Aragorn said:
So, when you notice that there's a obstruction at some part of your (or your clients) body, where the energy doesn't flow through, you simply must 'short circuit the grid' by placing your hands at that particular spot. It's like 'precision melting' of the cold/stiff spot. Different practitioners have different ways of finding or feeling these blockades. To me it usually feels like the air is denser above that spot, or that there's a 'bump' in the air. So, the hands are a very good tool for analyzing too!
I'm no expert but in electronics, you generally can't fix something by breaking it again. That is unless you plan on rebuilding it. And then, why destroy it? Why not reuse the parts?
Laura said something about hypnotherapy, it is like carrying someone. I wonder if perhaps the same applies here to an extent? Although if the issues are biological or having to do with toxins, perhaps "melting" the area will allow the body to process those toxins when it rebuilds. Or perhaps some things are those that are set in stone during childhood or before birth, and perhaps reiki can help with that, things that the subject could not change themselves.
It occurs to me that reiki, hypnosis etc. may help someone survive 3D or get to a higher D, but ultimately all energy is conserved, and a person must tow their own weight.
Does this make sense?
It just occurred to me that perhaps "short circuit" really is a good analogy. I imagine lots of neurons connected, and the way they are connected is supporting say a repressed memory, or an addiction, or some negative thing. The reiki then provides the necessary "inspiration" or energy which exposes the negativity of the wiring (it provides a set of input not previously experienced, which obviates the inappropriate wiring). Now that the cells receive negative feedback from the current scheme, their natural reaction to retract the current wiring scheme and start from scratch. Just like if you build a circuit and it doesn't work, you just cut all the wires and put it back together a different way. Except in neural nets it would be like "short circuiting" all of the neurons together, and resetting (discharging, forgetting...) the initial programming.
One exception is if it is not the current circuit that is the problem, and it is other peripheral circuits connected to it which lead up to the problem. If the surrounding circuitry continually creates the conditions to undermine or sabotage the circuit, no amount of rebuilding will help.
One thing that worries me is that, if the entire idea of the circuit is wrong, parts of the circuit will always keep going out no matter how much fixing or resetting you do. It's like an old computer. It always eventually stops working, although if you hit the reset button it will work for some time. What is important is that watching the failure carefully often allows you to determine what is wrong with the overall design. If you keep pushing the reset button on the other hand, each time, say the hard drive gets turned off in the middle of writing something. Things get corrupted, and this causes more things to break. If you keep hitting the reset button when something goes wrong, you may never figure out what's causing the problem in the first place, and eventually it will stop working altogether.
Am I even half sensible?