Dave McGowan's new series "Wagging the Moondoggie"

shellycheval

The Living Force
While many of us have been waiting for Dave to finish the ever so dark and dream destroying Laurel Canyon series, he has taken a time out to publish a new series on faking the moon landings. The following is an email I just sent to Dave and will serve as my recommendation of his latest writing:

Thank you Dave for your new series "Wagging the Moondoggie." It is definitely worth the interruption in the Laurel Canyon music scene expose (smashing another long held cherished relic of mine from the sixties about which you made me laugh while the shards were falling) and, in my opinion, stands as your funniest writing yet. Not to take anything away from the seriousness of the topic, the U.S. government faking the moon landings for forty years, (OK—just saying it is funny!) but writing humor, IMHO, is the most difficult writing to do well. To have me belly-laughing and looking for a seat belt for my office chair to keep me from rolling on the floor time and again, is a comic gift the likes of which I have not had since Dave Berry moved me to tears with his description of how, by using pop-tarts as fuel, one could turn a toaster into a flame thrower. OK, Jon Stewart’s recent FOX news juxtaposition was also hilarious, but then they’re FOX news therefore ridiculous all by them selves. You, on the other hand, took a topic so revered in American iconography that Howard Zinn wouldn’t even discuss it, and turned it into such memorable imagery as “It would appear that what was deployed by the mother ship to shuttle our guys down to the Moon was essentially an oversized Jiffy-Pop container (with the brainpower of a digital watch).”

Who in their right mind can refute this! Not me any longer. I have seen the LEM at the Smithsonian and I could not believe my eyes (literally!) that this schoolboy mock-up out of back-yard junk landed on the moon. Then, to remain comfortably in denial I thought it must be real; surely if “they” were trying to fake the moon landings they would have come up with something a little more believable looking than this collage of tinfoil and kitchen gadgets. You know—I was using reverse psychology on myself to hang onto the last one remaining event in American history that had not succumbed to the “zero to the bone” chill of conspiracy theory for me. It took you, Dave McGowan, to take my one remaining icon of U.S. ideology, one that many people continue to revere, and focus the lens of reason on it so succinctly, simply, directly and clearly that it too now resides in the dustbin of my naive national beliefs that started to fill up as the towers came down. Well done Dave.
shellycheval

Address to Dave's website http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com/
 
All I can say after reading the first 2 parts of this series is that it must be hunting season for 'sacred cows'. They're dropping like flies. This morning I would have thought like Dave says, that anyone suggesting the lunar landings were faked was loony. By the end of Part 1 this cow was on life-support. It died sometime this afternoon. "Houston, we have a problem!' Indeed. The problem IS Houston.
 
WOW! Thanks Vulcan59 and shellycheval for pointing out this article.

I watched the "live" broadcast of Apollo 11's moon landing as a young lad (my dad allowed me to stay up late to watch). Over the last year I have followed the articles on the web questioning the moon landings and did put a question mark in my mind.

I have a boxed set of the complete Apollo 11 mission (_http://02e5a89.netsolstores.com/apollo11menonthemoon.aspx). I need to look at it again with a critical eye as Dave has done. I have only read the first three parts and it really made the question mark in my mind turn into an exclamation point!

Makes me wonder how all this footage was obtained to make the dvd set if all the original footage has been lost?
 
I remember when the news came out, not headlines of course, but here and there an admission from NASA that they had "lost" the recordings of the Apollo missions. At the time I thought WOW, that will really fuel the conspiracy fire, but I had a lot of serious personal life issues I was dealing with at the time and did not devout anymore thought to it--it has just been simmering on the back burner of my mind and I have been on the fence about it until now. But, like thevenusian said, sacred cows are falling everywhere. Some reasons I think I hung on to this one so long are: the moon landing came right at the end of my childhood while I was still a serious science geek; I loved science fiction back then and here it was happening in real life; I was an Air Force wife for many years and knew enough of those big-ego, death-wish, pilots with the "right stuff," to believe they actually could do and did go to the moon, and finally, sigh . . . , it would be nice to hang on to something, but when most of the pieces of the puzzle have been filled in and the picture is clear, I can't not see what is there.
shellycheval
 
Thanks for the link to the article. I don't recall laughing so much while reading educational material. I never really believed that we landed on the moon. Like McGowan, I always questioned why we never, ever went back. I searched a couple of hoax sites but never investigated further. This article pointed out LOADS of info about this hoax that I never knew.

And the fact that all the footage was lost...gimme a break!! :lol:
 
Thanks for the URL, it was great to read. My husband and I watched the Fox documentary when it was on TV and we were amazed then. Now after reading this I am convinced.

What boggles my mind the most is how many people were involved in this hoax. Even the Soviets had to know that it's baloney. Why would the supposed enemies of the USA (at the time) keep such a secret?

Could really use the technology of that moon buggy. Just press a button, out it comes and go... Very George Jetson!
 
Thanks for posting the link! It is hilarious :rotfl:, interesting :thup:, and very informative :). It is really absurd to think that man went to the moon as described by NASA.
I look forward to the rest of McGowan's series.
 
Bluestar said:
What boggles my mind the most is how many people were involved in this hoax. Even the Soviets had to know that it's baloney. Why would the supposed enemies of the USA (at the time) keep such a secret?

It seems as the Soviets where also lying about their achievements in space. According to the German author Gerhard Wisnewski in his book One Small Step? The great moon hoax and the race to dominate earth from space, there's little evidence to prove Yuri Gagarin actually went into space other than the soviets say so. Did the americans play along for their own political reasons. It appears so.

The book also covers areas not mentioned in the McGowan series; to take one example the recovery of the returning space capsules from the moon to within a kilometre or slightly more of the recovery teams, whereas all the previous unmanned capsules had been tens or hundreds of kilemetres off target!

This book is well worth your time reading for other fascinating facts and insights (osit).
 
Really! It gives the phrase "made of space age material a brand new meaning."

With the money spent on 'landing man on the moon,' we could have by now at least, made some excellent heating/cooling systems safe from even the most extreme environments for the regular folks here on Earth. Meanwhile, sending our best space tech scientists to the Mars or Venus outposts to build beautiful cities.

The 'moon rover' looks like it had lawn chairs as seats to me....


The Mechanic said:
I never knew there was a well of lost technologies from the sixties!
 
Thanks for the heads-up. (way late on my part)

Hadn't checked Mr McGowan's site in awhile and having finally finished his newest series, it was imho very well written and informative.

The well-written aspect is related, in part, to his better use of refences and photos for explanation. Again imho much better researched than the Laurel Canyon series.

Maybe just me, but I even like his 'careful' use of profanity. :scared:

Once again looking forward to future installments.
 
I have tried several times to open Dave's page, the first time was about 1 or 2 months ago, but can't seem to be able to open it up. I followed the link given by shellycheval in the fist post of this thread, that didn't work. Then I followed Vulcan's link that lead to another thread, also tried the "wagging the moondoggie" given there, doesn't work either. Neither does "part 12" link by Vulcan59 in the post above.
Is anyone else experiencing this problem?
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom