Emspiracy

[BHelmet]

I have noticed a qualitative difference in social media algorithmic recommendations. Some are Enticing and provocative and very much aligned with what goes on here. Has anyone else stumbled across this one? The content, presentation, pacing, multi-level approach and writing are fantastic and hard-hitting. This one is about food, the subjugation of the human soul and a bit about fighting back. It may be AI or, more likely, partially an AI production. She came on the scene in a blitzkrieg avalanche of content out of nowhere. I bet you can't watch for a minute or two without becoming somewhat thunderstruck. 4.89 stars.

She has a wad of other uploads - not all are right on - some seem like COINTELPRO - but a lot is totally aligned with the C material in a way that is surprising. I don't totally agree with all her stuff but it is, on balance, an excellent "download" to listen to, IMO.

 

[nicklebleu]

Don’t know what to think of it … super-polished, ‘she’ is likely AI. But this clip left me uneasy, not for the content, but for the vibe.

Don’t know …

 

[BHelmet]

Agree about the vibe, WTH? and Spock eyebrow raising worthy presentation. What strikes me as significant is the communication style: VERY punchy - no long "let me prove it to you" but a rapid fire series of assertions many of which I happen to agree with. In an AI future world; in a world where concensus opinion matters as to group soul agreement and alignment and soul group collective fate.... Is this a type of fighting fire with fire? Pushing back with a highly evolved psycho-effective information delivery style against the system programming we are bombarded with designed to craft a narrative reality for us to accept and remain calm as the frogs are slowly simmered? At any rate, I have not seen anyone come close to this...creation (?) up to this point. So I thought to post it and ask if anyone else's algorithm had thrust this in their view. Provocative to say the least. Reflective of a disturbance in the force. ? It is just not like anything else I recall seeing. And yeah - she seems AI-ish but the writing does not.

 

[monotonic]

This reminds me of how some cult-like groups throw a bunch of stuff you already believe in your face rapid fire to get you hooked in. It seems persuasive to you so you are emboldened to share it with others to whom it is not persuasive at all or even the opposite. Stuff goes off the rails from there until you start thinking critically again.

When arguments are presented along with assertions, it facilitates a feedback loop. When assertions are blasted at you rapid fire it doesn't matter how true they are, if there is no feedback loop. The longer and more complete the blasting the more likely you are to dissociate or stop thinking critically. The more effectively your feedback loop has been unhooked, the more likely you are to do something stupid, because what we think of as good feedback is often negative feedback which is already counterbalancing dangerous positive feedback which already exists in our lives.

AI definitely seems to be capable of facilitating this kind of blasting in service to whichever agendas are savvy enough to use it effectively.

Maybe in this case you could think of it in terms of re-programming people who have been programmed, but again the lack of feedback loop means that even if those people now believe things that are true, positive feedback will eventually throw the train off the tracks again. Disproportionate emotional validation frequently leads to intense emotional pain and a trail of wreckage in life.

There is no substitute for thinking critically. Anything too reliant on programming falls flat on it's face when it encounters something not in it's programming, and lacks the flexibility to alter course when the trajectory leads to disaster.

 

[Nević Nenad]

I wouldnt say that the face is AI, looks to me like face filter, like Snapchat filters. So, its her, but with "enhanced" beauty. For the rest of content, AI is heavily used. Its probably work of couple of persons, it would be too much for one person, given the rate of videos.

Probably trying to get some money through the Youtube, so they throw in every and all conspiracy theory they heard of. Also, notice two or three changes in themes and concept since their first video.

 

[Lyndi]

First thoughts, she's got a scarey vibe that makes me withdraw, no not withdraw, run the other way. The information good, but it's the feeling and pace of speech and the seductive presentation. I find more and more foods that come from known ethical, real farming sources work better for the body. Information coming from a strange and off-putting persona, feels hard to swallow or want to act on. I'm glad of the challenging info to be seen by more people, I hope, but it feels high-greed to me. Intention.

She knows there is a population that is aware of some if not all of this and that we appreciate seeing media that deals with the subject matter, so a target audience. It is also creating fear, suspicion, mistrust, anger as well as her pep talk at the end .... more like a feeding tube than a fellow traveller.

Very interesting. I apologize as I have so little time and pressing things to deal with these days, but was so drawn to the material then couldn't stand to listen to her, which fits with having little time but wanting to respond. Shooting from the hip.