Cloud Atlas

Here's the press conference with all the actors and directors. Some interesting insights about the movie adaption to the book (which seemed very scattered as the directors admitted) and the actors' experiences shooting the movie. Never mind the occasional dumb questions by some reporters: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnG5zbg8NoM
 
SpiralOut and I watched a few different interviews on the directors Lana and Andy Wachowski and Tom Tykwer before going to see Cloud Atlas. I suggest watching some interviews on Youtube before going to see it. It helped us in understanding some of the deeper messages in the movie and the intentions behind the making of the film. I am very inspired by Lana Wachowski! Lana Wachowski gave a speech at the Human Rights Campaign in San Francisco on Oct 20, 2012, It is a very powerful speech. The movie is at times all over the place and hard to follow and I could not possibly get all the connections and messages seeing it only once. We are planning to go see it again to see what else we can pick up on from the film.

I actually think the movie was much better than the book. I still left the theatre feeling like they had grasped for more than they could actually reach, but I did enjoy it and thought it was well done. I just think the base material itself (the book) was lacking and that the idea of soul groups and reincarnated lives together could have, perhaps, been told in a much more impactful, clear, way. So, while I enjoyed it, I still felt that there was a lot missing - then again, I shouldn't expect so much from a movie!

I agree, I also left the theatre feeling like, "they had grasped for more than they could reach," but this encouraged SpiralOut and I to further contemplate and discuss topics like reincarnation, connection to others, faith etc. Although it was a bit vague it did get us thinking. The way they presented the topic of reincarnation and the ripple affect that your actions have on others and the future was their way (one way) of presenting such topics. It is nice to see a film that is touching on deeper issues and the 'inexplicable.' I liked that the film left me in contemplation and in a place to then look at my knowledge and understanding around the topics presented in the film. I realized there is so much I want to learn about and understand and all the that I don't know.
 
These are very encouraging reviews of the film. I am glad so many of you enjoyed it. It seems the directors have made a good attempt at expanding the themes of the book. That is unusual isn't it? So often I find that the film does not come up to the quality of the original book, especially if I have read it first. Has anyone found any comments by the author? I wonder if he approved. Often they are upset or at the very least bemused by the changes made to their baby. I won't get chance to see the film at the cinema but I will certainly look out for the DVD release now it has earned such a positive response here.
 
panca kanga said:
These are very encouraging reviews of the film. I am glad so many of you enjoyed it. It seems the directors have made a good attempt at expanding the themes of the book. That is unusual isn't it? So often I find that the film does not come up to the quality of the original book, especially if I have read it first. Has anyone found any comments by the author? I wonder if he approved. Often they are upset or at the very least bemused by the changes made to their baby. I won't get chance to see the film at the cinema but I will certainly look out for the DVD release now it has earned such a positive response here.

According to what I've read, the author, David Mitchell, did approve, and according to the Wachowskis, "loved" the film. As for films better than the books, I think Stanley Kubrick had a knack for doing that as well.
 
I got a chance to see this today and was really impressed! I haven't read the book, but I actually didn't find it that difficult to follow (but I'm pretty sure I only caught about half of what was said in that future-patois dialect). Since I'd been primed a bit by what I'd read about the film I decided before going in that I wasn't going to attempt an intellectual understanding of the film while watching it, but rather just let the images and stories settle in as they were. I think this may be part of the reason it didn't seem hard to follow - I wasn't struggling to "get it" the whole time.

And the three hours actually seemed to fly by. I didn't check my watch once :)
 
dugdeep said:
I got a chance to see this today and was really impressed! I haven't read the book.

And the three hours actually seemed to fly by.
I watched it couple of days back. Though I followed the 6 story lines, trying to relate the characters, still felt that I missed some portions. Particularly the portions where choices in one life time reflects in other life times. Scenes moved too fast and Lot was covered in short 3 hours. I may watch it when DVD comes and watch it slowly. Never got bored with the movie and 3 hours flew pretty fast.
 
I had the opportunity to see the movie last night with a friend. I was not disappointed in the least, and I felt having read the book first really helped me keep up with the fast pace plots and transitions (which cinematically wove the stories together much more tightly than the book). The friend I went with quipped he wished the far future had subtitles in it, since it was harder to follow on top of the other stuff.
 
I just got back from seeing this film and was really impressed with it. I thought the way the story lines were woven together was excellent and didn't find it hard to follow at all (except a bit with some of the english dialects) nor long or boring (it actually was impressive, I thought, that they packed so much into the amount of time it had).

I got really emotional towards the end and was tearing up for a while seeing people stand up for the truth and really deeply caring for others, and also seeing those connections and caring traveling through time and separate lives. It was really powerful to me.

I also really enjoyed seeing the actors play different characters and the gender swapping--I think my favorite was Hugo Weaving dressed up as the iron-fisted nurse at the psych ward.

The Wachowskis are certainly some talented film makers, in my opinion.
 
I think reception of Cloud Atlas is determined by "who you are and what you see."

I delighted in how the film deftly jumped from one "universe" to another, one genre to another, and all linked together in ways both seen and unseen, - my intellect adored a challenge like that. I wouldn't say I caught ALL the connections there were to catch, I wouldn't say I processed the film to the highest degree, but it was pure joy to attempt it, and in that respect the experience of watching Cloud Atlas reflected how (I presume) I ought to approach Life. It is only fun when you are challenged! For instance, I loved it when I was trying hard to grasp what the characters were saying in their future lingo, with only fragmentary success.

And every genre, every trick in film and storytelling, smashed together in some kind of Big Crunch that allows us to glimpse the infinite multiplicity of the Universe...

Just as one might understand the blueprint of nature when watching Animal Planet, so does one see the blueprint of Life, the Universe, and Everything when watching Cloud Atlas. It was a beautiful backdrop of multiple universes upon which is enacted the theological reality of "There is no God, everything just IS!" Yet, this blueprint is necessarily given incomplete treatment: while reincarnation and interconnectedness are strongly implied, higher densities - and possible "universes" occupied by those higher densities - are absent.

The line "Our lives are not our own" I interpreted thusly: when we see how each character's soul rerun is perceived by it to be "all there is," we contemplate how each rerun might be used to serve a higher purpose that transcends the lower natural order of reincarnation - if only the person in question cast aside his subjective circumstances in service of that higher purpose. And I am reminded of Ark writing something along the lines of being a vessel through which the Universe acts. We can dedicate our vessel to the Truth if we wish...

Could the film have been "more" than what it already is? I think perhaps, if the portrayed interconnectedness was taken to the order of magnitude of the Wave. Personal triumphs, overcoming the Predator, speaking the Truth as a revolutionary act, mythicization of Ancient Technology, transfer of people to another planet (an "Ark" of sorts) - all these are present. But what if actions taken during all those lives accomplished some Great Task that "bust the systems" of each and every one of those lives, past, present and future? (For example, what if the Cloud Atlas Sextet was involved in the TDARM process...what if the characters became conscious of their iterations...) Still, I love this film as it is. It is like a gift to third density.

My present state of knowledge has allowed me to receive Cloud Atlas as something of a C influence. Whether this was wise I do not know. I might decide to watch it again, and who knows what I'll see then?

The Wachowski films concerning Truth appeal to that part of me whose conscience is clear and questioning as a child's.

And a quote I like?[quote author=Sonmi-451]Truth is singular; its versions are mistruths.[/quote]
 
Muxel, i could just sign myself under your post.
Just came back from cinema, moving to tears and it lasts. Definitely will watch again.
 
hello i actually want to see the movie Cloud Atlas but itsnot being shown in the UK :( does anyone know why this is?
 
K-JACK said:
hello i actually want to see the movie Cloud Atlas but itsnot being shown in the UK :( does anyone know why this is?

Hi K-JACK,

I'm not sure exactly why, but I assume it has to do with creating hype and all other sort of marketing reasons.

But according to IMDB, Cloud Atlas should be released in the UK on February 22, 2013.

_http://www.imdb.com/news/ni35770986/
 
I also watched the movie some days back and really enjoyed it. Especially the future "slang" did make me really giggle. Also it is a movie I like to watch again, so I'm looking forward for the DVD.
 
I have to wait until december 20th, when it finally gets to my country :(, but i'm excited just reading the reviews here because i was intrigued by this film from the moment i saw the trailer. Looking forward to it for sure :D
 
I really liked the movie and saw it twice and plan to get the dvd as I think it is something you can get a little more out of each time. I enjoyed it more the second time. I can't say I got it all but that doesn't matter.
 
Back
Top Bottom