If Candace´s accounting of the planes SU-BTT/BND are accurate previous to the assassination , and which according to her had been following Miss Erika for a while , plus what is in the transcripts about the "Egyptians" then there´s no coincidences, the AXEL-10 presence and itinerary on 10th September just adds further confirmation on deepstate presence and coordination , i´d guess as surveillance and possibly drone command and/or some sort of central coordination (imo).She states that the US doesn’t export any nuclear weapons technology, but it does nuclear-adjacent ones: governments that have made deals and are allied with the US (apparently, Egypt trains with its military) could fly into the US, where their (government) planes would be fitted with the latest nuclear-adjacent equipment. This technology is manufactured by defense contractors, including smaller ones, for example, ”E3TeKGroup”, which produces aircraft protection systems, etc.
That could be a reason for the planes stopping at Minot Air Force (nuclear command) base to pick up the equipment, then going to Provo to have it installed at Duncan Aviation, which in turn is the largest privately owned business jet service provider in the world.
Long story short, she speculates that the planes being there could be a coincidence in the end regarding Charlie’s assassination, but there seems to be a ”twist” though; the founder and CEO of E3TekGroup is Erika Kirk’s mother, Lori Franztve.(....)
Good summary of the first video by @GlamHamRadio, @hiker , but did you watch her second one below that? Based on their flight data, there's strong indication of coordination between both the Egyptian planes and the 'Axel 10' US military one around Provo on the day of Kirk's assassination.
(Joe) Was the plane that took off after Charlie Kirk's assassination carrying members of the team that carried out the assassination?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) This was the plane that's being tracked, coming and going from Egypt to the US, yes?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) And Egypt... does that mean there were probably Israelis, or Israeli associated?
A: Yes
Anyway, had forgotten about it until @JEEP posted this with Ian Carroll.
JEEP said:
TPUSA still trying to defend their actions with imaginary responses not backed up by actual video while also denigrating people questioning it all.
So I'm watching for McCoy as Carroll shows, and the woman appears again - see next four photos, and then low and behold she seems to be hot on the heels of Mikey McCoy. Who she was, no idea. Perhaps she was just one of the crowd filming everyone pouring out - including Mikey, perhaps.
She is maybe 75 feet behind Mikey.



,) she appears to heads out toward the van, turns and starts filming (her filming is plain to see just as she is not filming what one might expect). At some point, too, McCoy must have passed her. And by the time they are loading Charlie into the van, she turns and the rest can be seen from Carroll's video adapted above, and the video and photo captures before in sequence. The fact that EVERYONE in these Comments are explicitly telling you NOT to meet TPUSA in person, speaks VOLUMES of how the general PUBLIC feels about them. NOBODY TRUSTS TPUSA. That ship sunk with Charlie Kirk.
This is odd , what do they stand to gain ? quite obvious even without access to the transcripts and what C´s have said on this, that it was a public execution, orchestrated and covered up by formal agencies , it appears like is this another wishful thinking moment (?) .The latest from Candace:
TPUSA stated that in the near future, on a live stream, they will be addressing the ”false” accusations that have been made against them (and others) regarding Charlie’s death. The live stream will happen in Phoenix at the TPUSA studio, and they invite Candace to join them.
If you go through the comments of this clip (same goes for the full length video), virtually all are advising Candace NOT to go to meet them on their home turf.
She would be at a disadvantage there, and in the worst-case scenario could be, for instance, ”poisoned” in some (latent) manner so that she wouldn't be able to continue her research. A virtual meeting is recommended instead and even with that, she should make sure that her computers won't be hacked.
This comment pretty much sums it up:
Given that he posted it so late in the day, people are pointing out that she would've likely been in bed and that it was a cowardly move. Also, why the insistence on her being there in person when she offered to livestream with them tomorrow? Are they just calling her bluff, or does someone have something planned? I don't like it at all. Before Neff posted this, Candace responded to his original statement saying she would go to the studio. She also said TPUSA wouldn't be so stupid to try anything. But still, why does she need to physically be there for this "debunking"?.The livestream we announced on the show Wednesday has been set.At 4 pm Eastern, 2 pm local time on Monday, December 15, a collection of Charlie's friends will respond to statements made by
@RealCandaceO, to set the record straight once and for all prior to the opening of AmericaFest.We’ll be live-streaming from Charlie’s Phoenix studio. Our offer from yesterday holds: If Candace wishes to join us in person in Phoenix, she is welcome to do so. She can let us know by the end of today.