EEQT: Wave Lab

[dant]

I am playing around with the EEQT Wave (applet) under Eclipse,
and I just watched the rotating wave bouncing from side to side,
all very interesting.

But then I added a potential wall.

And the noticed that every time a "bounce" occurred, the wave pattern
would be "reshaped" as I sort of expected. After letting this wave
run, bouncing for a long time, the wave pattern really morphed but
the unusual (unnatural?) property seems that wave energy is never
lost. I would have expected entropy or at least energy loss where
equilibrium should have been reached? Isn't this what happens in
our 3D world?

Another thing I was observing and drawing a mental picture of the
wave appearance as well. I see that as the waves are rotating,
certain wave intersections (reflections) results in added pulse
amplitude and looks sort of like a "whip" (or 2D spike), but
imagining for a moment, this "spike" is also in rotation in a 3D
plane and I wonder if inertia is even taken into account to be
added so as to give it a different form?

Finally, beizer surfaces could be added to this 3D wave to give an
appearance of a real 3D look? I am not an expert in this area,
but it certainly is interesting!

 

[ark]

I am playing around with the EEQT Wave (applet) under Eclipse,
and I just watched the rotating wave bouncing from side to side,
all very interesting.

But then I added a potential wall.

And the noticed that every time a "bounce" occurred, the wave pattern
would be "reshaped" as I sort of expected. After letting this wave
run, bouncing for a long time, the wave pattern really morphed but
the unusual (unnatural?) property seems that wave energy is never
lost. I would have expected entropy or at least energy loss where
equilibrium should have been reached? Isn't this what happens in
our 3D world?

The wave in this simulation is the quantum "probability wave". As long as there
are no detectors (no observers), the wave is not dissipating. It is not energy conservation
but probability conservation that you are dealing with. If the particle was emitted
in Cassiopaea, and if it travels for 5000 years, and if no detector detects it, it is certainly
(with probability one) somewhere in the universe. The walls which deflect the wave
are perfect walls. They change the wave but they do not change themselves. Are there
such walls in the real world? I think there are, not really perefect-perfect, but perfect
enough.

Another thing I was observing and drawing a mental picture of the
wave appearance as well. I see that as the waves are rotating,
certain wave intersections (reflections) results in added pulse
amplitude and looks sort of like a "whip" (or 2D spike), but
imagining for a moment, this "spike" is also in rotation in a 3D
plane and I wonder if inertia is even taken into account to be
added so as to give it a different form?

Although we represent the wave as a 3D object, it is living, in fact, in a different space, you may think of it being fifth and sixth
dimension - where it rotates. We do not know enough about physics in these other dimensions.

Finally, beizer surfaces could be added to this 3D wave to give an
appearance of a real 3D look? I am not an expert in this area,
but it certainly is interesting!

Yes, many more things can be added. The point is that when I want to model something really interesting, I find that my PC
is at least ten times too slow. I have to wait an hour for one step, while Nature miracolously does it in less than a nanosecond,
and does it on a microscale, with no computers that I can imagine (or is there a CRAY computer within the electron????)

 

[dant]

The wave in this simulation is the quantum "probability wave". As long as there
are no detectors (no observers), the wave is not dissipating. It is not energy conservation
but probability conservation that you are dealing with. If the particle was emitted
in Cassiopaea, and if it travels for 5000 years, and if no detector detects it, it is certainly
(with probability one) somewhere in the universe. The walls which deflect the wave
are perfect walls. They change the wave but they do not change themselves. Are there
such walls in the real world? I think there are, not really perefect-perfect, but perfect
enough.

This may be a little off topic, but your comment lead me to be thinking about
boundaries, metaphysically. Perfect boundaries and non-perfect boundaries.
A non-perfect boundary perhaps has imperfect reflections and perfect boundary
has perfect reflections? Am I correct in thinking that a boundary is a restriction,
a limitation? Is it true that if there were no boundaries, there would be no reflections
since nothing impedes the wave/energy propogations?

Recalling somewhere in the cassiopaea site, I read somewhere regarding the "Breath of
God". Waves are created by "breathing" IN and OUT. By "breathing" out, wave/energy
is sent, and by "breathing" in, what happens? How is harmony/balance maintained if
nothing is "consumed"? Is it possible that it is knowledge (all that is) that is being
"consumed" so that harmony is maintained?

Expandling along this concept, it appears to me to model something akin to radar, that
a specific energy is sent out. What is returned is "reflections" (knowledge?) so that it
can be processed (consumed?) and actions can be taken (for balance) ?

There was also a discussion regarding STS 6th density Orions, in trying to understand where
the STS and STO boundary existsed. The C's replied, if I got this correctly, that they were
"STS thought-forms" and I wondered about this to myself: "Are these simply reflections?"
Can we say that boundaries are that which opposes the source by changing it (subjectively)
for which the C's are able to discern and deflect if necessary?

This is just a thought - bizzare maybe... but I'd thought I'd share it. It came to me as I took
a shower and I don't know where the source came from but it was sure interesting to me!

 

[ark]

Wave scatter from boundaries and from the bumps of the potential (convex or concave). Boundaries are like infinitely deep or infinitely high potential walls. There are different kinds of boundaries. Mathematically one decides what kind of a boundary to use by setting so called "boundary conditions":

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Boundary_conditions

of which there are several kinds (infinitely many kinds, in fact, because you may mix different boundary conditions with arbitrary proportions). Each kind corresponds to a different (idealized) physical situation. The devil is in the details.

As for densities etc. - I am not yet there :)

 

[Mrbowtie]

what if the densities and the dimensions, are all in the same spot.

the 7 sized marbles and the the 7 width slots. all in the space.

cuz a little marble can fit inside the larger marble all too 7 slots.

dimension-ally , would be prehaps, qualites of the spectrum, )Environment(


parts of the spectrum are only perceptible by say - the 'aware-ness' of the being.
in the environment,- that <b>it</b> is aware of.


the 'wall' is the prejudice towards the environment. cuz its all the 'being knows'.




and somethin else,
cant think of it off hand -i can see it and just cant name it

its the spot Don Juan said the topic of topics

~mrtb

 

[Laura]

the 'wall' is the prejudice towards the environment. cuz its all the 'being knows'.

and somethin else,
cant think of it off hand -i can see it and just cant name it

its the spot Don Juan said the topic of topics

Perhaps this will jog your memory:

We have a predator that came from the depths of the cosmos and took over the rule of our lives. Human beings are its prisoners. [...] You have arrived, by your effort alone, to what the shamans of ancient Mexico called the topic of topics. I have been beating around the bush all this time, insinuating to you that something is holding us prisoner. Indeed we are held prisoner! This was an energetic fact for the sorcerers of ancient Mexico. [...] They took over because we are food for them, and they squeeze us mercilessly because we are their sustenance. Just as we rear chickens in chicken coops, the predators rear us in human coops. Therefore, their food is always available to them.' [...]

"'I want to appeal to your analytical mind, ' don Juan said. 'Think for a moment, and tell me how you would explain the contradiction between the intelligence of man the engineer and the stupidity of his systems of beliefs, or the stupidity of his contradictory behavior. Sorcerers believe that the predators have given us our systems of beliefs, our ideas of good and evil, our social mores. They are the ones who set up our hopes and expectations and dreams of success or failure. They have given us covetousness, greed and cowardice. It is the predators who make us complacent, routinary, and egomaniacal.' [...]

In order to keep us obedient and meek and weak, the predators engaged themselves in a stupendous maneuver - stupendous, of course, from the point of view of a fighting strategist. A horrendous maneuver from the point of view of those who suffer it. They gave us their mind! Do you hear me? The predators give us their mind, which becomes our mind. The predators' mind is baroque, contradictory, morose, filled with the fear of being discovered any minute now. [...]

Through the mind, which, after all, is their mind, the predators inject into the lives of human beings whatever is convenient for them. [Castaneda, The Active Side of Infinity, 1998, pp. 213-220]

Is that what you meant?

 

[neema]

... Yes, many more things can be added. The point is that when I want to model something really interesting, I find that my PC
is at least ten times too slow. I have to wait an hour for one step, while Nature miracolously does it in less than a nanosecond,
and does it on a microscale, with no computers that I can imagine (or is there a CRAY computer within the electron????)

Hmm... I wonder if it would be possible to actually share some of the computation processing over the internet, similar to the astronomy computation astronomers run, who ask net users to share a small portion of their pc computation power as a background program. If it may be possible I am willing to setup a computer cluster using the commodity cluster idea. I do have access to broadband and I do have access to some high end machines due to a recent business venture. I know that there will be several hours a day where the machines are not going to be used. I was planning to implement such an idea eventually due to my line of work, as a render farm for production purposes. I am planning to use Linux or UNIX based machines to implement a virtual supercomputer using an open source software similar to Beowulf or openMosix.

neema

 

[foofighter]

Unfortunately it turned out that the computation problem could not be decomposed into smaller pieces, so the computation farm idea (which we toyed with, as a screensaver) didn't work out. It *could* be done with the Markov-based quantum fractals though, theoretically. I like the idea personally though, and it would be particularly interesting to apply the computation cluster idea to what's discussed in this thread:
http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=3914

Computing prime numbers using grid techniques; now that would be very very interesting...