B
buelltonsux
Guest
did you make it to wikipedia? i get more disapointed with this stress escalating site every day.
_http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimethyltryptamine
_http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimethyltryptamine
buelltonsux said:The neurotransmitter 5-MeO-DMT is normally only active when we are in the womb and in the first months of our lives.
This Wikipedia page is about DMT, and in the first paragraph we find:buelltonsux said:did you make it to wikipedia? i get more disapointed with this stress escalating site every day.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimethyltryptamine
Wikipedia said:Dimethyltryptamine (DMT), also known as N,N-dimethyltryptamine, is a psychedelic tryptamine. It is not to be confused with 5-MeO-DMT...
I imagine it is quite 'stress escalating' to be shown that what one believes is 'good' is actually more akin to 'poison'. Dreaming that you're making progress via hallucinations and drug use in your sleep is stress free, no?buelltonsux said:i get more disapointed with this stress escalating site every day.
You clearly have no idea what you're talking about. Are you implying that taking hallucinogens transports you to 4D - that it is a shortcut - that it is the way to go?buelltonsux said:right. so how's waiting for the wave to sweep you into 4D?
From the rules page:Racer_Unknown said:Dear Moderator(s):
I don't understand what I did wrong?
It was actually your description of using such that goes against forum rules. Unfortunately, this is one area where this forum errs on the side of 'zero tolerance'.ru said:As I explained in one of my recent posts, I am new to the forum and are still learning my way. I thought I had read the rules correctly before posting and thought my posts, including the one today related to DMT/ psychoactive compounds as "psychological amplifiers," met the guidelines?
If you hold the forum in such high esteem, then it should be a very simple task to abide by the rules.ur said:One of the things that attracted me to this forum is that it looks at many subjects in an effort to get at the Truth - of what might be. In reading over the posts to this section, I thought I had some data to share that some of you may appreciate as far as knowledge/understanding is concerned. After all, we're here to exchange ideas views and information to come to some agreement of again, what might be or the way things might really be as opposed to how they are thought to be... or should be. Correct?
See above.ur said:I would appreciate if the moderator that removed/deleted my post, which I took the time and effort and love to write clearly and intelligibly, would explain what was it that I wrote that prompted such reaction?
See above.ur said:Deletion? Was it recommending one of Marciniak's books a no-no? If so, why? I know the C's recommend the Pleidian material. So am a bit confused.
Taking the plunge is usually quite beneficial, and hopefully you will receive this explanation in the spirit with which it is offered.ur said:I like this forum. One of the few, if not the only one on the net that is not either run by the PTB or worse, Useful Idiots. At least this is my opinion from my years reading the SOTT team/Laura's stuff. It is why I decided to "take the plunge" and joined. As a whole you are an intelligent group of people. And are not here to "vector" perception in favor of subjective thinking. Which again it's why I joined.
Anyway, thank you for your time and patience to read over our words/posts moderators.
.Anart said:"...this is one area where this forum errs on the side of 'zero tolerance'... This actually was explained to you when the initial note was posted about why your post was deleted. You then re-posted the original material, which, again, prompted its deletion. Is there a reason you ignored the moderator's note and reposted the original material?
.Anart said:As such, it is necessary to stay very far away from any subject matter that could be construed as supporting or endorsing illegal activity in any way whatsoever. This has been previously discussed at length on the forum
.Anart said:Taking the plunge is usually quite beneficial, and hopefully you will receive this explanation in the spirit with which it is offered
Hi Laura. Given the "Pepin case" I can imagine what the "Pepin types" could and WOULD do if the moderators/ administrators weren't careful. It is unfortunate but it's the truth. It is a crying shame, really, that Truthful data about subjects like entheogens can't be discussed in an intelligent manner and in a forum like this - that gets at the truth or as close to objective reality as possible, no matter where it leads. But again I understand. But please also understand that when I wrote what I shared (the post that was deleted) I did so thinking I had very carefully followed the rules. (BTW Laura as an aside and with all due respect, in reading over a section of your book, The Secret History of the World, I noticed a *small* "flaw" for lack of a better word when discussing the pharmacology of a particular entheogen. Anyone that truly knows the field would catch it immediately, like I have. If you agree with what I can point out to you, maybe you could fix this for another edition of Secret History of the World. Is there a way I could *privately* point this out to you? (like someone's email?) Again, it is minor but noticible to someone like say, Rick Strassman (The Spirit Molecule) or Jeremy Narby (The Cosmic Serpent). Not that I am in any way comparing myself to them. (I hope this is not construed as me "determining the "needs" of another!")Laura said:Racer, so far I enjoy your posts, but please note what anart has written above. If you value this forum, then please help us to protect it. You can talk about anything, if you write about it in an un-twistable way, keeping the position of the forum always uppermost in mind