It appears that the PTB have finally come up with a P.R. campaign to shoot down the question, "If you're already vaccinated, why are you bothering me? I'm no risk to you (if your vaccine works)."
And here it is! -The Fruit of (surely) millions of consultation dollars with Public Relations executives. -Who, no doubt, sleep like babies at night:
[
Link]
(The skinny: "The vaccine IS mostly effective, like 75% effective. But that leaves a wide gaping 25% hole in your vax shield! Through which those awful, awful unvaxxed people can penetrate with their dirty ways. AND they are the ones most likely to be sick! Just look! Everybody is saying that 99% of Covid hospitalizations are unvaxxed people!")
-WHICH, I have no doubt, is one of those hyper-inflated claims based on lots of statistical fudge work and doctors in denial. 99% of Covid hospitalizations are unvaxxed people? So basically, ALL of them. Even though the drugs are only 75% effective? (According to the stats provided by the FDA). How does that add up? (And I've come across much lower estimates of effectiveness. But those people never wind up in hospital? It's ONLY those unvaxxed people? Oh Reaaaaaally?)
It's a lie which appears to go hand in hand with the sudden convenient influx of news items which appeared over the last 3 days or so, claiming that most hospitalizations due to Covid are among unvaxxed people.
-A 'fact' which flies in the face of what we had been learning out of Israel and other sources over the last couple of months.
Here's one item culled from the mass of Official Claims being fed to the media:
VERDICT False. Unvaccinated people are much more vulnerable to catching - and becoming seriously ill from - COVID-19.
[Because] Of those currently in hospital in the UK, most are unvaccinated, health officials say. “From January first to around mid-
April, we’ve had around 4,300 admissions to the hospital with COVID. Of those patients, 99% were not fully vaccinated,” Eduardo Mireles, director of the medical intensive care unit, said in a statement released by the hospital (here).
[
Link] (That article came out on Sept 21st. Just three days ago.)
The problem with the claim being... there were very few people fully vaccinated from January to mid-April at all. -In Canada, for instance, the earliest of the early adopters were getting their
first shots in
March of this year. Who were they testing exactly? And we know there were hospitalizations among vaccine recipients, (as a result of the vaccine) but I guess those were not "Covid-19-associated" hospital visits. The amount of cognitive dissonance in place, "It's not the drugs!" was rampant.
This is the chart which appears to be the source upon which the "Most hospitalizations" claim comes from:
Bearing in mind, people couldn't get their second shot until 30 days had passed after the first one, so only the very
earliest adopters would be represented on this graph, while the sample size of people not fully vaccinated would far out-represent them. Basically, this graph is misleading. The green and blue lines change value not just in the X and Y axis, but also in the value of what they represent. A green dot on one side of the graph isn't equal to a green dot on the other side.
Which is not to say that the vaccine may not be ineffective, just that the claims compared to unvaccinated people are not reliable.
And numbers aside, frankly the there is lots of room for fudging numbers to pad the FDA's claim.
Note the title: "Covid-19-
associated hospitalization rates".
I don't have any direct evidence of corruption wrt this specific study; this is just a cursory look at the claim, BUT, given the long and storied history of ponerized agencies flat-out lying through statistics to gain power, -and given the current pressure to quash resistance, it seems unlikely that any of this can be taken at face value.
english
...
