Deconstructing Gurdjieff: Biography of a Spiritual Magician by Tobias Churton

Altair

Ambassador
Ambassador
FOTCM Member
I stumbled upon a new book by Tobias Churton Deconstructing Gurdjieff: Biography of a Spiritual Magician and I'm not sure whether it's worth reading. I couldn't find much about him neither on the forum nor on the internet. From the book description:

Beyond Meetings with Remarkable Men into the truth behind the self-crafted mythology of Gurdjieff’s life

• Reveals evidence that Gurdjieff was a secret Freemason ( :huh:), relying on hypnotism, psychic research and spiritualism

• Explores the profound influence of the Yezidis, esoteric Christianity, and the “gnostics” of Islam, the Sufis, on Gurdjieff’s Fourth Way teachings and the “Work”

• Uncovers the truth behind Gurdjieff’s relations with Aleister Crowley

• Accurately dates Gurdjieff’s real activities, particularly his enigmatic early life

In November 1949, architect Frank Lloyd Wright announced the death of “the greatest man in the world,” yet few knew who he was talking about. Enigmatic, misunderstood, declared a charlatan, and recently dubbed “the Rasputin who inspired Mary Poppins,” Gurdjieff’s life has become a legend. But who really was George Ivanovich Gurdjieff?

Employing the latest research and discoveries, including previously unpublished reminiscences of the real man, Tobias Churton investigates the truth beneath the self-crafted mythology of Gurdjieff’s life recounted in Meetings with Remarkable Men. He examines his controversial birthdate, his father’s background, and his relationship with his private tutor Dean Borshch, revealing a perilous childhood in a Pontic Greek family, persecuted by Turks, forced to migrate to Georgia and Armenia, only to grow up amid more war, persecution, genocide, and revolt. Placing Gurdjieff in the true context of his times, Churton explores Gurdjieff’s roles in esoteric movements taking root in the Russian Empire and in epic imperial construction projects in the Kars Oblast, Transcaucasia, and central Asia. He reveals Gurdjieff’s sources for his transformative philosophy, his early interest in hypnosis, magic, Theosophy, and spiritualism, and the profound influence of the Yezidis and the Sufis, the “gnostics” of Islam, on Gurdjieff’s Fourth Way teachings and the “Work.” Churton also explores Gurdjieff’s ties to Freemasonry and his relationships with other spiritual teachers and philosophers of the age, such as Madame Blavatsky, Frank Lloyd Wright, and Aleister Crowley, dispelling the myth that Gurdjieff forcibly expelled the “Great Beast” from his Institute.

Showing how Gurdjieff deliberately re-shaped elements of his life as parables of his system, Churton explains how he didn’t want people to follow his footsteps but to find their own, to wake up from the hypnosis that drives us blindly through life. Offering a vital understanding of the man who asked “How many of you are really alive?” the author reveals the continuing importance of Gurdjieff’s philosophy for the awakening of

What do we know about Tobias Churton?
 
Interesting they should mention the meeting with Aleister creepy Crowley.

It is well covered in a book called the Harmonius Circle.
By James Webb,
The Book itself is very good ,
But has a strange final 5 pages or so , in which WEBB,
appears to dismiss everything he has already written,

Anyway , a quick Search bought me to this thread,
and a post by Laura on
"The Strange Death" of James Webb.
reply 74,
https://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,215.msg90682.html#msg90682

In my experience of the web, ( not webb )
Dark Occultists deeply resent the story of Gurdgieff,
"OWNING" Crowley,
and so
Predictably try to smear his name by claiming him as one of their own..
However , where I have seen this , there is always a Link to a work by Crowley ,
but Never a work by Gurdjieff !!
Maybe they dont really want people comparing them ,

I have a PDF copy of harmonious circle I can lend to anyone , if they drop me a PM
 
I too would like to know about more about the specific influences on Gurdjieffs knowledge, especially in regards to the Yezidic and Sufi ones. Like with Blavatsky, authors of that time period tend to not go into detail about what exactly their source were, names and dates you could research etc...

But a brief look at the author of that book you linked to makes me suspicious that there might not be much credibility to this "biography" of Gurdjieff.

_http://tobiaschurton.com/4_Books.html

Looking at his other books, he seems to have produced an awful lot of books on various "occult" subjects, with a particular fixation on sex and mystery. Judging by the amount of hot marketing words used, it looks like he primarily wants to make money using the sex/occult/secret orders angle and considering the amount of people he has written biographies about, I'd doubt the quality of his research.
The covers of his books about Crowley also reveal that he seems to have a rather high opinion of that creep, so if he can't tell that there was something seriously wrong with that guy, I don't know how insightful his book on Gurdjieff could be!

I haven't read his books though, so I might be wrong. Just not getting the impression that a lot of reliable information could be found in his works.
 
I recently read "The Fellowship: The Untold Story of Frank Lloyd Wright and the Taliesin Fellowship".
It's probably the definitive work on the FLW gurdjieff connection. If I remember right it's co-authored by two academics with doctorate degrees, I believe one more focus on spirituality/philosophy and one on history/architecture. It's well foot-noted but also a fantastic read, and it's impressive how they manage to wrap their minds around G.

This book featured gurdjieff prominently but mainly in connection with FLW's third wife, who was with gurdjieff in Tiflis, in 1918. FLW is also an interesting guy, he was a christian more or less. His father was deeply involved in a certain christian revival movement, and this had influence on him. But FLW, had three marriages. He left his first wife, and their children, quite early on and suddenly -- and it wasn't on great terms, and cannot be thought of positively. This was at a time, in America, where you really can't be doing this kind of behavoir. And FLW, was gossiped about. But I suppose for some men, to be be married three times, is not a sinful thing. I mean -- for most men, it probably is. For most men it indicates a non-trivial character flaw, but for some doesn't necessarily. And FLW finally found his match with Olgivana, his third wife.
Gurdjieff said he slept with over 100 women, he bragged about this - when he visited with the Wright's. And some people believed him. Certainly, he surrounded himself with young girls, but they were dancers primarily, I believe. When G was putting on the performances, prior to 1924. How many testimonies do we have besides gurdjieff's own? There is some, but I don't think anyone can substantiate G's claim. And probably -- I think -- he was just being provocative to get a reaction. FLW and G never got along -- in their encounters. You had to see beyond his act which Oglivanna unflaggingly did, yet she could not even convince her husband. From afar, FLW tolerated and even admired G's work, but he couldn't stand him in close quarters.
I kind of came to accept FLW's transgressions, I think in a similar way I do for Gurdjieff. FLW was an instinctive man, prone to rages, and had difficulty with emotions. He was not Gurdjieff in the slightest, but still, he lived one stair-step above most men. Both Nott's when they visited Taliesen, in the middle of WW2, had very fond recollections of the place. At the time, FLW had a dozen or two aprentices at the estate. Significantly -- They compared it to the Prieuré. Strangly, when FWL passed, life became sort of a nightmare there. Olgivanna went somewhat crazy; I had come to think over the course of the book, she was the driving force for the rich life at Taliesen, but probably just as much it was FLW.
 
Eulenspiegel said:
I too would like to know about more about the specific influences on Gurdjieffs knowledge, especially in regards to the Yezidic and Sufi ones. Like with Blavatsky, authors of that time period tend to not go into detail about what exactly their source were, names and dates you could research etc...

But a brief look at the author of that book you linked to makes me suspicious that there might not be much credibility to this "biography" of Gurdjieff.

_http://tobiaschurton.com/4_Books.html

Looking at his other books, he seems to have produced an awful lot of books on various "occult" subjects, with a particular fixation on sex and mystery. Judging by the amount of hot marketing words used, it looks like he primarily wants to make money using the sex/occult/secret orders angle and considering the amount of people he has written biographies about, I'd doubt the quality of his research.
The covers of his books about Crowley also reveal that he seems to have a rather high opinion of that creep, so if he can't tell that there was something seriously wrong with that guy, I don't know how insightful his book on Gurdjieff could be!

I haven't read his books though, so I might be wrong. Just not getting the impression that a lot of reliable information could be found in his works.

Yeah, it was my impression, too. His admiration with Crowley is suspicious. I can recommend you this short book by John Bennett Gurdjieff: Ursprung und Hintergrund seiner Lehre (sorry, I can't find the title in English) to get to know more about the background of his teachings.
 
Altair said:
Yeah, it was my impression, too. His admiration with Crowley is suspicious. I can recommend you this short book by John Bennett Gurdjieff: Ursprung und Hintergrund seiner Lehre (sorry, I can't find the title in English) to get to know more about the background of his teachings.

Thank you very much! I already ordered that book since German is my mother tongue. The original English title of Bennett's book is <Gurdjieff: A Very Great Enigma>
 
Eulenspiegel said:
Looking at his other books, he seems to have produced an awful lot of books on various "occult" subjects, with a particular fixation on sex and mystery.

Well a flag pops up right there. So often the ideas of 'sex and mystery' are hooked up together the notion of 'kudalini' energy and G’s views on that were very different to almost every other source you come across on the subject. G was very firm and insistent that this kind of thing is not desirable at all, and that if anything that it only make matters worse and man falls deeper into sleep, al the while imagining he is awakening.

There’s a thread on the theme here with some useful quotes to illustrate the point:

[quote author=CassWiki]Kundalini

Esoteric teaching on kundalini and its meaning varies greatly from source to source. All sources agree that this is a sort of force or effect that is localized at the base of the spine and can be activated either spontaneously or through deliberate exercises.

Kundalini is said to rise from the first chakra, along the spine, possibly all the way to the crown chakra. It is sometimes compared to a serpent that lies coiled at the base of the spine. In most teachings, awakening this serpent is claimed to bring great powers and benefits.

George Gurdjieff's view on the matter differs from most sources. He agrees that such a thing exists but teaches that it is the source of false imaginings, an actual bane of man, the remnant of the ill-famed 'organ kundabuffer' which is discussed extensively in Beelzebub's Tales to His Grandson. Kundalini is in effect the spell by which the 'evil magician' has hypnotized man to believe himself to be a magician while in truth he remains a sheep. Awakening the kundalini causes man to plunge deeper into illusion and is ruinous to the Work, says Gurdjieff.

The kundalini is often compared to a serpent, maybe because of the undulating sensation that can be felt along the spine when doing certain exercises. Boris Mouravieff writes that this is what the serpent of Genesis actually represents. [/quote]

and here’s G on the subject from the same thread:

[quote author=In Search of the Miraculous]In so-called 'occult' literature you have probably met with the expression 'Kundalini,' 'the fire of Kundalini,' or the 'serpent of Kundalini.'

This expression is often used to designate some kind of strange force which is present in man and which can be awakened. But none of the known theories gives the right explanation of the force of Kundalini.

Sometimes it is connected with sex, with sex energy, that is with the idea of the possibility of using sex energy for other purposes. This latter is entirely wrong because Kundalini can be in anything. And above all, Kundalini is not anything desirable or useful for man's development.

It is very curious how these occultists have got hold of the word from somewhere but have completely altered its meaning and from a very dangerous and terrible thing have made something to be hoped for and to be awaited as some blessing. In reality Kundalini is the power of imagination, the power of fantasy, which takes the place of a real function.

When a man dreams instead of acting, when his dreams take the place of reality, when a man imagines himself to be an eagle, a lion, or a magician, it is the force of Kundalini acting in him. Kundalini can act in all centers and with its help all the centers can be satisfied with the imaginary instead of the real. A sheep which considers itself a lion or a magician lives under the power of Kundalini. Kundalini is a force put into men in order to keep them in their present state. If men could really see their true position and could understand all the horror of it, they would be unable to remain where they are even for one second. They would begin to seek a way out and they would quickly find it, because there is a way out; but men fail to see it simply because they are hypnotized.

Kundalini is the force that keeps them in a hypnotic state. 'To awaken' for man means to be 'dehypnotized. ' In this lies the chief difficulty and in this also lies the guarantee of its possibility, for there is no organic reason for sleep and man can awaken.

Theoretically he can, but practically it is almost impossible because as soon as a man awakens for a moment and opens his eyes, all the forces that caused him to fall asleep begin to act upon him with tenfold energy and he immediately falls asleep again, very often dreaming that he is awake or is awakening. There are certain states in ordinary sleep in which a man wants to awaken but cannot. He tells himself that he is awake but, in reality, he continues to sleep-and this can happen several times before he finally awakes. But in ordinary sleep, once he is awake, he is in a different state; in hypnotic sleep the case is otherwise; there are no objective characteristics, at any rate not at the beginning of awakening; a man cannot pinch himself in order to make sure that he is not asleep.

And if, which God forbid, a man has heard anything about objective characteristics, Kundalini at once transforms it all into imagination and dreams.

Only a man who fully realizes the difficulty of awakening can understand the necessity of long and hard work in order to awake. [/quote]

I think a lot of good people can easily get sucked into this line of thinking, and deepen their illusions, especially on the themes Churton is preoccupied with, if that’s the case. In terms of the framework we study within here too, worth keeping in mind that those forms of illusion play very well for 4d STS, a whole lot of emotional / sexual energy being siphoned off to 4d by people thinking they’re raising their frequency or level of consciousness through it. So worth pondering the themes and different sources take on it within the STS/STO framework I think. I haven’t read Churton, but that in mind you wonder whether any subtle (but possibly very important) twists are being added to Gs ideas and teachings. I mean why the heck put the words "spiritual magician" into the title for starters!
 
Eulenspiegel said:
Altair said:
Yeah, it was my impression, too. His admiration with Crowley is suspicious. I can recommend you this short book by John Bennett Gurdjieff: Ursprung und Hintergrund seiner Lehre (sorry, I can't find the title in English) to get to know more about the background of his teachings.

Thank you very much! I already ordered that book since German is my mother tongue. The original English title of Bennett's book is <Gurdjieff: A Very Great Enigma>

English title for Bennett's book in circulation: "Gurdjieff: Making a New World".
 
Back
Top Bottom