Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history

Ricardo said:
Who knows :D , stranger things are certainly afoot , for context Blue Kachina @ wikipedia.

Quote "The ninth and final sign of destruction is described by White Feather (via Waters) as, "You will hear of a dwelling-place in the heavens, above the earth, that shall fall with a great crash. It will appear as a blue star. Very soon after this, the ceremonies of my people will cease""This claim needs references to reliable sources. This idea of the Blue Star Kachina marking the end of all Hopi rituals is reflected in Waters' book, Book of the Hopi, in which he states, "The end of all Hopi ceremonialism will come when a kachina removes his mask during a dance in the plaza before uninitiated children." This absence of Hopi ceremonialism will coincide with the destruction of the fourth world. Waters suggested that World War III will begin and the United States will be ripped apart by war, leaving only the Hopis and their homeland intact. The war of the end of the world is described by Waters as "a spiritual conflict with material matters "
Click to expand...
Came across this on X , Regulus a blue star , visually 1 but 4 according to wiki , turning red and appearing in front the sphinx " there´ll a shift into a new knowledge (...) in April 2026 " (1 hour interview , time mark for quote @ ~27:30 )" Chris Bledsoe @ NewsNation 18 July 2025. Though no linear time so it seems to be STS shenanigans . fwiw

https://twitter.com/x/status/1984574042020384784
 
From Owens' show Why Isn't The Trump Family Asking Questions About Charlie Kirk? | Candace Ep 254, she homes on changes to Kirk's Wikipedia entry, and criticizes President Trump and Don Jr.

The Wikipedia entry was edited just two days after Kirk's murder to include "his pastor," Rob McCoy, father of Mike McCoy, as having been a co-founder of TPUSA Faith with Kirk, whereas, Owens points out, he did no such thing. This insertion of McCoy Sr., after the fact, as a "close advisor of Kirk" is dubious and reeks of an attempt, either by MCoy himself, or by others through him, to wrest control of Kirk's legacy and thus his organization.

Owens then said she went back to see if Trump had ever expressed doubt about the official story of Kirk's assassination, and found that he hasn't. She then brings up a curious item that speaks to how 'locked-down' the Kirk investigation is in officialdom: the NYT published a report last week saying that close Tulsi Gabbard advisor Joe Kent, the head of the National Counterterrorism Center, "examined FBI files in the last several weeks to investigate whether the man charged with assassinating Charlie Kirk had support from someone else, a foreign power or another entity"... which angered FBI Director Patel because he felt Gabbard was encroaching on 'his turf', and required White House meetings to 'paper over'. So, a 'ripple of disagreement' from the Trump admin, but otherwise they're 'all in' on the cover-up.

Mid-way through she claims Kirk's actual funeral was a Catholic mass, and that he's buried in the cemetery of a Catholic church. Why cover this up? Or, at least, not report on it? Because this gets to the heart of the 'judeo-christian' form American protestantism has been parasitized into becoming. And she comments, once again, that she doesn't understand how it is that so many people around Kirk are able to lie, in big and small ways, about his death, struggles and legacy. [They're PSYCHOS, Candace!! She'll get there one day...]

On Don Jr, Owens says he was so close to Kirk, he helped him build TPUSA. So she's disgusted to hear him lie, in discussion with Megyn Kelly, that "the investigation in Kirk's murder is going fine," because she knows that he knows otherwise.
 
I think it's fair to say that Charlie Kirk rose from inauspicious beginnings, to a prime role in sculpting contemporary conservative thought, and the moment he turned against Israel, he was murdered. Who's behind this? It's all so bloody obvious to us who have been following events since Sept 11th 2001. It's the same methodology every time. But it's TOO obvious for some of our contemporaries in society, including many people I know. I said on an earlier thread that it's getting painfully obvious now, and that there may be a "switcheroo" coming up to deflect culpability for these heinous crimes against humanity.

I mean, 1m Gazans are dead now. How would you feel if that was happening in your own country? I'd be apoplectic with fury, and I know you all would too. But conservatives and Neo-Liberals the world over don't feel it yet. They don't understand. Why is that? Are they cold-hearted? Are they ideologically-possessed by a kind of Judeo-Christian, "western" orthodoxy? Yes, they are. Despite the LBGTQ+ nonsense, I still have hopes for the left in the UK/US, and I maintain good relations with many people there. But the Tories and American conservatives still confound me. Is that "old time religion" still so powerful? It's not to me, but clearly I'm an outlier in my social circle. And this is where Nick Fuentes could prove useful. He's got great reach, and if he progresses in his work, he could turn so many conservatives to a more knowledgeable modern perspective, taking in data points from many nations. He has that potential. But so did Charlie Kirk, that's the problem.
 
Not sure they´re all psychos but "Mikey McCoy´s" joker (plastic) smile was really creepy in the TP show they did to "refute" Mrs. Owens expose of his nonchalant attitude immediately following CK´s murder, but the left/right differences may be more of a media construct in the US more than anything else at this point or getting there i hope , with 70% of population refuting the "official narrative" , and the police doing house calls over media posts , things are getting interesting for sure.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom