Earthquake in quebec Canada

Laurentien2

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
Magnitude 3.8 - ONTARIO-QUEBEC BORDER REGION, CANADA
2010 February 28 03:51:24 UTC

* Details
* Summary
* Maps
* Scientific & Technical

Earthquake Details
Magnitude 3.8
Date-Time

* Sunday, February 28, 2010 at 03:51:24 UTC
* Saturday, February 27, 2010 at 10:51:24 PM at epicenter
* Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 45.726°N, 74.456°W
Depth 7 km (4.3 miles)
Region ONTARIO-QUEBEC BORDER REGION, CANADA
Distances

* 36 km (22 miles) W (261°) from Saint-Jérôme, Québec, Canada
* 38 km (23 miles) W (280°) from Mirabel, Québec, Canada
* 47 km (29 miles) WNW (293°) from Saint-Eustache, Québec, Canada
* 60 km (37 miles) WNW (289°) from Laval, Québec, Canada
* 73 km (45 miles) WNW (289°) from Montréal, Québec, Canada

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 0.6 km (0.4 miles); depth +/- 0.7 km (0.4 miles)
Parameters NST= 26, Nph= 53, Dmin=35 km, Rmss=0.31 sec, Gp=144°,
M-type=duration magnitude (Md), Version=1
Source

* Lamont-Doherty Cooperative Seismographic Network (LCSN)

Event ID ld1025855

* This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.
* Did you feel it? Report shaking and damage at your location. You can also view a map displaying accumulated data from your report and others.
 
As me and my wife were watching the new before going to bed last night, came that sound as if a train was passing by. First I thought that it was a snowplough but the noise and vibration was to loud, I opened the window thinking it may be a low flying plane but, as i looked outside the noise and vibration slowly stopped. I said to my wife it must have been and earthquake as there was no plane in the sky or snowplough in the vicinity of our house. The epicenter is a few kilometer from where we live and earthquake of that magnitude are very rare but no unseemly. For me, it is a first time since I moved in the region 15 years ago.
 
:scared:

I'm glad you are OK! Fortunately it wasn't that strong.
 
It is true, its a very rare event here ... ; to be honest I haven't felt anything at all, probably because I'm 80km away from the epicenter. And then again, 3.8 is a small one ... nevertheless intriguing.

Thks for the info Laurentien.
 
Another quake in the region, about the same location as the previous one 2 weeks ago. This one magnitude 3.3 at 8:09 this morning. I was at the computer reading Sott when I felt the vibration and the sound wave. I called my wife at work to check if she felt it. She didn't but I just checked the report for today on Natural Resources Canada site and there it is. I checked the data for the last 5 years and there are usually 3 to 5 earthquake a year but mostly under magnitude 3. We had 3 in the last 2 weeks.(see enhances one bellow) Something is definitely moving along the outaouais river, a know fault line in western Quebec. Here is the link for the latest info on earthquake in the region http://earthquakescanada.nrcan.gc.ca/recent_eq/index_e.php


2010-03-10: M=3.3 - 11 km WNW of Lachute, QC - felt
More information on ... nearby locations

Earthquake Information
Wednesday March 10, 2010
Local Time: 08:09:03 EST
Magnitude: 3.3 MN
Latitude: 45.72 North
Longitude: 74.44 West
UT Date
and Time: 2010-03-10
13:09:03 UT


Significant Earthquake Reports

* 2010-03-10: M=3.3 - 11 km WNW of Lachute, QC - felt
* 2010-03-10: M=3.1 - 12 km SW of La Malbaie, QC - felt
* 2010-03-06: M=3.2 - 44 km N of Buckingham, QC - felt
* 2010-03-06: M=3.1 - 15 km NNE of Beaupre, QC - felt
* 2010-02-27: M=3.9 - 13 km WNW of Lachute, QC - felt
 
Hello Laurentian,
thanx for the info. After Canada beat the US for the gold, I made a comment to my friend "watch now, Ottawa is gonna get hit by a earthquake for winning the game! Like we didn't learn from Haiti!"
So what does it mean to have all those earthquakes happening like that? Is that common? Do you think the guys running the earthquake machines are hockey fans? Its a weird thing to even propose, I cant even believe I am considering it. If I take the entirity of information I/we have on what the PTB are capable of..... this line of questioning comes into play. Although it is certainly something I cant see me bringing up around the water cooler.
Ok, so I just double checked to make sure and yes, it was the 28th they won gold.

Too weird,
Cheers,
Harold
 
Do you think the guys running the earthquake machines are hockey fans?

Harold, have you read this tread http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=16603.msg143734#msg143734, if not you may like to do so before pointing an accusing finger toward "them". By "them" I mean the PTB and not the U.S. and no I don't think that those who possess and control such technology are hockey fans but I read somewhere that they love to play chess and golf. ;) There is a lot going on in the sky, on the ground and down bellow as well as in the others density, we are in for a interesting ride Harold be it to learn or to despair, it will be determine by each individual.
 
Hi again. There are allot of threads on HAARP here also, I personally have not read a single piece on the PTB being linked to playing chess, Golf as a back drop maybe, although I do know from mass media, that the PTB is seen out playing on the golf course. Like Bush and Clinton for example. I have seen PTB at hockey games, like Harper for example. For me all information is worth a look. If one wants to say 'the earthquakes in Canada on and around the 28th of Feb. 2010, that occurred just after Canada won the gold medal game are pure coincidence.' Is definitely out of context in your average water cooler conversation. Any comment linking 'earthquake machines' and the gold medal game on the 28th of March, 2010, would be seen as absurd in any average situation.
But in the context of a forum where facts are paramount to conclusions, I find it acceptable to bring to light the fact that these two seemingly separate events did occur together. Combine that with the overwhelming amounts of information available, describing the PTB as very 'poor sports' and so forth.
That's all.
If one chooses to limit their beliefs and not go down that road, so be it. But the facts do stand alone and speak for themselves. They really do not need me or anyone else to either agree or deny that fact that they are facts. Similar to the fact that some of the communication's with the 'C's' and the information they provide stand alone as fact. Not without allot of scrutiny, still the fact is that some of what they say is factual. If it wasn't we all would not be on this site. As far as I can tell, this site is here because enough information has come to light from the 'C's' as to garner further scrutiny. The one thing I have learned so far on this forum, is to assume nothing and prove as much as possible.

So when I think about sporting events being 4d drive-in's and energy sucking orgies. These thoughts are greatly influenced by some research starting with Homer's 'Iliad' where the 'spirit' of the Olympics made its first appearance. "Immortal horses they are, Poseidon gave them himself to my father Peleus, Peleus passed them on to me." Anyways looks like reports of these 4d beings 'influencing' us mere mortals in the very first 'Olympic' games might make one look for information, any information linking the Olympics to 'strange' and 'weird' events.

I hope I have made my point clearer. That is my intention.
Cheers,
Harold
 
Harold said:
Hello Laurentian,
thanx for the info. After Canada beat the US for the gold, I made a comment to my friend "watch now, Ottawa is gonna get hit by a earthquake for winning the game! Like we didn't learn from Haiti!"
So what does it mean to have all those earthquakes happening like that?

[...]

But in the context of a forum where facts are paramount to conclusions, I find it acceptable to bring to light the fact that these two seemingly separate events did occur together. Combine that with the overwhelming amounts of information available, describing the PTB as very 'poor sports' and so forth.
Harold, I think it's good to research and "think outside the box", but I know from my own experience that sometimes one can try to see something that isn't there. And if in those cases, again speaking from own experience, one gets offended by others disagreeing or pointing out flaws in ones theory then one is not seeing clearly the mode of behaviour of one self. Now, when you base your theory on one coincidence only (the hockey gold and the earthquake) some more evidence is clearly needed to form even a working theory. You probably agree that there is a huge amount of research and "roads" that are being followed by different people on this forum. I don't think it is possible or even wise for members to go investigate every little coincidence, especially if the "ingredients" are meager as in this case. But I think many would be happy to hear more about your theory and the help with the research, if you first research it a bit more your self and provide a little bit more "meat around the bone".

In case you haven't read the "numerology thing" by Umberto Eco I think it could give you some food for thought:

Amid all the nonsense there are some unimpeachable truths... I invite you to go and measure [an arbitrarily selected, but specific] kiosk. you will see that the length of the counter is one hundred and forty-nine centimeters - in other words, one hundred-billionth of the distance between the earth and the sun. The height at the rear, one hundred and seventy-six centimeters, divided by the width of the window, fifty-six centimeters, is 3.14. The height at the front is nineteen decimeters, equal, in other words, to the number of years of the Greek lunar cycle. The sum of the heights of the two front corners is one hundred and ninety times two plus one hundred and seventy-six times two, which equals seven hundred and thirty-two, the date of the victory at Poitiers. The thickness of the counter is 3.10 centimeters, and the width of the cornice of the window is 8.8 centimeters. Replacing the numbers before the decimals by the corresponding letters of the alphabet, we obtain C for ten and H for eight, or C10H8, which is the formula for naphthalene. ...With numbers you can do anything you like. Suppose I have the sacred number 9 and I want to get the number 1314, date of the execution of Jacques de Molay - a date dear to anyone who professes devotion to the Templar tradition of knighthood.

...Multiply nine by one hundred and forty-six, the fateful day of the destruction of Carthage. How did I arrive at this? I divided thirteen hundred and fourteen by two, by three, et cetera, until I found a satisfying date. I could also have divided thirteen hundred and fourteen by 6.28, the double of 3.14, and I would have got two hundred and nine. That is the year Attalus I, king of Pergamon, ascended the throne. You see? ...The universe is a great symphony of numerical correspondences... numbers and their symbolisms provide a path to special knowledge. But if the world, below and above, is a system of correspondences where tout se tient, it's natural for the [lottery] kiosk and the pyramid, both works of man, to reproduce in their structure, unconsciously, the harmonies of the cosmos. [Foucault's Pendulum, Eco, 1988, pp.288, 289]
 
Hello, good morning, Harold here.

You probably agree that there is a huge amount of research and "roads" that are being followed by different people on this forum. I don't think it is possible or even wise for members to go investigate every little coincidence, especially if the "ingredients" are meager as in this case.

Yes I agree.... I saw the Name Quebec in the title of this thread. That is what brought my attention to it. I was interested in a thread that had something to do with my country and I used to live in the Ottawa Valley not that far from where the earthquakes were. I just thought wow(HOLY FREAKIN WOW was more like it), how weird(watchword) that earthquakes did happen at the time and place I (jokingly) mentioned..... so I commented. I apologise (to)Laurentian, for not grasping the essence of this thread and working with that.

In case you haven't read the "numerology thing" by Umberto Eco I think it could give you some food for thought

...lol I think its too early for me, I am on my first half of my coffee, and I did not understand a word of it....lol.... sorry

Ummm... I dont know what to say except that I feel.... lets say , not good for interrupting your thread with my silly meager comments. ok and stupid too as I see I have taken up way too much of your thread.

Laurentian, if you would humor me once more, I will attempt to make a constructive comment here:
I live 5-6 hours from the Quebec earthquakes, so I have no comment there.
I can see the Niagara Escarpment from my house(Oakville/Mississauga border in Ontario), and I report no seismic activity here during the dates you mentioned or in the last few years.
I did a few weeks ago read that Mont Tremblant ... the name is of native origin... The Trembling Giant.

cheers,
Harold
 
Good morning Harold.

I apologise (to)Laurentian, for not grasping the essence of this thread and working with that.

No need to apologies Harold, I thought that you were more familiar with the material and used humor believing that you will grasp the essence as you say. I don't know if you check Sott daily, but here are today report of earthquake around the world ;

http://www.sott.net/articles/show/204625-Moderate-quake-off-Japan
http://www.sott.net/articles/show/204628-Minor-quake-strikes-near-Northern-California-townhttp://www.sott.net/articles/show/204633-Earthquake-In-Mynamar-Causes-No-Serious-Damage-Casualties
http://www.sott.net/articles/show/204634-Moderate-earthquake-jolts-West-Sumatra
http://www.sott.net/articles/show/204635-Magnitude-6-quake-strikes-Indonesia-s-Papua
http://www.sott.net/articles/show/204623-Australia-Quake-shakes-Port-Stephens

As you can see, there is a lot going on. Most of these event, you won't hear anything on the main stream but Sott gather them and assemble them for obvious reason. I was just passing info that all. I know there is a lot of material to read Harold but it is essential to do so. Like Laura repeat often, there is no free lunch in the Universe, we are here to help you, pointing the way to tread or material and book and article but we can't do (the reading, the work) for you. I checked your post yesterday, from the beginning to now, and this as been told to you before.
You are right about the origine of the name for Mt-Tremblant and it translation.
 
Hello Laurentian,
very interesting, I have never kept a data base on seismic activity or other natural events, although I have always had a definite interest. I guess I was refferring to
4) Artificial tampering by 3rd and 4th density
STS forces in a number of different ways. ...

have you heard anything of our clocks being off by 2 minutes in the last while, a friend of mine heard it on the news and said it was due to earthquakes.

Harold, have you read this tread http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=16603.msg143734#msg143734
I guess I have read this article at least once befor this, this is a topic of great interest to me.
Q: (A) In this concept of pole shift, what would be the main feature of this pole shift, of all those which we were discussing?

A: New axial orientation, and magnetic reversal

I have been interested in this particular topic for years, and witnessed one night a few years back in the Ottawa Valley I watched the Aurora Borialis one night, and there was a beautiful vortex over our heads. This vortex was a possible magnetic pole right over the Ottawa Valley. I have read that up to a dozen poles can theroretically appear throughout the earth during these changes.

A: Close.
Q: (A) One can also have an external magnetic field to align. But, where is it going to come from?
A: Guess.
Q: (L) The wave?
A: All are interconnected

Has this question been definitevly answered? I would really like to know.
cheers,
Harold
 
Hello Laurentian,

I am curious to know what you think about this...

(L) I have a question. I've Session 30 January 2010
Author Message

Laura
Administrator

Session 30 January 2010
« on: January 31, 2010, 07:19:31 AM »



been waiting for somebody to ask it, but since nobody is going to ask it, I want to ask it: Was the Haiti earthquake an induced earthquake, or was it totally natural?

A: (Planchette swirls on board) INDUCED! Bet you didn't expect that, did you?!

Q: (L) Frankly, I didn't. Because I've already gone on record saying it wasn't. I just poo-pooed the whole idea as too far out there. (laughter) So now I've gotta...

(Joe) Well, it was the Russians who said that, wasn't it?

A: No!

Q: (Joe) Didn't you tell us the Russians reported that?

(L) The question I want to ask is, how do they induce earthquakes? (To Ark) How do you think they induce earthquakes? (Joe) Space-based satellite

(Ark) Well, just search the internet! (laughter) Yeah, it's on the internet. You create special waves that go into the earth and propagate in the right direction...

(L) I don't believe it. They don't have enough power to do that.

(Joe) I want to know who induced it?

A: U.S.

I refer to this as you mentioned an accusing finger was pointed at 'them' by me, this is what I was reffering to more or less.
Cheers,
Harold
 
Back
Top Bottom