Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history

[Cosmos]

I think that's a rather odd bit of speculation without any evidence at all. Candace showed text messages between them where she was helping him with his romantic pursuit of Erica. Seems more likely that they had a strong bond of friendship.

Watch Candice’s memorial video to Charlie Kirk:

She describes her relationship with Kirk there and it was clearly not romantic.

I‘m aware of those videos, text messages and that they were friends and nothing more and the circumstances why they traveled together and such. I was just saying that after I watched some of the videos of the two interacting and knowing how close they were in a platonic way that I wouldn’t rule out that at least one of them could have had a bit more then platonic friendship feelings for the other in secret, possibly without the other one or even themselves truly recognizing it. But obviously, that’s just pure speculation on my part and it is more likely that they both just felt pure friendship for eachother as they both made clear as well.

 

[JEEP]

I wouldn’t rule out that at least one of them could have had a bit more then platonic friendship feelings for the other in secret

Sounds like When Harry Met Sally thinking:

In 1977, college graduates Harry Burns (Billy Crystal) and Sally Albright (Meg Ryan) share a contentious car ride from Chicago to New York, during which they argue about whether men and women can ever truly be strictly platonic friends. During the drive, Harry and Sally discuss their differing ideas about relationships; Sally disagrees with Harry's assertion that men and women cannot be friends as "the sex part gets in the way".

I believe that Candace more than adequately conveyed her love for Charlie as like a brother and that Charlie was seemingly captured by Erika makes any romantic thoughts about Candace nonexistent. But then, since I'm not a guy, can men have strictly pure feelings towards females they're thrown together with, even if they have no intention of acting or maybe truly acknowledging such feelings?

 

[aragorn]

I just had a peek on X through my 'stealth account' (I don't post, like or retweet anything, some dog and cat posts in the profile) and noticed several semi-prominent accounts promoting the idea that Candace, in one of her latest clips, is saying that Trump killed Charlie Kirk. This is of course completely untrue, and anyone with a brain who listens to that clip understands that this is not at all what she's saying. She's just implying that 'they', meaning the 'Zio-Neocon-Globalist-Deep State', killed him and that Trump is sadly doing nothing to get to the truth (probably because he is pressured/threatened etc.). This propaganda is not surprising, but I was surprised by some individuals who eagerly participated in this coortinated smear campaign, one of them, for instance, being Steven Crowder. This implies that even those who we haven't fully suspected to be on the 'Deep State' or Zionist payroll, are in fact just that...they've only been more stealthy, until now.

This could mean that something is about to drop, as the C's hinted.

 

[Fluffy]

I believe that Candace more than adequately conveyed her love for Charlie as like a brother and that Charlie was seemingly captured by Erika makes any romantic thoughts about Candace nonexistent. But then, since I'm not a guy, can men have strictly pure feelings towards females they're thrown together with, even if they have no intention of acting or maybe truly acknowledging such feelings?

Is it even relevant to suspect any kind of romantic inkling? What difference does it make if there was? I don’t see one.

For lots of us it’s hard to imagine a purely platonic friendship between males and females because we’ve never experienced intimacy that’s not sexual with the opposite sex, especially women, I have wanted to but the lines have always gotten blurred, by myself too, I’m not only pointing the finger at men.

Charlie was a man of high moral standard who had strong boundaries, Candace seems like an appropriate counterpart to that. May be both of them had zero baggage from childhood that would cause any kind of confusion when it comes to feelings for the opposite sex and seeking out a partner.

The thought crossed my mind months ago too, how can they be so close but not romantically interested in each other.

May be they were- in a past life.

 

[Beau]

Jimmy Dore is zeroing in on Charlie's security team

 

[SummerLite]

I just had a peek on X through my 'stealth account' (I don't post, like or retweet anything, some dog and cat posts in the profile) and noticed several semi-prominent accounts promoting the idea that Candace, in one of her latest clips, is saying that Trump killed Charlie Kirk. This is of course completely untrue, and anyone with a brain who listens to that clip understands that this is not at all what she's saying. She's just implying that 'they', meaning the 'Zio-Neocon-Globalist-Deep State', killed him and that Trump is sadly doing nothing to get to the truth (probably because he is pressured/threatened etc.). This propaganda is not surprising, but I was surprised by some individuals who eagerly participated in this coortinated smear campaign, one of them, for instance, being Steven Crowder. This implies that even those who we haven't fully suspected to be on the 'Deep State' or Zionist payroll, are in fact just that...they've only been more stealthy, until now.

This could mean that something is about to drop, as the C's hinted.

I just saw this clip as well... My first impression was, oh no Candace is working for the DS! What you say here is true about "trusted sources" and discernment is critical. If someone comes out with such statements about Trump then they are either working for the DS, have other self serving motives, or are misinformed. In some cases I suspect a narrative is being seeded which could help "the battle" against the DS by putting out false information that make Trump look weak and uniformed, and so the enemy believes they have the upper hand and are put off guard. That doesn't appear to be the case with Crowder.

Personally, I think Trump hasn't rolled over on Charlies death. He is a man that values loyalty, he sincerely cared about Charlie. There are reasons why things aren't in the open and it appears Trump does nothing. I suspect an intense investigation has been done and the perpetrators are known at this point but....it must remain hidden for now (maybe it will never come out).

Thats my take on it. See if you can spot the "agents".

 

[Ricardo]

I just saw this clip as well... My first impression was, oh no Candace is working for the DS! What you say here is true about "trusted sources" and discernment is critical. If someone comes out with such statements about Trump then they are either working for the DS, have other self serving motives, or are misinformed. In some cases I suspect a narrative is being seeded which could help "the battle" against the DS by putting out false information that make Trump look weak and uniformed, and so the enemy believes they have the upper hand and are put off guard. That doesn't appear to be the case with Crowder.

Personally, I think Trump hasn't rolled over on Charlies death. He is a man that values loyalty, he sincerely cared about Charlie. There are reasons why things aren't in the open and it appears Trump does nothing. I suspect an intense investigation has been done and the perpetrators are known at this point but....it must remain hidden for now (maybe it will never come out).

Thats my take on it. See if you can spot the "agents".

From recent- ish transcripts Camacho Trump is "under pressure" from the same group that killed CK so doubt at this point he is in any position to do anything about it even if he realizes whodunnit and cares about it . imo

 

[SummerLite]

From recent- ish transcripts Camacho Trump is "under pressure" from the same group that killed CK so doubt at this point he is in any position to do anything about it even if he realizes whodunnit and cares about it . imo

There must be this pressure, yes. Another element to consider. We have seen the Trump admin move slowly in many areas because of the strong opposition imbedded in the system. What can be accomplished takes time.

 

[SummerLite]

This implies that even those who we haven't fully suspected to be on the 'Deep State' or Zionist payroll, are in fact just that...they've only been more stealthy, until now.

I am really glad you pointed this out!!! Thanks!

 

[Fluffy]

From recent- ish transcripts Camacho Trump is "under pressure" from the same group that killed CK so doubt at this point he is in any position to do anything about it even if he realizes whodunnit and cares about it . imo

Oh he can do plenty but does he have the testicles, that’s the question, I hope he does. If he wants to be known in whatever remaining history we have as King Trump then here’s his opportunity, he needs a ballsy team of smart and fearless people by his side.

 

[Ricardo]

Internet sleuths analyzing Ck´s murder are calling to attention to his Chief of staff "Mikey McCoy" on his phone arriving at the event that day during and after CK´s murder , casually walking away not giving any notice at all to what is transpiring around him , not per se indicative of guilt, but considering the last session transcript it does validate the assertion i think ( warning video contains graphic images ) :

Session 27 September 2025 :
(...)
Q: (Joe) So TPUSA was infiltrated by this group?

A: Yes
(...) .

https://twitter.com/x/status/1981034386163376274