Congressman Etheridge Assaults Student

ScioAgapeOmnis

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
_http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/politics/3772-congressman-etheridge-assaults-student

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v60oNUoHBYM

A shocking video released today shows Congressman Bob Etheridge (D-N.C.) assaulting a student who asked him a question on a public sidewalk.

The 71 seconds of footage opens with a student in a jacket and tie greeting Etheridge with “Hi, Congressman, how are you?” The Representative seems to respond cordially enough but then mutters, “Who are you?” The student then asked a question the Congressman apparently found intolerable: “Do you fully support the Obama agenda?” At this point Etheridge stops, moves closer to the student, and asks more aggressively “Who are you?” Etheridge repeats this query one more time and then, shockingly, tries to grab the camera, interrupting the recording.

When the video resumes a few seconds later, it is obviously being shot by another student and shows Etheridge with an extremely firm grip on the first student’s right wrist, restraining him. The situation degenerates further, as the Congressman continues to ask for the student’s identity and, despite no resistance or retaliation on the student’s part, ultimately grabs him around the back of the neck and places him in a one-armed quasi-bear hug (shades of Eric Massa of male-staffer tickle-fight fame?).

Obviously, the student’s answers of “We’re just here for a project, sir” and “I’m just a student, sir” didn’t satisfy the very agitated and possibly drunk Etheridge. But it should be emphasized that the student remained unfailingly polite throughout. Moreover, while it’s customary for interviewers to announce themselves, it’s understandable that an inexperienced, apparently teenaged student might be a bit intimidated by a much larger, 50-something man of power and influence asking his identity.

More to the point, however, the student was under no legal obligation to reveal his name and had every right to film and attempt to question a public servant on a public street. In contrast, Etheridge did have a legal obligation to not become physically aggressive with a young citizen exercising his constitutional rights. The Congressman could have just kept walking, as most cowardly public officials do. He could have told the student to call his office to arrange an interview. Instead, he stopped, engaged the kid, and then pulled a Sean Penn. It was assault, and he should be charged.

I’m adamant on this last point. Remember that if the student had retaliated and the police had been called, the onus absolutely would have been placed on him (armed with the video, I’m sure he’d later have been exonerated in court, but I can’t imagine that he wouldn’t have become acquainted with a jail cell). The power differential between statesman and citizen is already profound enough to intimidate many; the last thing we need is Congressmen placing their hands — as opposed to just their laws — on citizens with impunity.

Whatever the legal ramifications, however, the political ones are interesting. This video is Tea Party gold. I can just imagine a commercial showing the truculent Etheridge leaning toward the camera and snottily asking, “Who are you?!” and the narrator responding, “I’m the one who pays your salary, Congressman!” “Who are you?!” “I’m the one who’s going to vote you out of office in November, Congressman!” I suspect Etheridge’s career is over.

There is an interesting back story here as well. Not surprisingly, as of this writing, the mainstream media have not yet reported on this incident (this may change if those of us in the real media give it enough face time). But even more interesting is the sleight-of-hand of YouTube, where the video has been posted.

As of 1:08 PM Eastern Standard Time, the Etheridge assault video is listed as having 328 views.
But it has 2,102 comments.

Is there something wrong with this picture?

Understand that comments generally represent only about three percent of views. Additionally, the view counter was also stuck on 328 when I watched the video more than an hour ago. Is this a glitch in the system? I doubt it.

As I’ve reported before, it seems that YouTube cooks the stats of videos that don’t serve the leftist agenda. Why would they do this? Because if a video registers a tremendous hit count, it is placed in the site’s “Most Viewed” section, where it receives far more exposure. Thus, suppress the view count and you suppress the story.


Now, when I first leveled this accusation, many said I was off-base. They claimed that YouTube only updates view counters a few times a day or that there was some other technical explanation for the phenomenon. But if this is true, why is the Britney Spears music video “Circus” — which ran afoul of animal-rights imperatives by featuring circus animals — not on the first few pages of YouTube’s “Most Viewed, All Time” section as its view count (61,055,298) demands? It wasn’t present there last year when I was first informed of the deception, and it isn’t there now — although a video with fewer than one million hits occupies page four.

So now I conclude this piece at 2:02 p.m. The Etheridge assault video still registers only 328 hits, the mainstream media and Google (which owns YouTube) are still unfit to provide news, and the Congressman is still unfit for office.

I bolded the above. That IS interesting - the youtube link provided in the article is going up in views now, but I found a bunch of other youtube links for the same video, here is one:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3tMcivWi-k

As of right now it has 307 views and 436 comments. How can that happen? It looks like youtube is allowing the "views" to go up on the specific link where the article mentioned that the views are frozen, but the other links remain frozen since no one linked to them in a news article?

Either way, it's nice to get an up close and personal example of what kind of psychopaths make decisions on behalf of everyone else. Since this was taped, that kid could've easily gotten away with defending himself, and I honestly wish he did.
 
The first video you linked is up past a million and three quarter views now. Funny that the second one is flagged as inappropriate for some viewers.
 
I found this report by TYT even more interesting especially at the end...

__http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDukm1ITj7M&feature=related

And take a look at eyes of the congressman, a walking corpse if I ever saw one :scared:
 
Interesting video, I have no clue what was in the mind of Congressman Bob Etheridge but his repetitive question was at least to say odd, is he all right (beside the fact he is politician, ad we know their kind).

Ethridge wiki page was immediately updated with incident and Bob's conference excuses: "I deeply and profoundly regret my reaction, and I apologize to all involved". Etheridge called a press conference where he stated that there was no excuse for his actions. He refused to speculate on the motivation of those involved and said that it had been a "long day". end quote.

Now wait a minute, could public figure excuse his actions with "long day" issue, does it mean world leaders could set the world on the fire and say the same, perhaps he need vacation, like permanent vacation, called retirement. The real question is why Bob Etheridge still holds his seat, or this is just a minor mistake according to political Cliché?
 
They're just signs, no smoking gun (as always) but there sure does seem to be a hike in the social unrest index in the US.

I mean, we have the gulf oil "spill" the "economic crisis", rising unemployment and foreclosures. Thrown in a few stories like this one (which is getting a lot of air time) and similar incidents such as the recent case of a seattle police officer punching a 17-year old girl in the face for jaywalking, and I have to wonder where, if anywhere, it is all going?

Sott editor George Wellor mentioned a shift in perspective in his area in a recent Sott Focus, but how widespread is it?
 
Not sure where it's going or if there is a shift in perspective, but I did overhear an enouraging conversation last week. I was in another part of the country, a fairly conservative area and was in a grocery store pushing my cart when I heard two old white guys talking about the Gaza Boat attack by Israel, they were kind of animated, and having heard some talk radio about this (Zionist controlled, of course) I expected to not like what I was hearing so I started pushing my cart faster to get away. But they were speaking pretty loudly and it turned out I was delighted by what I heard. The one guy said, "Can you imagine what people would be saying if Iran did this?" and "The nerve of them, there was even a veteran of the USS Liberty on board!"

So that was pretty cool, especially since the men didn't feel they had to say these things in hushed voices.

But overall, any change in perspective in the U.S. will probably be vectored in destructive and crazy directions, unfortunately.

Perceval said:
They're just signs, no smoking gun (as always) but there sure does seem to be a hike in the social unrest index in the US.

I mean, we have the gulf oil "spill" the "economic crisis", rising unemployment and foreclosures. Thrown in a few stories like this one (which is getting a lot of air time) and similar incidents such as the recent case of a seattle police officer punching a 17-year old girl in the face for jaywalking, and I have to wonder where, if anywhere, it is all going?

Sott editor George Wellor mentioned a shift in perspective in his area in a recent Sott Focus, but how widespread is it?
 
Perceval said:
They're just signs, no smoking gun (as always) but there sure does seem to be a hike in the social unrest index in the US.

I mean, we have the gulf oil "spill" the "economic crisis", rising unemployment and foreclosures. Thrown in a few stories like this one (which is getting a lot of air time) and similar incidents such as the recent case of a seattle police officer punching a 17-year old girl in the face for jaywalking, and I have to wonder where, if anywhere, it is all going?

Sott editor George Wellor mentioned a shift in perspective in his area in a recent Sott Focus, but how widespread is it?

Since ya'll can't toot your own horn, allow me:

You guys have been busting your collective butts since 1994. You have been researching, collecting data, testing, interacting with people, overcoming obstacles and teaching others, and all this has been public. For the last (approx.) 16 years, Laura and everyone and people all over the world have been contributing the dots, connecting the dots and publishing the results that are helping people assemble the big picture of what's really going on in the world. From its embryonic development and through stages of knowledge from simple dissociation to full-blown psychopathology, you now have a 16 year old - your "baby" (the Work) and he/she is coming of age and ready to have a 'massive' impact on the world if the 'desperate push for total control' is any indication.

I say 'coming of age' to refer to the fact that you guys have been constantly pushing, assembling and reinforcing the big picture. At this point, the big picture is being, and has been driven in to the social reality through SoTT and Facebook and other venues and grooved in over and over. Today, the average person just has to 'connect' with this collective unconscious (Jung) or 'tune in' to the social fields (Sheldrake) and they can much more easily 'pick up' what's already been done so well by others. They can 'grasp' the truth much more easily than if they had to figure it all out by themselves starting from scratch, and even if they think it's their own intuition.

At least, that's what I feel like are driving these 'Changing Perspectives'. :)
 
Mr Premise said:
But overall, any change in perspective in the U.S. will probably be vectored in destructive and crazy directions, unfortunately.

Highly probable. That's why we all need to work hard - on ourselves and for our network's aim - in order to counter some of the destructive vectoring along the lines of Alex Jones and his ilk.

Bud said:
Today, the average person just has to 'connect' with this collective unconscious (Jung) or 'tune in' to the social fields (Sheldrake) and they can much more easily 'pick up' what's already been done so well by others. They can 'grasp' the truth much more easily than if they had to figure it all out by themselves starting from scratch, and even if they think it's their own intuition.

Here's hoping that happens to those who sincerely seek the truth. They'll still have to work to fully understand what's going on...and pay in advance as Madame DeSalzmann so aptly points out.
 
Mr. Premise said:
But overall, any change in perspective in the U.S. will probably be vectored in destructive and crazy directions, unfortunately.

I don't doubt it, but as the Pathocrats know so well, in every crisis there is opportunity. They have been exploiting crises (either natural or made by them) for centuries and to their own benefit and the detriment of others. In any upcoming upheaval, there will be opportunities for us and others to get the truth out there, even as the bad guys try to drive it towards confusion and mayhem. There's nothing like a good global crisis to wake people up, and when they do, the lighthouse will be blazing as bright as we can make it, to attract the "pale and downtrodden".
 
Perceval said:
Mr. Premise said:
But overall, any change in perspective in the U.S. will probably be vectored in destructive and crazy directions, unfortunately.

I don't doubt it, but as the Pathocrats know so well, in every crisis there is opportunity. They have been exploiting crises (either natural or made by them) for centuries and to their own benefit and the detriment of others. In any upcoming upheaval, there will be opportunities for us and others to get the truth out there, even as the bad guys try to drive it towards confusion and mayhem. There's nothing like a good global crisis to wake people up, and when they do, the lighthouse will be blazing as bright as we can make it, to attract the "pale and downtrodden".

Yep, that's how I see it. We may be using different metaphorical devices (and yours may be more accurate), but now that the Work could be viewed as an STO being, nothing will totally stop it. It can't be thrown in jail because its physicality is variable - it consists of all of us and anyone who does this Work and promotes this Work.

Today, anyone can join up as a 'cell' in the body and start contributing towards further growth, if they are not a pathological organism themselves, osit. :P


Edit: Wording for clarity.
 
Back
Top Bottom