palestine
Jedi Master
Hello,
As the title suggests, I would like to start a discussion about the Hamas attack - specifically one point - and submit it to members for debate, and possible eligibility for a futre session as a question.
The question is: "How come that we never heard any Palestinian two cents about the Hamas attack of October 7".
My reasoning goes as follows:
A 2002 article features:
Palestinians arrest al-Qaeda ‘poseurs’ (2002) :
And so... If I was a Palestinian in Gaza, the above would have become a "common factor around". Palestinians should know, since this event, that such things are taking place. It would become main stream in the streets of Gaza... First thing they would say in case of "a terrorist event featuring Palestinians" would be the 2002 occurence...
But here it is... Never have I heard of any single Palestinian statement including the exact words "Hamas attack" - since October 7.
I believe that it is reasonable than to expect some "takes", such as:
This follows up the C session in which it has been stated that the Hamas attack was an inside job. Digging into it, at some time, made me realize that indeed, Palestinians are NOT the Hamas. It appears that "genuine Palestinian resistance" is something of the past.
And so, I would reasonably expect to have been hearing one guy or two, bursting in anger, against those so-called Palestinian representatives"... who literally triggered the levelling down of Gaza and the extermination, on camera, of 300'000 people - 70% of women and kids.
But no. There hasn't been any testimony of anger against the Hamas- or at least not enough. Again, we should reasonably expect a higher proportion of such statements than anything else.
And so.
Another problem which popped up in my research is that of the actual testimonies. There are. Many. And they exclusively say the same thing:
Thinking about this, made me hypothesize that objective two cents would be present in Arabian. Arabian media plateforms, etc... But. Seems that "The Electronic Intifada" has been extensively relaying Palestinian voices - so they should have been in touch with direct Arabian statements.
Let me know what you think - of course, I would be eager to be suggested reasons to explain the above. I have several, but I will keep those for later discussion with pleasure!
Thank you! Since the C session mentioning an inside job, I have been spectating those events with another lens.
As the title suggests, I would like to start a discussion about the Hamas attack - specifically one point - and submit it to members for debate, and possible eligibility for a futre session as a question.
The question is: "How come that we never heard any Palestinian two cents about the Hamas attack of October 7".
My reasoning goes as follows:
A 2002 article features:
Palestinians arrest al-Qaeda ‘poseurs’ (2002) :
“The Palestinian Authority arrested a group of collaborators who confessed they were working for Israel, posing as al-Qaeda operatives in the Palestinian territories ,” said the official, on condition of anonymity.
He said the alleged collaborators sought to “discredit the Palestinian people, justify every Israeli crime and provide [Israel with] reasons to carry out a new [military] aggression in the Gaza Strip.”
And so... If I was a Palestinian in Gaza, the above would have become a "common factor around". Palestinians should know, since this event, that such things are taking place. It would become main stream in the streets of Gaza... First thing they would say in case of "a terrorist event featuring Palestinians" would be the 2002 occurence...
But here it is... Never have I heard of any single Palestinian statement including the exact words "Hamas attack" - since October 7.
I believe that it is reasonable than to expect some "takes", such as:
- Well, I don't know, that Hamas attack.. It made all become destroyed
- Oh! Those idiots! I lost all after this attack
- Guys! It's not us who did that! The "Hamas" is NOT Palestinians!
This follows up the C session in which it has been stated that the Hamas attack was an inside job. Digging into it, at some time, made me realize that indeed, Palestinians are NOT the Hamas. It appears that "genuine Palestinian resistance" is something of the past.
And so, I would reasonably expect to have been hearing one guy or two, bursting in anger, against those so-called Palestinian representatives"... who literally triggered the levelling down of Gaza and the extermination, on camera, of 300'000 people - 70% of women and kids.
But no. There hasn't been any testimony of anger against the Hamas- or at least not enough. Again, we should reasonably expect a higher proportion of such statements than anything else.
And so.
Another problem which popped up in my research is that of the actual testimonies. There are. Many. And they exclusively say the same thing:
- And they killed my cousin. And they killed my aunt (...)
- I lost 12 family members since the invasion of Gaza
- ...
Thinking about this, made me hypothesize that objective two cents would be present in Arabian. Arabian media plateforms, etc... But. Seems that "The Electronic Intifada" has been extensively relaying Palestinian voices - so they should have been in touch with direct Arabian statements.
Let me know what you think - of course, I would be eager to be suggested reasons to explain the above. I have several, but I will keep those for later discussion with pleasure!
Thank you! Since the C session mentioning an inside job, I have been spectating those events with another lens.