EmeraldR
The Living Force
addiction and substance abuse come to mind here - possibly...
David Wilcock's Death
- Thread starter Noctu
- Start date
I agree with that. Seems to me Wilcock was probably under the influence of some higher dark influences too, which could easily destabilize his connection with others and reality. That may have been enough to have done him in.
I’d go as far as suggesting that he died along with the broader New Age COINTEL program that he helped create. And if people read his history, that program looked to be fundamentally about distracting from and creating a discrediting ‘body’ meant to derail attention from channeled material, and even more explicitly drawing attention away from progression of The Law of One from Ra to the C’s. He accomplished this by being repeatedly exposed as a liar, a conman, and being horrendously bad at making predictions. He had barely any credibility. Of course he had a large die-hard fan base that always believed, but outside that, his credibility had been shot. He was one of the most notable figures to turn people off from ‘channeled material’ and similar. But not just that. He was a significant vector in keeping people from finding something new in channeled material, and that is the work done here - an effort to understand the nature of reality, grow our being, and the possibility of creating a new world.
The program ran its course, pretty much did its job, and now no one cares. So it kind of makes sense that he would die along with it. Perhaps his being was to one extent or another tied into some New Age egregore or pendulum, and when it lost its life force, so did he. He became merely a dream of the past, so to speak.
What is also interesting is that the current trends of UFO/UAP research is largely what has filled in the gap with alternative audiences since the New Age has fallen out of favor. It wouldn’t surprise me if Wilcock did in fact commit suicide and this was his last attempt at being somehow relevant.
From this post:
Hmm.. Ivermectin ruins ones digestive system? Don't think so.
Penny Kelly had a interesting take on this at 21:30 in the video. She says he may have been listening to a lower level spirit being or maybe he interpreted what was said wrong. The message may have been "bath in your innate self" but because of lack of knowledge in the language of symbolism this was interpreted wrong. She explained this well, better then I can. Sounds reasonable.
Kerry Cassidy is on the war path with the people on the Beyond Mystic video, I believe this is the video she mentions here. I've been looking at comments surrounding Wilcocks death and he had a lot of followers it seems. They aren't buying the mental illness explanation.
Cassidy is still in la-la-land, I see. Wilcock is not around to 'defend himself from being called crazy' because he blew his brains out... because he was crazy.
Last edited:
Sybil
Jedi
I was following David Wilcock for years. He was a brilliant mind before the circus started around him. Truth is not black or white. He was mentally unstable, yes. He was narcissistic, yes. He had a giant ego, yes. But what struck me was his state in the last video. A man falling apart, unstable, not coherent, his eyes not symmetrical anymore. His whole skull looked deformed.
My first thought was a targeted energy weapon. No one can withstand those things. But really, it could be anything else. He might as well have killed himself, or someone shot him. Who would ever know the whole truth? And would it matter? What matters is the big show folding out around the event now. Could he be killed for disobeying? Maybe. Or did he kill himself because he was so desperate? Maybe. The disclosure community is buzzing like a beehive now. This matters only. Energy harvesting is the point. And this will produce a lot of energy to harvest.
Since he is dead, everybody can say anything about him. And those people who would actually know something will stay silent.
My first thought was a targeted energy weapon. No one can withstand those things. But really, it could be anything else. He might as well have killed himself, or someone shot him. Who would ever know the whole truth? And would it matter? What matters is the big show folding out around the event now. Could he be killed for disobeying? Maybe. Or did he kill himself because he was so desperate? Maybe. The disclosure community is buzzing like a beehive now. This matters only. Energy harvesting is the point. And this will produce a lot of energy to harvest.
Since he is dead, everybody can say anything about him. And those people who would actually know something will stay silent.
Last edited:
halogenlight02
The Force is Strong With This One
Could you elaborate on what you mean by this?
Well it is said that continual lying can cause detrimental affects to a person and he had lied and scammed for many, many years. He also could have started to believe his own lies. Maybe it all caught up with him.
I think it's a good case study of what self-delusion and lies in general will do to your ability to navigate reality over the years. "Life experiences reflect how one interacts with God."
From my experience, stubborn refusal to see reality intensifies the lessons - which means more problems, more suffering. Whether it's a natural chaos caused by delusions clashing with reality or an intentional lesson escalation by the universe (or they are one and the same), it will either be a wake-up call or, if you double down, destroy you.
It's like a self-induced transmarginal inhibition. The C's said that there will be an increase of disintegration and soul smashing.
It's always interesting how some are able to reach a "dark night of the soul" and start, painfully, waking up. Others are completely subsumed by the negative spiral to the bitter end.
I always root for people to "figure it out" because it's just nice to see someone finally open their eyes to their own predicament, take responsibility for their situation, and then watch them turn it around and ultimately thrive. And it always sucks to see someone unable to do this. And it's interesting how forgiving people can be when someone overcomes their past sins. Sometimes comically so - a villain that kills thousands in a movie becomes a good guy, and the audience somehow cheers for them.
So David's ending is doubly sad - one, that he didn't have the humility or some part inside him that could overcome the disintegration. And two, that had he done so, he likely would be forgiven for all the damage he has done over the decades to himself, the truth movement, real channeling, and all who followed him. Granted, he'd make a bunch of new enemies, but also new friends, it's just how things go. Maybe not immediately, maybe not "comically" like in the movies, but he would be forgiven if his turnaround was in fact genuine and real and lasting.
Maybe he didn't think he deserved it? Or maybe he didn't even get far enough along to realize that he did anything wrong, and thought the universe was just against him, who knows what was in his head.
From my experience, stubborn refusal to see reality intensifies the lessons - which means more problems, more suffering. Whether it's a natural chaos caused by delusions clashing with reality or an intentional lesson escalation by the universe (or they are one and the same), it will either be a wake-up call or, if you double down, destroy you.
It's like a self-induced transmarginal inhibition. The C's said that there will be an increase of disintegration and soul smashing.
It's always interesting how some are able to reach a "dark night of the soul" and start, painfully, waking up. Others are completely subsumed by the negative spiral to the bitter end.
I always root for people to "figure it out" because it's just nice to see someone finally open their eyes to their own predicament, take responsibility for their situation, and then watch them turn it around and ultimately thrive. And it always sucks to see someone unable to do this. And it's interesting how forgiving people can be when someone overcomes their past sins. Sometimes comically so - a villain that kills thousands in a movie becomes a good guy, and the audience somehow cheers for them.
So David's ending is doubly sad - one, that he didn't have the humility or some part inside him that could overcome the disintegration. And two, that had he done so, he likely would be forgiven for all the damage he has done over the decades to himself, the truth movement, real channeling, and all who followed him. Granted, he'd make a bunch of new enemies, but also new friends, it's just how things go. Maybe not immediately, maybe not "comically" like in the movies, but he would be forgiven if his turnaround was in fact genuine and real and lasting.
Maybe he didn't think he deserved it? Or maybe he didn't even get far enough along to realize that he did anything wrong, and thought the universe was just against him, who knows what was in his head.
Thank you for reminding me of the possibility of soul smashing. I do consider it now.
I regarded it as an invitation to look up some more about soul smashing in the transcripts, and I found the session of 13 September 2009 to be particularly enlightening. The whole thing is too long to quote but here is a relevant piece. I put the information that stood out to me in bold and yellow:
Now, I try to keep an open mind and think critically.
The C's said on 31 July 1999:
So for me, there is still a possibility that it was not soul smashing, or that it at least was not so black and white.
Therefore, a question to ask to the C's to verify our assumption here on the forum might simply be:
Was David Wilcock's soul smashed?
Some questions I have, assuming it was indeed soul smashing, or if the C's would answer affirmatively:
1. Was David Wilcock being tortured, which (in part) lead to the soul smashing? If yes, by what means?
2. How big was the final smashing event? What was it exactly?
3. Did David choose the "downward development path" (as per 'Darkness over Tibet')?
4. Did he choose it because of traumatic experiences?
5. If yes, were those traumatic experiences residue of a past life or karmatic?
6. If not, were they induced by STS beings?
7. What could he have done to prevent this?
8. Was David a Wanderer (as per the Ra material and the Law of One)?
9. If so, what density was he from? 6th?
10. Was he in fact a reincarnation of Edgar Cayce?
I'm operating from AND consciousness here, as in: he could have been both narcissistic as well as the reincarnation of EC.
I'm aware that some of these questions might seem silly or already answered, but I'm just trying to keep an open mind here, and as many of my teachers say: "There are no silly questions."
From my experiential knowledge with watching some of his videos, I can say that I was turned off by them and sceptical but I also don't want to operate from blind spots, assumptions, or bias.
Hence these ponderings.
Thank you.
I regarded it as an invitation to look up some more about soul smashing in the transcripts, and I found the session of 13 September 2009 to be particularly enlightening. The whole thing is too long to quote but here is a relevant piece. I put the information that stood out to me in bold and yellow:
Now, I try to keep an open mind and think critically.
The C's said on 31 July 1999:
So for me, there is still a possibility that it was not soul smashing, or that it at least was not so black and white.
Therefore, a question to ask to the C's to verify our assumption here on the forum might simply be:
Was David Wilcock's soul smashed?
Some questions I have, assuming it was indeed soul smashing, or if the C's would answer affirmatively:
1. Was David Wilcock being tortured, which (in part) lead to the soul smashing? If yes, by what means?
2. How big was the final smashing event? What was it exactly?
3. Did David choose the "downward development path" (as per 'Darkness over Tibet')?
4. Did he choose it because of traumatic experiences?
5. If yes, were those traumatic experiences residue of a past life or karmatic?
6. If not, were they induced by STS beings?
7. What could he have done to prevent this?
8. Was David a Wanderer (as per the Ra material and the Law of One)?
9. If so, what density was he from? 6th?
10. Was he in fact a reincarnation of Edgar Cayce?
I'm operating from AND consciousness here, as in: he could have been both narcissistic as well as the reincarnation of EC.
I'm aware that some of these questions might seem silly or already answered, but I'm just trying to keep an open mind here, and as many of my teachers say: "There are no silly questions."
From my experiential knowledge with watching some of his videos, I can say that I was turned off by them and sceptical but I also don't want to operate from blind spots, assumptions, or bias.
Hence these ponderings.
Thank you.
Last edited:
Trending content
-
-
-
Thread 'Coronavirus Pandemic: Apocalypse Now! Or exaggerated scare story?'
- wanderingthomas
Replies: 30K
