anart said:[...] otherwise you're never going to move one centimeter from where you currently are.
" moving of assembly point" from Castaneda? :/ I am so sorry if it is not the good term, I do not have Castaneda in English...
anart said:[...] otherwise you're never going to move one centimeter from where you currently are.
And in my opinion, everything is symbolic in our lives, as above so below, as within so without. A messy home, for example, may be symbolic of the owners' inner state. No matter how simple or in your face the situation is, I think one can learn to 'see' something and learn a lesson. Just my experience. :/Muxel said:My concern was, this event is insignificant compared to larger-scale events (everything can be said to be "symbolic"). Scale-wise, collapsing cranes everywhere warrants more attention than one sunken cruise liner blown up by the media. However, like SeekinTruth said, something can be learned from this (in my opinion, tiny) event. So, scale may not really matter.
MK Scarlett said:anart said:[...] otherwise you're never going to move one centimeter from where you currently are.
" moving of assembly point" from Castaneda? :/ I am so sorry if it is not the good term, I do not have Castaneda in English...
Pashalis said:what I find interesting is the media attention to this.
Haven't you noticed that some news are spreading like wildfire through out all branges of the media (TV, Radio, News Papers etc) for days even weeks ? and some news are not considered by any media ? it is like there is a agreement between TV stations Radio, News Papers etc. to what item gets coverage, in wich ammount and for how long.
That's my experience as well.stellar said:And in my opinion, everything is symbolic in our lives, as above so below, as within so without. A messy home, for example, may be symbolic of the owners' inner state. No matter how simple or in your face the situation is, I think one can learn to 'see' something and learn a lesson. Just my experience.
Pashalis said:what I find interesting is the media attention to this.
Haven't you noticed that some news are spreading like wildfire through out all branges of the media (TV, Radio, News Papers etc) for days even weeks ? and some news are not considered by any media ? it is like there is a agreement between TV stations Radio, News Papers etc. to what item gets coverage, in wich ammount and for how long.
anart said:MK Scarlett said:anart said:[...] otherwise you're never going to move one centimeter from where you currently are.
" moving of assembly point" from Castaneda? :/ I am so sorry if it is not the good term, I do not have Castaneda in English...
No, I meant it in a more down to earth way than that. (I don't completely buy many of Castaneda's theories, by the way, though he makes several very valid observations in his books ;) ) What I meant is that unless Muxel can learn to truly question his own thinking, he will never develop past the point he is now - esoterically, spiritually, intellectually, in all ways actually. The key to learning, in my experience, is deeply understanding how ignorant you really are and how your own mind leads you astray most of the time. Until you viscerally grasp the concept that you are nothing, that you know nothing, that you understand nothing, you can't begin to move in an 'upward' direction. It's not metaphor, it's reality.
mkrnhr said:So if the sinking of Concordia is symbolic of a sinking of peace, prosperity, and health, then we are in dire straits (pun intended :P).
The Titanic disaster announced somehow great changes in the distributions of power and some dire consequences upon humanity, an given the possible time loop effect in the case of Costa Concordia, it is possible that the Universe, or something in the Universe is telling us something of the same nature? This is just a hypothesis, so wait and see, or maybe we will have other signs from other events.
What do you think?
YANSM said:In 1898, Morgan Robertson wrote a novel titled Futility. Given that it was written fourteen years before the Titanic sank, eleven years before construction on the vessel even began, the similarities between the book and the real event are eerie. The novel describes a giant boat called the Titan which everyone considers unsinkable. It is the largest ever created, and inside, it seems like a luxury hotel—just like the as yet unbuilt Titanic. Titan had only twenty lifeboats, half of what it would need should the great ship sink. The Titanic had twenty-four, also half what it needed. In the book, the Titan hits an iceberg in April four hundred miles from Newfoundland. The Titanic, years later, would do the same in the same month in the same place. The Titan sinks, and more than half of the passengers die, just as with the Titanic. The number of people on board who die in the book and the number in the future accident are nearly identical. The similarities don’t stop there. The fictional Titan and the real Titanic both had three propellers and two masts. Both had a capacity of three thousand people. Both hit the iceberg close to midnight.
Andromeda said:YANSM said:In 1898, Morgan Robertson wrote a novel titled Futility. Given that it was written fourteen years before the Titanic sank, eleven years before construction on the vessel even began, the similarities between the book and the real event are eerie. The novel describes a giant boat called the Titan which everyone considers unsinkable. It is the largest ever created, and inside, it seems like a luxury hotel—just like the as yet unbuilt Titanic. Titan had only twenty lifeboats, half of what it would need should the great ship sink. The Titanic had twenty-four, also half what it needed. In the book, the Titan hits an iceberg in April four hundred miles from Newfoundland. The Titanic, years later, would do the same in the same month in the same place. The Titan sinks, and more than half of the passengers die, just as with the Titanic. The number of people on board who die in the book and the number in the future accident are nearly identical. The similarities don’t stop there. The fictional Titan and the real Titanic both had three propellers and two masts. Both had a capacity of three thousand people. Both hit the iceberg close to midnight.
McRaney thinks that coincidences are nothing more than coincidences - but I don't think that's always correct. I guess we'll have to wait and see what happens!
Laura said:There's actually more to Andromeda's remark that just the day before we were discussing the Titanic at breakfast (in the context of McRaney's book). The next day, she and Perceval had to drive to Marseille on business and were on the waterfront admiring the giant Med cruisers and talking about how nice it would be to take a cruise. AT THAT VERY MOMENT the Concordia was going down.
Pashalis said:all these "coincidences" that happen almost daily are kind of funny.
I'm used to it now for quite some time.
It is hard to find out if there is a meaning behind them and if so wich and from wich direction it "comes from".
the universe is really communicating if you choose to listen. but again some of those coincidences could be a planed distraction from higher realms.
Laura said:But that's just one way of looking at it. Mainly, we usually can't know what such things mean ultimately, but they do get our attention and maybe that is what they are supposed to do? To make us alert and careful; that the wolf is circling, trying to find a way in, so caution is in order.
Other scripture and religious literature in which the lily symbolizes purity and chastity also helped establish the flower as an iconographic attribute of the Virgin.