Nević Nenad
The Living Force
Than it could come from a bigger distance than they said it was. And if that is the case Trump really had luck with that ear.
Failed Trump Assassination Attempt
- Thread starter Tristan
- Start date
Thanks for pointing that out. I just saw a post on Truth Social telling others the heavyset "Antifa Guy" photo making the rounds was not the would-be assassin.
FYI - Niall and Joe have no qualms about using the dislike button if they feel it's warranted. I'm not a fan myself and stopped using it as I think there are better and more productive ways to communicate regarding a disagreement or viewpoint of a post.
As suggested, a new thread to discuss the "dislike" button can and should be initiated if you feel so strongly about it.
Do we know how many of those shots were the killer and how many came from SS snipers counter-shots at this time? It all seemed to kinda blend in together for me. Like maybe there were only 3 shots from the assassin and 5 from the SS etc?
axj
The Living Force
I am open to all possibilities and do not rule anything out. As I said, a miniscule explosive device at his ear could have been used, considering that getting hit only in the ear is extremely unlikely. Plus, I do not see Trump in such a positive light considering his involvement in the mRNA jabs genocide, as well condoning the Israeli genocide in Gaza.
The other possibility is that this was a real assassination attempt and the extremely unlikely hit in only his ear may be due to some kind of divine protection. This does seem more likely, but I do not rule out other possibilities either.
Oh, mommies! Save me!
What arguments, statements and proofs are you writing about? I have some suggestions.
Do you have any proof? With the bunch of cases that C's used to comment on, when one shooter was obviously acting, and they claimed that there were three of them, etc. Who then, in those cases, saw any evidence?
I have already written to Keit that I never claimed that there was no shooting.
And I still hope that my logical thinking has not been shaken and my penetrating gaze (thanks for such an assessment) has remained with me. It's just that I see some possibilities, and others don't even want to look in that direction.
I will write again in other words what I have already tried to write before, so that people will moderate their emotions. I don't like the situation with the "staging" anymore (I emphasize that there can be quite a lot of staging options) than the situation with a real attack. I just see the possibility of this, and I write about it without any emotion.
Ой, мамочки! Спасите меня!
Про какие доводы, утверждения и доказательства вы пишете? У меня есть предположения.
А у вас есть доказательства? При той куче случаев, которые раньше комментировали C's, когда очевидно действовал один стрелок, а они утверждали, что их было три и т.д. Кто тогда, в тех случаях видел какие то доказательства?
Я уже писал Кейт, что никогда не утверждал того, что стрельбы не было.
И я все же надеюсь, что мое логическое мышление не пошатнулось и мой проницательный взгляд (спасибо за такую оценку) остался со мной. Просто я вижу некоторые возможности, а другие не хотят даже смотреть в эту сторону.
Напишу еще раз другими словами то, что раньше уже пытался написать, чтобы люди поумерили свои эмоции. Мне ни насколько больше не нравится ситуация с "постановкой" (подчеркну, что вариантов постановки может быть довольно много), чем ситуация с реальным нападением. Просто я вижу возможность этого, об этом и пишу без всяких эмоций.
Про какие доводы, утверждения и доказательства вы пишете? У меня есть предположения.
А у вас есть доказательства? При той куче случаев, которые раньше комментировали C's, когда очевидно действовал один стрелок, а они утверждали, что их было три и т.д. Кто тогда, в тех случаях видел какие то доказательства?
Я уже писал Кейт, что никогда не утверждал того, что стрельбы не было.
И я все же надеюсь, что мое логическое мышление не пошатнулось и мой проницательный взгляд (спасибо за такую оценку) остался со мной. Просто я вижу некоторые возможности, а другие не хотят даже смотреть в эту сторону.
Напишу еще раз другими словами то, что раньше уже пытался написать, чтобы люди поумерили свои эмоции. Мне ни насколько больше не нравится ситуация с "постановкой" (подчеркну, что вариантов постановки может быть довольно много), чем ситуация с реальным нападением. Просто я вижу возможность этого, об этом и пишу без всяких эмоций.
One twitter feed I saw was talking about a witness who was too far away to see Trump, but saw someone with a gun crawling up the roof of a building. He says that he was telling policemen in the area, and they were acting confused and not apparently doing anything (although they could have been, just not visible to the witness) The witness said that the gunman would not have been available to the secret service until he crested the the peak of the roof. The gunman was apparently shot and killed. Then there is another, they say 'potential' shooter being taken away. So possibly two shooters, or more?
Sirius
Jedi
The first three slow shots were from the assassinator, followed by a 3 sec pause, then a counter fire was launched.
For your first post, you appear to be somewhat literate with the C's material, but if you had better knowledge of the sessions, you would know that the C's discussed an assassination attempt on Trump as recently as a few months ago:
C's Session 9th March 2024 said:
You are assuming that the Quorum is acting "for the sake of universal balance". Personally, I don't place much faith in the good nature of people who conduct secret meetings with aliens with the future of humanity on the agenda.
This statement is nonsensical. I suggest you don't try to think in paradoxes; it will destroy your brain.
By the way, could you please introduce yourself in the Newbies & Important Notices to All Members forum, so other Forum members can get to know who they are speaking with? Thanks!
Why are you talking about some other situations? What relevance does that have to the current situation?
I never claimed you said there was no shooting. That's a straw man argument.
Logic is a useful tool, but can lead to wrong conclusions. And there are many possibilities, even an infinity of them, but not all of them are worth mentioning.
Except you haven't provided any evidence for the possibilities you mention. That's sloppy thinking. Taking the position of "it must be fake, because it's happening in the USA" is not one that befits a person of your intelligence, osit.
Fluffy
Jedi Council Member
I think that hits the nail on the head. Keep emotions out of the discussion, look at all angles without limiting possibilities.
We all know what lengths can be stretched to reach intended goals. Absolutely nothing is impossible or off the table when someone wishes to reach a desired outcome.
Just a note that I also never said that you claimed that there was no shooting
I will explain now what I think you said. This way there won't be any misunderstanding, and you will be able to correct me.Based on what you wrote here, I think you said that "this was a staged event. That there was no shooting to the ear, because it would be too dangerous. That instead the ear was damaged with some device, if it was damaged at all. Maybe in the subsequent "medical exam" the ear was carefully and safely damaged. As a result we have a hero figure that now no one will dare to remove before the elections. It's a real pity that someone suffered and died as a result of it."
And so if my understanding and translation are correct, my comments here still stand and relevant.
I will just clarify this particular sentence:
Apologies if the above wasn't clear enough, and the following would be more accurate:
This is my opinion at this particular point, and it doesn't mean it wouldn't change if some other facts would become available. But the general sentiment expressed in this post would still be very much relevant and valid.
Evan
Dagobah Resident
Indeed, a .308 sniper rifle would have only required one shot from a trained sniper. The AR15 at that distance is
more like “unload the clip and hope you hit your target” scattershot fingers crossed. Not a professional looking job. More like a fanatic trying to make a statement.
fifty_five
Jedi Master
A view from the outside. The picture that goes around the world is iconic and I frankly think that's all that's needed, just as iconic are the agents Smith protecting him and exposing him at the same time with a clenched fist and blood in his face: don't think for a moment that he's someone who drains the swamp. He's our protégé. And he himself thanks them, the battle is a common one. God bless America, first.
Last edited:
