A document has been published in Germany - internal instructions. Testimony from a psychopathic government
I read this through with all the probabilities, statistics and the worst point for me is point 4.
Zwölftausend Tote – im günstigsten Fall: Ein internes Papier aus dem Bundesinnenministerium zur Eindämmung der Corona-Krise sorgte Ende März für Wirbel. Darin sprechen sich die Autoren unter anderem für flächendeckende Tests der Bevölkerung nach dem Vorbild Südkoreas aus. Doch erst jetzt kommt...
www.focus.de
4. Conclusions for action and open communication
4 a. Clarify worst case!
We have to get away from communication centered on the case mortality rate. When the mortality rate, which sounds insignificant in percentage terms, and which mainly affects the elderly, many then think subconsciously and admittedly: «Well, we can get rid of the elderly who are pulling our economy down, we are already too many on earth anyway , and with a little luck I inherit a little earlier ». These mechanisms have certainly played down the epidemic in the past. In order to achieve the desired shock effect, the concrete effects of a screening on human society must be clarified:
1) Many seriously ill people are brought to the hospital by their relatives but are refused, and die painfully at home struggling for air. Choking or not getting enough air is a primal fear for everyone. The situation in which there is nothing you can do to help relatives who are in danger of life is also the same. The pictures from Italy are disturbing.
2) "Children will hardly suffer from the epidemic": Wrong. Children will get infected easily, even with exit restrictions, e.g. with the neighboring children. Then when they infect their parents and one of them dies painfully at home and they feel guilty because, e.g. forgot to wash your hands after playing, it's the most terrible thing a child can ever experience
3) Consequential damage: Even if we only have reports on individual cases so far, they paint an alarming picture. Even those who seem to have healed after a mild course can apparently experience relapses at any time, which then suddenly end in death, due to cardiac infarction or lung failure, because the virus has found its way into the lungs or heart unnoticed. These may be isolated cases, but will always hover over those who have been infected like a sword of Damocles. A much more common consequence is fatigue and reduced lung capacity for months and probably years, as has been reported many times by SARS survivors and is now the case with COVID-19, although the duration cannot, of course, be estimated
In addition, historical arguments should also be used, according to the mathematical formula: 2019 = 1919 + 1929
One only has to illustrate the figures shown above with regard to the assumed mortality rate (more than 1% with optimal health care, i.e. well over 3% due to overloading with infection), compared to 2% with the Spanish flu, and with regard to the expected economic crisis in the event of containment failure, then this formula will make sense to everyone.