Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history

What could possibly be so big that Candace felt the need to go through government channels first? A government who she broadly does not trust, no less.
she will try to contact people who are willing to ferret about to see if she can get any inkling one way or the other like she does with tpusa for example. she is not colluding with the government. many low level employees may have bits of information.
she's not going through gov.channels for permission but info.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Candace hit the Pastors hard today, actually she brings in all these celebrities' (names will be familiar) and what their experiences have been. Things seem to circle back to the Calvary Church (oh, and more on the Bushes):

00:00 - Start.
01:19 - Psychological control, Britney Spears, and the Calvary Church
35:04 - Continuing the Charlie Kirk investigation.
50:08 - Comments.


She brought it back up on today's episode at the 37min mark:

Yes, she did. And makes mention of it again today.
 
I‘m keeping up with the show of Candace including her last one yesterday.

First, it should be noted that she seems pretty open and rightfully suspicious about high level negative infiltration and manipulation of mayor churches and similar conglomerates including the catholic church which is good to hear.

Secondly, it very much sounds like what she has been teasing about quite explosive revelations about something to do with the egyption planes could get really hot and dangerous. Now she said she might talk about it on Monday, or more like maybe next week some day, because she is being advised by government insiders that it would be more or less smarter that way and she is visibly trying to be careful about what she is saying at this point. She and/or people she is in contact with seem to be undecided what the ramifications could be for publishing something like that to the public. And she is saying in many ways she/they are still trying to understand it themselves. It could also be that she is not only trying to play it safe here but that she might be trying to achieve something by the way she has gone about it so far. And of course some government contacts might be trying to achieve something in the way they are discussing/advising Candace.
 
I think Candace is rightfully suspicious about quite a number of people that were on the crime scene and surrounding area (a number of them caught on camera). I think it is likely that there was a some sort of mossad team on the scene (possibly involving quite a number of people) who managed a number of parts of the operation including monitoring people and guiding people to go here or there of think this or that about what just happened. In her last video she brings up a number of potentially suspicious people including people strangely hiding behind and/or being in bushes and a guy directing fleeing people away of one such bush/man and another guy (who walked in with Kirk?) “strangely/innocently“ hanging around closely to someone speaking to the media about what he has just seen.
 
I’m trying to wrap my head around NAR and what it actually is, suffice it to say that my gut feel is it’s nothing good and rather insidious. It does indeed appear that Charlie’s organisation was infiltrated by these types, pastor Rob McCoy being one of them. Recommend reading Mel’s thread in full, Wiki links below to this new Evangelical type movement:

NAR, or whatever it has turned into, and in particular its top heads, tightly embedded in the current Administration, have been my primary suspects from the beginning. They would not be able to tolerate the shifting direction of the conservative movement.

A few days ago, Thomas Karat posted on his substack an overview of state/soup_agency-sponsored assassinations and terrorist attacks, going back to Gladio/stay-behind network always blaming various left-wing "extremists for its own doing. Tactics like false-flag attacks, usual vile foes, scapegoats “whom no one would miss” a.k.a. lone assassins, "unsolved" murder cases, cover-ups, instant false narratives and trials by the media; in other words, “attribution inversion”: look elsewhere please or you become a 'terrorist'. Governments reaching for authoritarian rule often followed. Just as nowadays, with NATO's Cognitive Warfare and Trump's NSPM-7. But hey, let's better focus on Epstein, right?


Is it actually so or not, it makes a lot of sense to me, much more than anything else, FWIW.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom