I think we have a misconception regarding the terms:SAO said:Well, who says that they are not processed though?
Initially, with "raw images" I referred to the images with the same title on the Cassini/Mars Rover websites. To which extent "raw" the images are, and how NASA defines "raw", I do not know. I would call an image "raw" if it reproduces the original on the space probe without altering resolution, color, noise, etc.
So, the term "processed" I used was not accurate, because as you say, there are multiple data format conversions from Mars/Saturn to your desktop. That is a kind of processing. With "processing" I meant "preparing (enhancing) for scientific presentation" e.g. Press Image Releases.
It could be, that NASA's terminus technicus "raw" means "totally manipulated". But I regularly browse through those images and I could not find evidence of manipulation. Censorship, probable.