Another portal of attack for the Anti-Vax crowd, on Twitter with the meme of #COVIDIOTS.
And the lemming's are running with it.



Oh no CDC: “characteristics of a superspreading event” Sturgis Motorcycle Rally 2021.
Hmmm,.. the reporter has no mask..🧐🤫


One of my favorites is that Simpson's character (the naive fat kid who sounds very childish for his age. The cop's son. I can't remember his name.) Anyway, it's a gif of him he's sitting at his computer with google pulled up claiming, "I'm a resurcher!"

Hold on. Dammit... A picture's worth a thousand... Here it is:

google-what-i-want-to-be-true-i-coleco-ylecta-18691787.png


Okay. -I have sympathy for people who need these kinds of memes to express on their behalf, to be clever and succinct where they don't feel adequate. Many here will have to stretch far back to be able to remember, (I barely can), but there was a time long ago when the world was very big and very confusing, when it was simply impossible to consider that we might be smart enough, good enough, strong enough to grapple with its enormity. That we might deserve to interface with knowledge.

I recall the realization of it being possible to read through complicated tracts of text and to not only extract understanding, but to actually see flaws in the claims and arguments presented there. I was in my late teens when I first realized that modern scientists and doctors and other very smart people could be wrong and that my mind was in fact worthy of disagreeing with them. That I might be able to see logical pathways which were obscured to others. Wow!

While this might have been an inevitable bit of growing up, I almost wonder if it was really just a lucky break. -That it was just chance I should have come upon this discovery; that if I hadn't one day been bored and decided to just read something beyond my comprehension (in an old Scientific American magazine I found in a stack at the back of a classroom) and tried to grapple with it, I might have remained just another bumper car in the game of life. In recognizing that speed bump, and how much effort it took to get over it, and feeling the rush of acceleration I did upon doing so.., it was very evident that it was indeed An Important Barrier.

I suspect many people simply never learned how to overcome that barrier, or that the barrier wasn't merely another piece of solid wall but in fact a heavy door... That they were also allowed to have and to use their own minds.

For such people, Consensus Opinion, herd-thinking, really IS the best way to determine what reality is and how to navigate it. -Because they have never experienced the breaching of that Important Barrier, they have never learned that it is POSSIBLE to take responsibility for their own thoughts and discoveries. It's not that they don't want to. It's they can't comprehend the possibility of ever doing so. -And so those who they observe disagreeing with authorities, regular people who do not wear lab coats or stand at the fronts of lecture halls with badges and hats but who nonetheless refuse to be obedient, those people really DO seem to have something wrong with them.

But it gets worse! -And this is the revealing part. When some authority figures start claiming that other authority figures are wrong, are liars.., then there is no way to know who is telling the truth. -Because the humble Wiggums never breached the Important Barrier. They don't believe they are allowed to interface with knowledge, or that knowledge can arrive in some other way than pre-digested and handed to you from authority.

For such people, determining which authority camp you are in becomes very important. A matter of survival.

Tim Pool has pointed out numerous times that Liberals tend to only listen to Liberal news sources, while Conservatives are more likely to listen to both Liberal and Conservative sources. I find that very interesting. I think it indicates something about how knowledge itself is approached and understood.

I wonder if it is possible for people, as adults, to crack out of the relationship boundaries they have built with knowledge. To get over that speed bump?
 
Last edited:
One of my favorites is that Simpson's character (the naive fat kid who sounds very childish for his age. The cop's son. I can't remember his name.) Anyway, it's a gif of him he's sitting at his computer with google pulled up claiming, "I'm a resurcher!"

Hold on. Dammit... A picture's worth a thousand... Here it is:

google-what-i-want-to-be-true-i-coleco-ylecta-18691787.png


Okay. -I have sympathy for people who need these kinds of memes to express on their behalf, to be clever and succinct where they don't feel adequate. Many here will have to stretch far back to be able to remember, (I barely can), but there was a time long ago when the world was very big and very confusing, when it was simply impossible to consider that we might be smart enough, good enough, strong enough to grapple with its enormity. That we might deserve to interface with knowledge.

I recall the realization of it being possible to read through complicated tracts of text and to not only extract understanding, but to actually see flaws in the claims and arguments presented there. I was in my late teens when I first realized that modern scientists and doctors and other very smart people could be wrong and that my mind was in fact worthy of disagreeing with them. That I might be able to see logical pathways which were obscured to others. Wow!

While this might have been an inevitable bit of growing up, I almost wonder if it was really just a lucky break. -That it was just chance I should have come upon this discovery; that if I hadn't one day been bored and decided to just read something beyond my comprehension (in an old Scientific American magazine I found in a stack at the back of a classroom) and tried to grapple with it, I might have remained just another bumper car in the game of life. In recognizing that speed bump, and how much effort it took to get over it, and feeling the rush of acceleration I did upon doing so.., it was very evident that it was indeed An Important Barrier.

I suspect many people simply never learned how to overcome that barrier, or that the barrier wasn't merely another piece of solid wall but in fact a heavy door... That they were also allowed to have and to use their own minds.

For such people, Consensus Opinion, herd-thinking, really IS the best way to determine what reality is and how to navigate it. -Because they have never experienced the breaching of that Important Barrier, they have never learned that it is POSSIBLE to take responsibility for their own thoughts and discoveries. It's not that they don't want to. It's they can't comprehend the possibility of ever doing so. -And so those who they observe disagreeing with authorities, regular people who do not wear lab coats or stand at the fronts of lecture halls with badges and hats but who nonetheless refuse to be obedient, those people really DO seem to have something wrong with them.

But it gets worse! -And this is the revealing part. When some authority figures start claiming that other authority figures are wrong, are liars.., then there is no way to know who is telling the truth. -Because the humble Wiggums never breached the Important Barrier. They don't believe they are allowed to interface with knowledge, or that knowledge can arrive in some other way than pre-digested and handed to you from authority.

For such people, determining which authority camp you are in becomes very important. A matter of survival.

Tim Pool has pointed out numerous times that Liberals tend to only listen to Liberal news sources, while Conservatives are more likely to listen to both Liberal and Conservative sources. I find that very interesting. I think it indicates something about how knowledge itself is approached and understood.

I wonder if it is possible for people, as adults, to crack out of the relationship boundaries they have built with knowledge. To get over that speed bump?
It all reads like they are advocating for being stupid. Saying you can't figure out anything by yourself and should always revert to experts.

Then what's the point of being a human being? This is all just the plan of dumbing people down and making them slaves to an elite.

Btw, there are rumours that the FDA are planning on giving full approval to the Pfizer jab in September.
 
That's really smart!

Though...

The shot goes in very deep. An inch or more into the deltoid muscle just below your shoulder. It's not like squeezing out a zit or blackhead.

But the cup stays on for 20 minutes or so, with a strong vacuum inside the whole time; enough to draw blood up to the surface to form a dark purple bruise. Presumably it would get some of the drug out.
This method has a long history in medicine.

\

Despite every guest and staff member aboard the Carnival Vista being vaccinated the ship still experienced a coronavirus outbreak.

The ship departed from Galveston Texas on July 31 and has decided to continue its journey despite the coronavirus cases aboard the ship.
Only brain-dead won't put 2+2 together when reading such stories from this point forward.
 
Last edited:
Yes, what you are saying is logical yet the opposite is what is being done. I had Covid in January, but the health authorities says that the antibodies are no longer sufficiently there after 6 months and thus one jab of vaccine is needed.. Those who receive the vaccine get a vaxpass which is valid for a year though studies show that the vaccine isn't effective very long if at all. So the approach isn't logical, but then again, not much of what they are saying is logical.
At work, from tomorrow we will also have to get vaccinated or present an antigen test no older than 48 hours when we work on the trains to France. The tests are paid for by the company. There has been a strong pressure on me and those of my colleagues who so far haven't been vaccinated to go and do it. The atmosphere is similar to what Sebastian Haffner is describing in "Defying Hitler" about the pressure to join the party.
@Aeneas how are you planning to navigate the situation?

Also, on antibodies, they always wane but you have memory B cells. That means when you are faced with the infection again, your body recalls the antibodies. Antibodies aren't designed to stay in the bloodstream forever. Can you challenge the company with this and you'll need to get everything in writing if push comes to shove.


Summary​

Protective immunity against reinfection is one of the most important consequences of adaptive immunity operating through the clonal selection of lymphocytes. Protective immunity depends not only on preformed antibody and armed effector T cells, but most importantly on the establishment of a population of lymphocytes that mediate long-lived immunological memory. The capacity of these cells to respond rapidly to restimulation with the same antigen can be transferred to naive recipients by primed B and T cells. The precise changes that distinguish naive, effector, and memory lymphocytes are now being characterized and, with the advent of receptor-specific reagents, the relative contributions of clonal expansion and differentiation to the memory phenotype are rapidly being clarified. Memory B cells can also be distinguished by changes in their immunoglobulin genes because of isotype switching and somatic hypermutation, and secondary and subsequent immune responses are characterized by antibodies with increasing affinity for the antigen.

I think the emphasis is on them to prove you don't have immunological memory having been naturally infected in the past. Also don't forget having been infected your immune system would have encountered the WHOLE virus and therefore the response would be more complete as compared to just encountering spike protein that your body makes from the vaccine.

Don't let some naive people / robots bully you @Aeneas. I'm sure you won't!!
 
It's not that they don't want to. It's they can't comprehend the possibility of ever doing so.

This is something very important and powerful at the same time. It comes to prove the truth of what the C's said: "Learn to think in unlimited terms."

And thinking in unlimited terms has a lot to do with that aspect of possibility. When a person denies the possibility of something it is usually associated with some kind of belief that limits them:

They don't believe they are allowed to interface with knowledge

This is tragic when you look at it closely. When there is a vast, an infinite potential for information/creation, if you withdraw by your own choice and disconnect yourself from that potential/possibility you are basically committing ontological suicide. (soul smashing)
 
I've got some interesting stories. One of my partner's friends is a masseuse who has been vaccinated - the other day she was puzzled by an encounter she had with a potential client. This potential client had called asking for the possibility of booking a massage, however, before she did, she wanted to know if she was vaccinated or not. Thinking naturally that the would-be client was worried about the possibility of getting covid, she replied that she's been fully vaccinated and also regularly tests herself. At this point the would-be client mentioned that she was only interested in a masseuse who was unvaccinated and promptly hang up. Needless to say, my partner's friend was quite puzzled as this was highly unexpected.

Another one, my sister who is single was telling me about someone she just met. They met through online dating. In any case, what she said was the online dating websites and apps now have functionality where vaccinated people can proudly show their status. To her surprise though she said she came across quite a lot of profiles where people were specifically saying they are only interested in meeting a non-vaccinated person!!! She's not vaccinated but she also doesn't follow this stuff - to her it appeared puzzling as she thought it was meant to be the other way round and so was curious to know why people were loudly proclaiming this as if there was something specifically wrong with vaccinated people!

So it's interesting, ey! Is this one of those where the PTB were targeting one thing but then the reality delivers the opposite?
 
I've got some interesting stories. One of my partner's friends is a masseuse who has been vaccinated - the other day she was puzzled by an encounter she had with a potential client. This potential client had called asking for the possibility of booking a massage, however, before she did, she wanted to know if she was vaccinated or not. Thinking naturally that the would-be client was worried about the possibility of getting covid, she replied that she's been fully vaccinated and also regularly tests herself. At this point the would-be client mentioned that she was only interested in a masseuse who was unvaccinated and promptly hang up. Needless to say, my partner's friend was quite puzzled as this was highly unexpected.

Another one, my sister who is single was telling me about someone she just met. They met through online dating. In any case, what she said was the online dating websites and apps now have functionality where vaccinated people can proudly show their status. To her surprise though she said she came across quite a lot of profiles where people were specifically saying they are only interested in meeting a non-vaccinated person!!! She's not vaccinated but she also doesn't follow this stuff - to her it appeared puzzling as she thought it was meant to be the other way round and so was curious to know why people were loudly proclaiming this as if there was something specifically wrong with vaccinated people!

So it's interesting, ey! Is this one of those where the PTB were targeting one thing but then the reality delivers the opposite?

But, don't you think that just those people know that there is LITERALLY something wrong with those who chose to vaccinate? I mean, this whole thread itself has provided tons of evidence of the effects of these vaccines. For the unvaccinated to take that stance on the vaccinated to me indicates that they know the same thing being talked about here or that their instincts are telling them that it's not a good idea to be around a potential biological time bomb...
 
@Aeneas how are you planning to navigate the situation?
There are different ways to navigate the situation. The first is to go along with the antigen testing, which based on my schedule means testing in each of the coming 3 weeks. There is also the option to change to a different team, which does not cross the border. This option is only possible after the 1st of September. Another option which some of my colleagues might use is to call in sick. There are more options, the last of which is early retirement, but I think it is important to not panic. To be patient and see how things develop. There will be push back and there is also the possibility that things can unravel spectacularly due to yet unimagined events. What I find most concerning is to see how the pressure causes concerns and sleepless nights for colleagues of mine not least those with young children.

I think the emphasis is on them to prove you don't have immunological memory having been naturally infected in the past. Also don't forget having been infected your immune system would have encountered the WHOLE virus and therefore the response would be more complete as compared to just encountering spike protein that your body makes from the vaccine.
I don't think it carries much weight even if it true and shown in studies to be true. The company can and will just hide behind the utterings of the health ministry who can again hide by the WHO or the CDC. Confrontations will only in this case make you stand out and be vilified, especially as the hierarchical system is largely ponerized. So at the moment it is a matter of "being gentle as doves and wise as serpents".

In regard to what you wrote about the immune system remembering the virus and being immune to the whole virus, then I remember a video, where it was mentioned how those how got SARS Cov -1 in 2003 still were immune to SARS Cov-2. It was mentioned that SARS Cov-1 was 80% similar to SARS Cov-2 and thus the immune system was still able to counter it. The new variants of Cov-19 are apparently 99+% similar to the other strains, thus the immune system can easily counter it in people who have had Covid.
 
Looks like the marine industry is having a problem with crews and the clot-shot.

Now, as even MSM acknowledged recently (during last 2-3 days), there’s an upsurge in so-called “covid” hospitalization and deaths in a number of very peculiar countries. Iceland, Gibraltar, Singapore, Israel – all of these countries boasted the highest percentage of jabbed population, and all of them are basically, “islands”, isolated geographically and physically. As all of them acknowledged through gritted teeth, the overwhelming majority of hospitalized persons are those “vaccinated”. Same story unfolding in USA. It’s not a “third” or 333rd wave of “covid variant”, it’s a tsunami of “vaccine” poisoned sick and dying people.

Ongoing upsurge in “covid” cases among crew is, beyond a reasonable doubt, the result of mass crews “vaccination”. Idiots (worse than idiots – colluders in “vaccination” crime against humanity) from BIMCO and the International Chamber of Shipping warn about looming serious shortage in the total supply of officers by 2026. Professional sea labor deficit will hit shipping much earlier than 2026, it’s already happening.
Many sensible and cautious seamen, I believe, already made their choice and prefer to stay at home, refusing even most lucrative contracts, simply because nearly all contracts and companies require “vaccination”. Better to be alive and healthy, than to be very well paid for some months to come, and then lose life or health.

Shipowners who’re still human and have some brains left, should I believe, assist their crews in obtaining “vaccination certificates” without actual jab, there’s already market for this product, growing fast and wide. By doing that, you will save your people from very serious health negative consequences and deaths, and you’ll save yourselves from inevitable bankruptcies. “Vaccines” ruin crews health and more and more often, kill them, and with that, ruin your business. By saving your crews from deadly shots, you’ll get a tremendous leverage in what is still a market. You’ll enjoy healthy crews and uninterrupted voyages.
Wait until seasonal flu strikes, you idiots, I mean those who coerced their crews into full “vaccination”. You’ll get your “serious shortage in the total supply of officers” long before 2026.
Link
 

The head of Emergencies of the University Assistance Complex of Salamanca, Rafael Borrás, has died in the early hours of this Saturday. Borrás, 65, has suffered a heart attack that has ended his life, as confirmed by the Ical agency with sources close to the family.
The doctor was in Badajoz spending his summer vacations while the heart attack took place.

In addition to a renowned family doctor, Borrás was the first health worker to be vaccinated against Covid in Salamanca, an event that he was "very excited about." In this way he wanted to encourage "all personnel, health and non-health, to get vaccinated" , leaving the message that "it is the most effective tool in the future to stop this pandemic that has been ravaging us for a year and is preventing us from lead a normal life.
 
Yes, what you are saying is logical yet the opposite is what is being done. I had Covid in January, but the health authorities says that the antibodies are no longer sufficiently there after 6 months and thus one jab of vaccine is needed.. Those who receive the vaccine get a vaxpass which is valid for a year though studies show that the vaccine isn't effective very long if at all. So the approach isn't logical, but then again, not much of what they are saying is logical.
At work, from tomorrow we will also have to get vaccinated or present an antigen test no older than 48 hours when we work on the trains to France. The tests are paid for by the company. There has been a strong pressure on me and those of my colleagues who so far haven't been vaccinated to go and do it. The atmosphere is similar to what Sebastian Haffner is describing in "Defying Hitler" about the pressure to join the party.

It is forbidden to harass people for a therapeutic experience in exchange for your salary, for a job etc. ... You can never force someone to be part of a therapeutic research, it is against all national, European and international laws, you must keep all the documents and proofs of harassment that you may have. You have to tell them that there are threats of lawsuits for complicity in attempted poisoning, for extortion of consent, abuse of power...

There is no law that forces you to get vaccinated and they can't make a law about a vaccine that isn't even a vaccine, what are they going to make it about? One, on the obligation to be a guinea pig? That will never pass.


C’est interdit d’harcèle les gens pour une expérience thérapeutique contre votre salaire, contre un emploi etc. … On ne force jamais quelqu’un à faire partie d’une recherche thérapeutique, c’est contraire à toutes les lois nationaux, européen et internationaux, il faut surtout garder tous les documents et preuves de harcèlements que vous pouvez avoir. Il faut leur dire qu’il y a des menaces de procès pour complicité de tentative d’empoisonnement, pour extorsion du consentement, abus de pouvoir…

Il n’y a aucune loi qui t’oblige à te faire vacciner et ils ne peuvent pas faire une loi sur un vaccin qui n’en n’est même pas un, sur quoi vont-ils la faire ? Une, sur l’obligation d’être un cobaye ? Ça ne passera jamais.
 
Does the article say when he was vaxxed? I’m wondering about the time period between the jabs and death. From what I’ve read, in some cases death occurs around 5 months after the 2nd jab. That’s also the time that, according to Robert Malone, the antigen levels produced by the vaxx have decreased close to zero and when ADE might occur.
 
Does the article say when he was vaxxed?

I found this article: El jefe del Servicio de Urgencias del Hospital, el primer sanitario vacunado: “He venido muy ilusionado”

Vaccination against COVID has already begun among healthcare personnel. Rafael Borrás, head of the Emergency Department of the Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, has been the first of the Complejo Asistencial de Salamanca to be vaccinated. "I was very excited," says Borrás, who adds that the vaccine has not hurt him: "It is a small prick similar to the flu.

Borrás affirms that the vaccine "is the most effective tool in the future to stop this pandemic that is preventing us from living a normal life" and encourages everyone to get vaccinated.

Article date: 15 Jan 2021
 
I've got some interesting stories. One of my partner's friends is a masseuse who has been vaccinated - the other day she was puzzled by an encounter she had with a potential client. This potential client had called asking for the possibility of booking a massage, however, before she did, she wanted to know if she was vaccinated or not. Thinking naturally that the would-be client was worried about the possibility of getting covid, she replied that she's been fully vaccinated and also regularly tests herself. At this point the would-be client mentioned that she was only interested in a masseuse who was unvaccinated and promptly hang up. Needless to say, my partner's friend was quite puzzled as this was highly unexpected.

Another one, my sister who is single was telling me about someone she just met. They met through online dating. In any case, what she said was the online dating websites and apps now have functionality where vaccinated people can proudly show their status. To her surprise though she said she came across quite a lot of profiles where people were specifically saying they are only interested in meeting a non-vaccinated person!!! She's not vaccinated but she also doesn't follow this stuff - to her it appeared puzzling as she thought it was meant to be the other way round and so was curious to know why people were loudly proclaiming this as if there was something specifically wrong with vaccinated people!

So it's interesting, ey! Is this one of those where the PTB were targeting one thing but then the reality delivers the opposite?

I decided to make my stance obvious on my profile a few months ago, for that specific reason - to spread awareness. The joke is in french, saying, "I love x, y, cooking, and I really love women - but I don't eat GMOs, so if you're vaxxed, sorry!"

I don't expect to form a family this late in the game, but I still felt it would be helpful to signal to those with ears to hear.
 
Does the article say when he was vaxxed? I’m wondering about the time period between the jabs and death. From what I’ve read, in some cases death occurs around 5 months after the 2nd jab. That’s also the time that, according to Robert Malone, the antigen levels produced by the vaxx have decreased close to zero and when ADE might occur.


I think that's him? Video posted on 15 Jan. If that was first jab, second jab would have been 21 days later, so early February. Death on 7 August would mean 6 months to death post 2nd jab in his case.
 
Back
Top Bottom