Color revolutions - listing of regime change attemps

Aeneas

Ambassador
Ambassador
FOTCM Member
I thought it might be good to have one thread where all the various color revolutions including the Arab Springs are put together. And their modus operandi. We already have a couple of threads devoted to the NGO enablers such as SOHR and The White Helmets.

It would be good for clarity to have a year and country in bold for these, so it is easy to find. There are already a lot of articles on Sott about these events that we can choose from.

Here are two good videos that details the process well, one is from Engdahl and the other from Chinese TV (well worth watching despite length of 25 min.)

Color revolutions
Uploaded on 12 Jul 2009

Techniques of US covert warfare.

https://youtu.be/5KWKw1WnziY

OCCUPY HONG KONG, A COLOR REVOLUTION IN CHINA !
Published on 19 Dec 2014

EODE-TV with False Flag/ 2014 12 19/

“The False Flag” is a video report from Chineese Television, on color revolutions in Eastern Europe, the so-called “Arab Spring” and the “Umbrella Revolution” with “Occupy Central” in Hong-Kong” since september 2014.

THE SO-CALLED “UMBRELLA REVOLUTION”

Protests in Hong Kong began in September 2014, after the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress (NPCSC) of the People's Republic of China announced its decision on proposed reforms to the Hong Kong electoral system. In its decision, the NPCSC said that civil nominations, whereby a candidate could run for election to the Hong Kong Legislative Council if he or she received signed endorsement of 1% of the registered voters, would be disallowed. The decision stated that a 1200-member nominating committee, the composition of which remains subject to a second round of consultation, would elect two to three electoral candidates with more than half of the votes before the general public could vote on them. This was the pretext for a trial of “color revolution” in Hong-Kong.

Demonstrations began outside the Hong Kong Government headquarters, and members of the what became called the “Umbrella Movement” occupied several major city intersections. The Hong Kong Federation of Students and Scholarism began protesting outside the government headquarters on 22 September 2014 against the NPCSC's decision. On the evening of 26 September, several hundred demonstrators led by Joshua Wong, a pro-american activist, breached a security barrier and entered the forecourt of the Central Government Complex (nicknamed "Civic Square"), which was once a public space that has been barred from public entry since July 2014. Officers cordoned off protesters within the courtyard and restricted their movement overnight, eventually removing them by force the next day.

On 28 September, the “Occupy Central” with “Love and Peace movement” (sic) announced that they would begin their civil disobedience campaign immediately. Protesters blocked both east–west arterial routes in northern Hong Kong Island near Admiralty. Police tactics (including the use of tear gas) and attacks on protesters by opponents that included triad members, triggered more citizens to join the protests, occupying Causeway Bay and Mong Kok. The number of protesters peaked at more than 100,000. The government called for an end to the protests by setting a 'deadline' of 6 October, but this was ignored by protesters, although they allowed government workers to enter offices that had previously been blocked.

The state-run Chinese media claimed repeatedly that the West had played an "instigating" role in the protests, and that "more people in Hong Kong are supporting the anti-Occupy Central movement," and warned of "deaths and injuries and other grave consequences."


https://youtu.be/8PrIG4A6lj0
 
I remember having read an excellent article teaching about the concept of color revolution; it is explaining how a "color revolution" is actually a scientific concept denouncing something being rather like some "tool from the empire", exactly like terrorism.

I am writing this because before reading about it, I was attached to the idea of color revolution being a term invented recently to describe a new phenomenon, kind of a term which had been best suiting the general need for labelling these events.

But, it appeared to me that a "color revolution" can be brought back to some kind of psyop, really some kind of psychopathological tool for achieving a specific goal.

Maybe it can be related to a shock, as described by Naomi Klein in "The shock doctrine".

What I am trying to get is that a "color revolution" might as well be switched with "intentional shock" without being even one inch astray objectively speaking; because the term is very soft, contains the "color" word, as it appeared in Maghreb, it might be misleading in its sense.
 
На мой взгляд явления последнего времени, которые называют "цветными революциями", вполне похожи на гораздо более ранние события, например Иран-1953 год или Чили-1973 год. Общее у всех этих революций то, что они происходят при поддержке, а зачастую и под непосредственным руководством, западных финансово-политических сил. Вместе с тем, опять же на мой взгляд, есть серьезные отличия. Во первых новейшие события происходят под маскировкой защиты прав человека, более ранние революции не имели подобного камуфляжа. Во вторых, если ранее революции имели достаточно прозрачные финансово-коммерческие цели международных корпораций, то последние события в Сирии и Украине показывают превалирование политики над финансами, даже с прямым вредом последнему. К чему эта трансформация может привести мир?


Translation
In my opinion the phenomenon of recent times, which are called "color revolutions", is quite similar to much earlier events, such as Iran in 1953 or Chile in 1973. The total of all these revolutions is that they occur with the support and often under the direct leadership of the Western financial-political forces. However, again in my opinion, there are serious differences. First of latest events occur under the disguise of human rights protection, earlier revolutions did not have similar camouflage. Second, if earlier the revolution had a fairly transparent financial and commercial goals of international corporations, the recent events in Syria and Ukraine show the predominance of politics over Finance, even with a direct injury of the latter. What this transformation may lead the world?
 
There is some information on Wikipedia which even if not sufficient can give ideas where to look:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colour_revolution said:
Colour revolution (sometimes called the coloured revolution) or color revolution is a term that was widely used by worldwide media[1] to describe various related movements that developed in several societies in the former Soviet Union and the Balkans during the early 2000s. The term has also been applied to a number of revolutions elsewhere, including in the Middle East. Some observers (such as Justin Raimondo and Michael Lind) have called the events a revolutionary wave, the origins of which can be traced back to the 1986 People Power Revolution (also known as the "Yellow Revolution") in the Philippines.

Participants in the colour revolutions have mostly used nonviolent resistance, also called civil resistance. Such methods as demonstrations, strikes and interventions have been intended protest against governments seen as corrupt and/or authoritarian, and to advocate democracy; and they have also created strong pressure for change. These movements generally adopted a specific colour or flower as their symbol. The colour revolutions are notable for the important role of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and particularly student activists in organising creative non-violent resistance.

... Yugoslavia's Bulldozer Revolution (2000)... Georgia's Rose Revolution (2003) .... Ukraine's Orange Revolution (2004). In most but not all cases, massive street protests followed disputed elections, or requests for fair elections, and led to the resignation or overthrow of leaders considered by their opponents to be authoritarian. Some events have been called "color revolutions" but are different from the above cases in certain basic characteristics. Examples include Lebanon's Cedar Revolution (2005); and Kuwait's Blue Revolution (2005).
And what about the Arab spring, although there was no color?

Tetiana Montyan in the video on https://www.sott.net/article/329156-Ukrainian-situation-seen-from-the-inside-an-interview-with-Tetiana-Montyan mentions it has also been tried recently in Armenia and Kazakstan, but without success. I'm sure there are article's on Sott about these instances.
 
Palinurus mentions the role of George Soros in these color revolutions and I think one could almost start a single thread devoted just to George Soros and his crimes against humanity. But that will have to wait.
Thorbiorn asks about the Arab Spring and I think they also should be included here as they follow the same modus operandi about 'demands' for human rights, freedom and democracy with heavy Western influence.
It would be good to transcribe the Chinese video mentioned in the initial post as it describes the 'formula' of a color revolution well. I will get to that or at the least the 12 steps of color revolution technology, which is what is interesting.

Below is a the beginning list of color revolutions with country and year, taken into account what others have written so far. Each 'revolution' can then be fleshed out later with details and as Thorbiorn mentions, then there are lots of articles on Sott about at least some of these these. I think it is important to see just how they operate, their backers, their ways of sometimes even using the same posters as was mentioned in connection with the Ukrainian 'revolution'. Anyway here is a starter:

1974 Portugal: The Carnation revolution
1986 Philippines: The Yellow revolution
2000 Serbia: The Bulldozer revolution
2003 Georgia: The Rose revolution
2004 Ukraine: The Orange revolution
2005 Kyrgyzstan: The Tulip revolution
2005 Lebanon: The Cedar revolution
2005 Kuwait: The Blue revolution
2006 Nepal: The Democracy movement aka the Jana Andolan II movement (not sure if it qualifies yet, but a superficial look appears to qualify it).
2007 Burma: The Saffran revolution
2008 Tunesia: The Jasmine revolution aka The Tunesien revolution
2008 Tibet: The Crimson revolution
2009 Iran: The Green revolution
2009 Thailand: The Redshirt revolution
2011 Egypt: The January 25 revolution aka The Egyptian revolution
2011 Kazakhstan: Attempt of incitement for mass riots. Failed.
2011 Algeria: Attempt failed to gain momentum and thus no color
2013 Ukraine: The Maidan revolution
2014 Hong kong: The Umbrella revolution aka Occupy Hong kong
2015 Armenia: Failed attempt
2015 Macedonia: Attempt still in progress

Edit: Added Kazakhstan.
 
In the initial post, I linked to a Chinese video of how color revolutions functions:
Aeneas said:
Here are two good videos that details the process well, one is from Engdahl and the other from Chinese TV (well worth watching despite length of 25 min.)
>Snip<

OCCUPY HONG KONG, A COLOR REVOLUTION IN CHINA !
Published on 19 Dec 2014

EODE-TV with False Flag/ 2014 12 19/

“The False Flag” is a video report from Chineese Television, on color revolutions in Eastern Europe, the so-called “Arab Spring” and the “Umbrella Revolution” with “Occupy Central” in Hong-Kong” since september 2014.

THE SO-CALLED “UMBRELLA REVOLUTION”

Protests in Hong Kong began in September 2014, after the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress (NPCSC) of the People's Republic of China announced its decision on proposed reforms to the Hong Kong electoral system. In its decision, the NPCSC said that civil nominations, whereby a candidate could run for election to the Hong Kong Legislative Council if he or she received signed endorsement of 1% of the registered voters, would be disallowed. The decision stated that a 1200-member nominating committee, the composition of which remains subject to a second round of consultation, would elect two to three electoral candidates with more than half of the votes before the general public could vote on them. This was the pretext for a trial of “color revolution” in Hong-Kong.

Demonstrations began outside the Hong Kong Government headquarters, and members of the what became called the “Umbrella Movement” occupied several major city intersections. The Hong Kong Federation of Students and Scholarism began protesting outside the government headquarters on 22 September 2014 against the NPCSC's decision. On the evening of 26 September, several hundred demonstrators led by Joshua Wong, a pro-american activist, breached a security barrier and entered the forecourt of the Central Government Complex (nicknamed "Civic Square"), which was once a public space that has been barred from public entry since July 2014. Officers cordoned off protesters within the courtyard and restricted their movement overnight, eventually removing them by force the next day.

On 28 September, the “Occupy Central” with “Love and Peace movement” (sic) announced that they would begin their civil disobedience campaign immediately. Protesters blocked both east–west arterial routes in northern Hong Kong Island near Admiralty. Police tactics (including the use of tear gas) and attacks on protesters by opponents that included triad members, triggered more citizens to join the protests, occupying Causeway Bay and Mong Kok. The number of protesters peaked at more than 100,000. The government called for an end to the protests by setting a 'deadline' of 6 October, but this was ignored by protesters, although they allowed government workers to enter offices that had previously been blocked.

The state-run Chinese media claimed repeatedly that the West had played an "instigating" role in the protests, and that "more people in Hong Kong are supporting the anti-Occupy Central movement," and warned of "deaths and injuries and other grave consequences."


https://youtu.be/8PrIG4A6lj0
I think the 12 steps described in the video are quite insightful, so I have below transcribed the subtitles for the first part of the video outlining the 12 steps.
Colour Revolutions
Pastor Leung analyzes the mode of Color Revolutions:
[list type=decimal]
[*]Dispatch CIA, MI6 and other intelligence officers as students, tourists, volunteers, businessmen, reporters to the target country
[*]Set up Non Governmental Organizations (NGO’s) under the guise of humanitarianism to fight for “democracy” and “human rights” in order to attract advocates of freedom and ideals
[*]Attract local traitors, especially academics, politicians, reporters, soldiers etc. through bribery or threaten those who have some stain in their life
[*]If the target country has unions, bribe them
[*]Pick a catchy theme or color for the revolution. Examples include the Praque spring (1968), Velvet Revolution (Eastern Europe, 1989), Rose Revolution (Georgia, 2003), Cedar Revolution (Lebanon, 2005), Orange Revolution (Ukraine 2004), Green Revolution (Iran), Jasmine Revolution, Arab Spring and even Hong Kongs Umbrella Revolution
[*]Start protests for whatever reasons to kick off the revolution. It could be human rights, democracy, government corruption or electoral fraud. Evidence isn’t necessary; an excuse will do.
[*]Write protest signs and banners in English to let Americans see and get Americans politicians and civilians involved
[*]Let those corrupted politicians, intellectuals and union leaders join the protests and call upon all people with grievances to join
[*]The US and European mainstream media help by continuously emphasizing that the revolution is caused by injustice and thereby gaining the support of the majority
[*]When the whole world, is watching stage a false-flag action. The target government will soon be destabilized and lose support among its people
[*]Add in violent agent provocateurs to provoke the police to use force. This will cause the target government to lose the support of other countries and become “delegitimized” by the international community
[*]Send politicians to the US, EU, the UN to petition so that the target government will face the threat of economic sanctions, no-fly zones and even airstrikes and an armed rebel uprising

[/list]
If the above 12 steps do not work, the US will then find an excuse to intervene militarily and overthrow the target government by force. In fact these 12 step have proved to be very effective.

In 2007, Wesley Kanne Clark, a retired US army four-star general and former NATO supreme allied commander mentioned in a speech: Shortly after the 9-11 incident in 2001, the Department of Defense issued a directive about attacking and overthrowing seven countries including Iraq, Lebanon, Syria, Somalia, Sudan and Iran within five years. Although the plan wasn’t completed in five years, after more than a dozen years, the US applied these 12 steps in the Arab Spring and the war against terrorism for more than a decade. Among these seven countries, some have been overthrown, some mired in a civil war, and some on the edge of collapse.
Therefore it is not by spontaneous civil movements that countries are overthrown. On the contrary, the revolts are carefully planned and plotted. In fact, overthrowing a country by means of civil unrest is far cheaper than sending troops to attack and destroy it. That’s why the US keeps applying these 12 steps against countries it deems as enemies.

I think the above would make a good sott article almost by itself. Knowing the modus operandum in detail is important to forestall attempts at regime change. Forewarned is forearmed.
 
Latest manifestation of Soros playbook?

"Defeated Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton is not about to «go quietly into that good night». On the morning after her surprising and unanticipated defeat at the hands of Republican Party upstart Donald Trump, Mrs. Clinton and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, entered the ball room of the art-deco New Yorker hotel in midtown Manhattan and were both adorned in purple attire. The press immediately noticed the color and asked what it represented. Clinton spokespeople claimed it was to represent the coming together of Democratic «Blue America» and Republican «Red America» into a united purple blend. This statement was a complete ruse as is known by citizens of countries targeted in the past by the vile political operations of international hedge fund tycoon George Soros.

The Clintons, who both have received millions of dollars in campaign contributions and Clinton Foundation donations from Soros, were, in fact, helping to launch Soros’s «Purple Revolution» in America. The Purple Revolution will resist all efforts by the Trump administration to push back against the globalist policies of the Clintons and soon-to-be ex-President Barack Obama. The Purple Revolution will also seek to make the Trump administration a short one through Soros-style street protests and political disruption."

Complete article;
_http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-11/clintons-and-soros-launch-americas-purple-revolution
 
Cambodia is perhaps the most recent country where the US has tried for regime change using the textbook of color revolutions. It didn't work out as the elections was won by the ruling party. Here is a good article that shows how the US and the West has been active in trying to undermine the elected government of Cambodia. West-is-fuming-as-US-meddling-in-Cambodian-elections-is-ruined


Joseph Thomas
New Eastern Outlook
Tue, 31 Jul 2018 00:00 UTC


It would be unthinkable for an American opposition party run openly out of Moscow to compete in American elections. It would be even more unthinkable for the Russian government to declare US elections illegitimate for disallowing a Moscow-backed party from running in American elections.

Yet this is precisely what the US and the European Union have attempted to do in the wake of Cambodia's recent elections regarding an opposition party created by Washington and whose leadership calls Washington a second home.

US-EU Seek to Undermine Cambodian Election Results

The BBC in their article, "Cambodia election: Ruling party claims landslide in vote with no main opposition," would claim:
Critics have called the vote a sham as the Cambodia National Rescue Party (CNRP), which narrowly lost the last election, has been dissolved.
The US said the poll was "flawed".

"We are profoundly disappointed in the government's choice to disenfranchise millions of voters, who are rightly proud of their country's development over the past 25 years," a statement from the White House said.

The US will consider placing visa restrictions on more government officials, it added. The EU has said it is considering economic sanctions.
However, the BBC never explains why the Cambodia National Rescue Party (CNRP) was dissolved.

Had it, Washington and Brussels' statements would have been immediately rendered hypocritical and Cambodia's decision to dissolve CNRP more than warranted. This is because CNRP is openly run out of Washington, with US support, for the expressed aim of undermining and eventually overthrowing the current Cambodian government.

Cambodia's Opposition is Run From Washington

Kem Sokha who had led CNRP until its dissolution had traveled to Washington annually since as early as 1993 to seek support from the US. He also repeatedly announced receiving direct US support, as well as plans for subverting the Cambodian government with US backing.

The Phnom Penh Post in its article, "Kem Sokha video producer closes Phnom Penh office in fear," would go over the many admissions made by Kem Sokha:
Sokha says he has visited the US at the government's request every year since 1993 to learn about the "democratisation process"and that "they decided" he should step aside from politics to create change in Cambodia.

"They said if we want to change the leadership, we cannot fight the top. Before changing the top level, we need to uproot the lower one. We need to change the lower level first. It is a political strategy in a democratic country," he said.​
Regarding US assistance, Kem Sokha would reveal:
"And, the USA that has assisted me, they asked me to take the model from Yugoslavia, Serbia, where they can changed the dictator Slobodan Milosevic," he continues, referring to the former Serbian and Yugoslavian leader who resigned amid popular protests following disputed elections, and died while on trial for war crimes.

"You know Milosevic had a huge numbers of tanks. But they changed things by using this strategy, and they take this experience for me to implement in Cambodia. But no one knew about this."

"However, since we are now reaching at this stage, today I must tell you about this strategy. We will have more to continue and we will succeed."​
Kem Sokha would elaborate even further, claiming:
"I do not do anything at my own will. Their experts, professors at universities in Washington, DC, Montreal, Canada, hired by the Americans in order to advise me on the strategy to change the dictator leader in Cambodia."​
Kem Sokha's daughter, Kem Monovithya, has also openly worked with the US to seek the overthrow of the Cambodian government.

When Cambodia began its crackdown on both CNRP and the US-funded organisations supporting it, the US threatened sanctions and other punitive measures. Kem Monovithya would play a central role in promoting these punitive measures in Washington.

The Phonom Post in a December 2017 article titled, "US says more sanctions on table in response to political crackdown," would claim:
...in Washington, a panel of "witnesses" convened by the House Foreign Affairs Committee - including Kem Sokha's daughter, Kem Monovithya - called for additional action in response to the political crackdown. In a statement, Monovithya urged targeted financial sanctions against government officials responsible for undermining democracy. She also called on the US to suspend "any and all assistance for the central Cambodian Government", while "continuing democracy assistance programs for civil society, particularly those engaged in election-related matters".​
Like her farther, Kem Monovithya's collaboration with the US government goes back much further. The Washington Post in a 2006 article titled, "While in U.S., Cambodians Get a Lesson on Rights From Home," would first admit:
Kem Sokha, a former Cambodian senator and official, heads the Cambodian Center for Human Rights, which is supported by U.S. government funds. The center has held public forums to hear complaints about conditions in Cambodia.​
Regarding Kem Monovithya herself, the Washington Post would note:
Monovitha Kem, a business school graduate and aspiring lawyer, said she would lobby U.S. and international institutions to fight Hun Sen's decision.

"I would like to see the charges dropped not just for my father, but for all other activists," she said in an interview Monday. "I hope they will amend the defamation law."

Monovitha Kem has met with officials at the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs, the International Republican Institute, the U.S. Agency for International Development and major human rights groups.​
The National Democratic Institute (NDI) and International Republican Institute (IRI) are both subsidiaries of the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) which, together with the US government itself, have supported myriad subversive activities within Cambodia for years.

This includes a number of organisations cited in a May 2018 Washington Post article attempting to deny claims of US meddling by citing almost exclusively US-funded fronts operating in Cambodia.

This includes Licadho, which is funded by both the UK government and the US via USAID. It also includes Radio Free Asia and Voice of America, both of which are funded by the US government and overseen by the Broadcasting Board of Governors chaired by US Secretary of State Michael Pompeo himself. There is also the Cambodian Center for Independent Media, funded by NED subsidiaries Freedom House and IRI as well as the British Embassy and convicted financial criminal George Soros' Open Society Foundation.

Literally decades of US meddling in Cambodia's politics, including the creation of both Kem Sokha's opposition party and organisations created and funded by the US government to support it, along with plans to overthrow the current Cambodian government to install CNRP into power, represents in reality political meddling many times worse than even the most imaginative accusations made against Russia in regards to meddling in US and European politics.

US Meddling Seeks Chinese Encirclement

US interests in Cambodia go beyond merely controlling the nation's people and resources, it stems primarily from a much wider and long-term plan to encircle China with client states serving Washington's vision of perpetual American primacy in Asia.

Along with allegations from US-European leadership and their respective media conglomerations attempting to condemn Cambodia's recent elections as "illegitimate," US-European media made little effort to hide equal condemnation regarding China's inroads into Cambodia recently.

Reuters in an article titled, "Cambodia's Hun Sen has an important election backer: China," would claim:
China announced a major infrastructure project in Cambodia midway through its election campaign and denounced proposed economic sanctions by the European Union on the Southeast Asian nation.

China's ambassador in Phnom Penh also attended a ruling party rally in the Cambodian capital, according to a media report.

The flurry of moves during the three-week campaign shows China is leaving nothing to chance to ensure its most loyal ally in Southeast Asia, Cambodia's long-time ruler Hun Sen, comfortably wins Sunday's poll, political analysts said.​
Thus, while many may be tempted to defend US meddling in Cambodia as they have similar US meddling elsewhere as merely "promoting democracy" and "human rights," it is clear that US meddling in Cambodia sought to prevent China from building constructive ties with a friendly government by creating a client state that would spur Beijing in favour of Washington.

Reuters complains that Cambodia has supported Beijing over Washington amid ongoing South China Sea tensions. Reuters even obliquely suggests that infrastructure deals made between China and Cambodia during the election campaign constituted some form of political meddling. No mention of overt US meddling in Cambodian politics, including the creation and sponsorship of the main opposition party, CNRP is made in Reuters' article.

While Reuters claims Cambodian relations with the West includes "decades of diplomatic effort and billions of dollars of aid and investment," Cambodia has very little to show for it. Claims that the West "bristled at human rights violations and electoral irregularities in Cambodia" opened the door for closer Chinese-Cambodian ties begs belief considering no such human rights-based "bristling" occurs in regards to Western ties with Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the current government in Ukraine.

It is clear that the US and Europe attempted to reassert control over Cambodia through the co-opting of its government and institutions and that much of the West's supposed "investments" in Cambodia were directed into this political meddling. Conversely, China is proposing actual infrastructure projects like motorways, airports and electricity distribution networks, all areas Cambodia is critically lacking in, even after "billions of dollars of aid and investment" from the West.

Cambodia, through its ties with China and its own straightforward approach to uprooting foreign meddling in its internal affairs has averted the latest attempt by the US and Europe to destabilise the nation and exert control over its future from Washington and Brussels. Other nations in the region, including neighbouring Thailand and Malaysia, still face extensive US-European meddling including persistent street movements and large networks of US-funded media platforms, legal firms and even political parties seeking to destabilise, and if possible, overthrow local governments and independent institutions.

Only through fully recognising the threat and working together can Southeast Asia ensure the age of American-European colonisation has ended for good and a new era of multipolarism and self-determination can begin.
Joseph Thomas is chief editor of Thailand-based geopolitical journal, The New Atlas and contributor to the online magazine "New Eastern Outlook".
 
Back
Top Bottom