten him into abandoning his recent criticism of Israel.

Gueynot's new lean is to Martenson's "conclusively shown," which is not conclusive.