The Covid legal saga against among others the Dutch state, Mark Rutte, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla and Bill Gates before the Courts in The Netherlands continues, see my posts on page 1968 of this thread.
Peter Stassen, the lawyer who took over from Arno van Kessel, yesterday pleaded before the Court of Appeal in Amsterdam regarding the District Court's denial on 20th August 2025 of the hearing of expert witnesses like Catherine Austin Fitts (Former U.S. Government Chief Officer), Dr. Mike Yeadon (former top scientist at Pfizer), Alexandra Latypova (former pharmaceutical), researcher Katherine Watt and Dr. Joseph Sansone (psychotherapist specializing in clinical hypnosis).
Stassen appealed before the Court of Appeal in Amsterdam about the procedural question: can these experts be heard? According to the plaintiffs, these experts from different disciplines – science, law, psychology and policy – can shed light on decision-making around COVID measures and vaccination.
During the hearing, lawyer Peter Stassen, who represents the plaintiffs, made a very fierce plea. He argued that Gates is part of an elite network with a “satanic ideology.”
In addition, Stassen accused the Dutch state of lying. He argued that the judiciary is being misled by incorrect information.
Stassen also referred to the Epstein case and the Epstein files. He said no one is being prosecuted in connection with these documents because engaged elites adhere to a “mafia-like silence code.”
Meanwhile, it is precisely the people who act in the current trial as claimants – people who have been damaged by COVID vaccines or have lost loved ones – that are dismissed as liars or as dangerous.
Stassen said during the hearing: “Give me the facts and I will give you the law.”
The lawyer stressed to the judges that it is necessary that the court also consider alternative statements or facts. The truth can never be revealed otherwise.
He argued that there is “the greatest crime against humanity,” and that the persons charged in this case are those responsible for that crime.
Stassen told the judges that they must ultimately decide who in the courtroom are the “children of God,” and who are “children of the devil.”
After the hearing, Stassen told the press that the released Epstein documents show that there is a powerful elite acting against the interests of humanity. These documents undermine governments' argument that such ideas would be mere conspiracy theories.
Stassen went on to say that he thinks his side in this case is getting stronger and stronger and that there is a kind of “information war” going on. For more and more people, it becomes clear what really happened during the pandemic.
Finally, Stassen described the case not only as a legal battle, but also as a psychological and spiritual struggle. “It is ultimately about a struggle for truth and justice.”
He called for continuing to fight for that truth and not give up.
The Court's ruling on the appeal is expected on April 9.
See also this post on X:
Let's keep our fingers crossed and hope that, even if they are ultimately not successful, this case WILL lead to more awareness around what is going on in a broader sense, and that the 47-51% number the C's mentioned keeps growing and growing!
Peter Stassen, the lawyer who took over from Arno van Kessel, yesterday pleaded before the Court of Appeal in Amsterdam regarding the District Court's denial on 20th August 2025 of the hearing of expert witnesses like Catherine Austin Fitts (Former U.S. Government Chief Officer), Dr. Mike Yeadon (former top scientist at Pfizer), Alexandra Latypova (former pharmaceutical), researcher Katherine Watt and Dr. Joseph Sansone (psychotherapist specializing in clinical hypnosis).
Stassen appealed before the Court of Appeal in Amsterdam about the procedural question: can these experts be heard? According to the plaintiffs, these experts from different disciplines – science, law, psychology and policy – can shed light on decision-making around COVID measures and vaccination.
During the hearing, lawyer Peter Stassen, who represents the plaintiffs, made a very fierce plea. He argued that Gates is part of an elite network with a “satanic ideology.”
In addition, Stassen accused the Dutch state of lying. He argued that the judiciary is being misled by incorrect information.
Stassen also referred to the Epstein case and the Epstein files. He said no one is being prosecuted in connection with these documents because engaged elites adhere to a “mafia-like silence code.”
Meanwhile, it is precisely the people who act in the current trial as claimants – people who have been damaged by COVID vaccines or have lost loved ones – that are dismissed as liars or as dangerous.
Stassen said during the hearing: “Give me the facts and I will give you the law.”
The lawyer stressed to the judges that it is necessary that the court also consider alternative statements or facts. The truth can never be revealed otherwise.
He argued that there is “the greatest crime against humanity,” and that the persons charged in this case are those responsible for that crime.
Stassen told the judges that they must ultimately decide who in the courtroom are the “children of God,” and who are “children of the devil.”
After the hearing, Stassen told the press that the released Epstein documents show that there is a powerful elite acting against the interests of humanity. These documents undermine governments' argument that such ideas would be mere conspiracy theories.
Stassen went on to say that he thinks his side in this case is getting stronger and stronger and that there is a kind of “information war” going on. For more and more people, it becomes clear what really happened during the pandemic.
Finally, Stassen described the case not only as a legal battle, but also as a psychological and spiritual struggle. “It is ultimately about a struggle for truth and justice.”
He called for continuing to fight for that truth and not give up.
The Court's ruling on the appeal is expected on April 9.
See also this post on X:
Let's keep our fingers crossed and hope that, even if they are ultimately not successful, this case WILL lead to more awareness around what is going on in a broader sense, and that the 47-51% number the C's mentioned keeps growing and growing!
