I’m trying to wrap my head around NAR and what it actually is, suffice it to say that my gut feel is it’s nothing good and rather insidious. It does indeed appear that Charlie’s organisation was infiltrated by these types, pastor Rob McCoy being one of them. Recommend reading Mel’s thread in full, Wiki links below to this new Evangelical type movement:
NAR, or whatever it has turned into, and in particular its top heads, tightly embedded in the current Administration, have been my primary suspects from the beginning. They would not be able to tolerate the shifting direction of the conservative movement.
A few days ago, Thomas Karat posted on his substack an overview of state/soup_agency-sponsored assassinations and terrorist attacks, going back to Gladio/stay-behind network always blaming various left-wing "extremists
” for its own doing. Tactics like false-flag attacks, usual vile foes, scapegoats “whom no one would miss” a.k.a. lone assassins, "unsolved" murder cases, cover-ups, instant false narratives and trials by the media; in other words, “attribution inversion”: look elsewhere please or you become a 'terrorist'. Governments reaching for authoritarian rule often followed. Just as nowadays, with
NATO's Cognitive Warfare and
Trump's NSPM-7. But hey, let's better focus on Epstein,
right?
Cold War “Strategy of Tension”: Right-Wing Terror Framed as Left-Wing
karat.substack.com
Is it actually so or not, it makes a lot of sense to me, much more than anything else, FWIW.